IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v196y2012i1p651-66210.1007-s10479-012-1105-6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Convexity of chance constrained programming problems with respect to a new generalized concavity notion

Author

Listed:
  • Zahra Mashayekhi Zadeh
  • Esmaile Khorram

Abstract

In this paper, convexity of chance constrained problems have been investigated. A new generalization of convexity concept, named h-concavity, has been introduced and it has been shown that this new concept is the generalization of the α-concavity. Then, using the new concept, some of the previous results obtained by Shapiro et al. [in Lecture Notes on Stochastic Programming Modeling and Theory, SIAM and MPS, 2009 ] on properties of α-concave functions, have been extended. Next the convexity of chance constraints with independent random variables is investigated. It will be shown how concavity properties of the mapping related to the decision vector have to be combined with suitable properties of decrease or increase for the marginal densities in order to arrive at convexity of the feasible set for large enough probability levels and then sufficient conditions for convexity of chance constrained problems which has been introduced by Henrion and Strugarek [in Convexity of chance constraints with independent random variables. Comput. Optim. Appl. 41:263–276, 2008 ] has been extended in this paper for a wider class of real functions. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Suggested Citation

  • Zahra Mashayekhi Zadeh & Esmaile Khorram, 2012. "Convexity of chance constrained programming problems with respect to a new generalized concavity notion," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 196(1), pages 651-662, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:196:y:2012:i:1:p:651-662:10.1007/s10479-012-1105-6
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-012-1105-6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-012-1105-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-012-1105-6?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vijay S. Bawa, 1973. "On Chance Constrained Programming Problems with Joint Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 19(11), pages 1326-1331, July.
    2. Bruce L. Miller & Harvey M. Wagner, 1965. "Chance Constrained Programming with Joint Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 13(6), pages 930-945, December.
    3. A. Charnes & W. W. Cooper & G. H. Symonds, 1958. "Cost Horizons and Certainty Equivalents: An Approach to Stochastic Programming of Heating Oil," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(3), pages 235-263, April.
    4. Asgeir Tomasgard & Jan Audestad & Shane Dye & Leen Stougie & Maarten van der Vlerk & Stein Wallace, 1998. "Modelling aspects of distributed processingin telecommunication networks," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 82(0), pages 161-185, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tamás L. Balogh & Christian Ewerhart, 2015. "On the origin of r-concavity and related concepts," ECON - Working Papers 187, Department of Economics - University of Zurich.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marla, Lavanya & Rikun, Alexander & Stauffer, Gautier & Pratsini, Eleni, 2020. "Robust modeling and planning: Insights from three industrial applications," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 7(C).
    2. Rashed Khanjani-Shiraz & Salman Khodayifar & Panos M. Pardalos, 2021. "Copula theory approach to stochastic geometric programming," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 435-468, October.
    3. Yanikoglu, I. & den Hertog, D., 2011. "Safe Approximations of Chance Constraints Using Historical Data," Other publications TiSEM ab77f6f2-248a-42f1-bde1-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. L. Jeff Hong & Zhiyuan Huang & Henry Lam, 2021. "Learning-Based Robust Optimization: Procedures and Statistical Guarantees," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3447-3467, June.
    5. Nemirovski, Arkadi, 2012. "On safe tractable approximations of chance constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 707-718.
    6. repec:dgr:rugsom:03a14 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Maji, Chandi Charan, 1975. "Intertemporal allocation of irrigation water in the Mayurakshi Project (India): an application of deterministic and chance-constrained linear programming," ISU General Staff Papers 197501010800006381, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    8. Xiaodi Bai & Jie Sun & Xiaojin Zheng, 2021. "An Augmented Lagrangian Decomposition Method for Chance-Constrained Optimization Problems," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1056-1069, July.
    9. Mahboubeh Farid & Hampus Hallman & Mikael Palmblad & Johannes Vänngård, 2021. "Multi-Objective Pharmaceutical Portfolio Optimization under Uncertainty of Cost and Return," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(18), pages 1-11, September.
    10. Rashed Khanjani Shiraz & Madjid Tavana & Hirofumi Fukuyama, 2021. "A joint chance-constrained data envelopment analysis model with random output data," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 1255-1277, June.
    11. L. Jeff Hong & Jun Luo & Barry L. Nelson, 2015. "Chance Constrained Selection of the Best," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 317-334, May.
    12. Kampas, Athanasios & White, Ben, 2003. "Probabilistic programming for nitrate pollution control: Comparing different probabilistic constraint approximations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(1), pages 217-228, May.
    13. Bowen Li & Ruiwei Jiang & Johanna L. Mathieu, 2022. "Integrating unimodality into distributionally robust optimal power flow," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(3), pages 594-617, October.
    14. Zheng, Xiaojin & Wu, Baiyi & Cui, Xueting, 2017. "Cell-and-bound algorithm for chance constrained programs with discrete distributions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 260(2), pages 421-431.
    15. Minjiao Zhang & Simge Küçükyavuz & Saumya Goel, 2014. "A Branch-and-Cut Method for Dynamic Decision Making Under Joint Chance Constraints," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(5), pages 1317-1333, May.
    16. Patrice Gaillardetz & Saeb Hachem, 2019. "Risk-Control Strategies," Papers 1908.02228, arXiv.org.
    17. Cooper, W. W. & Hemphill, H. & Huang, Z. & Li, S. & Lelas, V. & Sullivan, D. W., 1997. "Survey of mathematical programming models in air pollution management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(1), pages 1-35, January.
    18. M. C. Campi & S. Garatti, 2011. "A Sampling-and-Discarding Approach to Chance-Constrained Optimization: Feasibility and Optimality," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 148(2), pages 257-280, February.
    19. Yanikoglu, I. & den Hertog, D., 2011. "Safe Approximations of Chance Constraints Using Historical Data," Discussion Paper 2011-137, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    20. Xiao Liu & Simge Küçükyavuz, 2018. "A polyhedral study of the static probabilistic lot-sizing problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 261(1), pages 233-254, February.
    21. İhsan Yanıkoğlu & Dick den Hertog, 2013. "Safe Approximations of Ambiguous Chance Constraints Using Historical Data," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 25(4), pages 666-681, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:196:y:2012:i:1:p:651-662:10.1007/s10479-012-1105-6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.