IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v190y2011i1p325-33710.1007-s10479-009-0635-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A stochastic programming and simulation based analysis of the structure of production on the arable land

Author

Listed:
  • Béla Vizvári
  • Zoltán Lakner
  • Zsolt Csizmadia
  • Gergely Kovács

Abstract

This paper is devoted to the analysis of the effectiveness of the use of arable land. This is an issue, which is important for national-level decision makers. The particular calculations are carried out for Hungary, but similar analysis can be made for each country having several parts with different geographical conditions. In general the structure of the use of arable land has been developed in an evolutionary manner in each country. This paper is devoted to the evaluation of the effectiveness of this structure. Some main crops must be included in the analysis such that the land used for their production is a high percentage in the total arable land of the country. From agricultural point of view the question to be answered is whether or not the same level of supply is achievable with high probability on a smaller area. As the agriculture is affected by stochastic factors via the weather, no supply can be guaranteed up to 100 per cent. Thus each production structure provides the required supply only with a certain probability. One inequality corresponding to each crop must be satisfied at the same time with a prescribed probability. The main theoretical difficulty here is that the inequalities are not independent from one another from stochastic point of view as the yields of the crops are highly correlated. The problem is modeled by a chance constrained stochastic programming model such that the stochastic variables are on the left-hand side of the inequalities, while the right-hand sides are constants. Kataoka was the first in 1963 who solved a similar problem with a single inequality in the probabilistic constraint. The mathematical analysis of the present problem is using the results of Kataoka. This problem is solved numerically via discretization. Numerical results for the optimal structure of the production are presented for the case of Hungary. It is shown that a much higher probability, i.e. a more safe supply, can be achieved on a smaller area than what is provided by the current practice. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Suggested Citation

  • Béla Vizvári & Zoltán Lakner & Zsolt Csizmadia & Gergely Kovács, 2011. "A stochastic programming and simulation based analysis of the structure of production on the arable land," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 325-337, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:190:y:2011:i:1:p:325-337:10.1007/s10479-009-0635-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-009-0635-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-009-0635-z
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-009-0635-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulrich Hampicke & Dieter Roth, 2000. "Costs of land use for conservation in Central Europe and future agricultural policy," International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 95-108.
    2. Alexandre Gohin & Jean-Christophe Bureau, 2006. "Modelling the EU sugar supply to assess sectoral policy reforms," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 33(2), pages 223-247, June.
    3. Csaba Fábián & Zoltán Szőke, 2007. "Solving two-stage stochastic programming problems with level decomposition," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 313-353, October.
    4. Gene M. Grossman & Alan B. Krueger, 1995. "Economic Growth and the Environment," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 110(2), pages 353-377.
    5. Richard Tol, 2002. "Estimates of the Damage Costs of Climate Change. Part 1: Benchmark Estimates," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 21(1), pages 47-73, January.
    6. Richard Tol, 2002. "Estimates of the Damage Costs of Climate Change, Part II. Dynamic Estimates," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 21(2), pages 135-160, February.
    7. Ian R. Gordon & Paul C. Cheshire, 1998. "original: Territorial competition: Some lessons for policy," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 32(3), pages 321-346.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Béla Vizvári & Zoltán Lakner, 2014. "A stochastic programming based analysis of the field use in a farm," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 219(1), pages 231-242, August.
    2. Sheng-I Chen & Wei-Fu Chen, 2021. "The Optimal Harvest Decisions for Natural and Artificial Maturation Mangoes under Uncertain Demand, Yields and Prices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Borodin, Valeria & Bourtembourg, Jean & Hnaien, Faicel & Labadie, Nacima, 2016. "Handling uncertainty in agricultural supply chain management: A state of the art," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 254(2), pages 348-359.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Galindo, Luis Miguel & Samaniego, Joseluis, 2010. "La economía del cambio climático en América Latina y el Caribe: algunos hechos estilizados," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), April.
    2. Fouquet, Roger, 2011. "Long run trends in energy-related external costs," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(12), pages 2380-2389.
    3. Dong, Kangyin & Hochman, Gal & Zhang, Yaqing & Sun, Renjin & Li, Hui & Liao, Hua, 2018. "CO2 emissions, economic and population growth, and renewable energy: Empirical evidence across regions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 180-192.
    4. Richard S.J. Tol, 2003. "The Marginal Costs Of Carbon Dioxide Emissions: An Assessment Of The Uncertainties," Working Papers FNU-19, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised Apr 2003.
    5. Reinhard Mechler & Stefan Hochrainer & Asbjørn Aaheim & Håkon Salen & Anita Wreford, 2010. "Modelling economic impacts and adaptation to extreme events: Insights from European case studies," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 737-762, October.
    6. Luca Gerotto & Paolo Pellizzari, 2021. "A replication of Pindyck’s willingness to pay: on the efforts required to obtain results," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 1(5), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Pindyck, Robert S., 2012. "Uncertain outcomes and climate change policy," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 289-303.
    8. Roberto Roson & Martina Sartori, 2016. "Estimation of Climate Change Damage Functions for 140 Regions in the GTAP 9 Database," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 1(2), pages 78-115, December.
    9. Ng, Pin & Zhao, Xiaobing, 2011. "No matter how it is measured, income declines with global warming," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(5), pages 963-970, March.
    10. Adrian Amelung, 2016. "Das "Paris-Agreement": Durchbruch der Top-Down-Klimaschutzverhandlungen im Kreise der Vereinten Nationen," Otto-Wolff-Institut Discussion Paper Series 03/2016, Otto-Wolff-Institut für Wirtschaftsordnung, Köln, Deutschland.
    11. Hallegatte, Stéphane & Ghil, Michael, 2008. "Natural disasters impacting a macroeconomic model with endogenous dynamics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(1-2), pages 582-592, December.
    12. Kelly C. de Bruin & Rob B. Dellink & Richard S.J. Tol, 2007. "AD-DICE: An Implementation of Adaptation in the DICE Mode," Working Papers 2007.51, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    13. Zhang, Hong & Jin, Gui & Zhang, Zhengyu, 2021. "Coupling system of carbon emission and social economy: A review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    14. Changxin Liu & Hailing Zhang & Zheng Wang, 2019. "Study on the Functional Improvement of Economic Damage Assessment for the Integrated Assessment Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, February.
    15. Fischer, Carolyn & Fox, Alan K., 2011. "On the Scope for Output-Based Rebating in Climate Policy," Conference papers 332056, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    16. Kverndokk, Snorre & Rose, Adam, 2008. "Equity and Justice in Global Warming Policy," International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, now publishers, vol. 2(2), pages 135-176, October.
    17. Kornek, Ulrike & Klenert, David & Edenhofer, Ottmar & Fleurbaey, Marc, 2021. "The social cost of carbon and inequality: When local redistribution shapes global carbon prices," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    18. Runkel, Marco & Kellner, Maximilian, 2018. "Climate Policy and Optimal Public Debt," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181639, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    19. Richard S.J. Tol, 2002. "Climate, Development And Malaria: An Application Of Fund," Working Papers FNU-16, Research unit Sustainability and Global Change, Hamburg University, revised Sep 2002.
    20. Bosello, Francesco & Roson, Roberto & Tol, Richard S.J., 2008. "Economy-wide estimates of the implications of climate change - a rejoinder," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 14-15, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:190:y:2011:i:1:p:325-337:10.1007/s10479-009-0635-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.