IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/annopr/v133y2005i1p265-27610.1007-s10479-004-5037-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Weak No-Arbitrage in Securities Markets with Frictions

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaotie Deng
  • Zhong Li
  • Shouyang Wang
  • Hailiang Yang

Abstract

In this paper we consider a financial market model with frictions which include transaction costs, bid-ask spread and taxes. By using optimization, linear and nonlinear programming and convex programming techniques, several necessary and sufficient conditions are derived for the weak no-arbitrage. Some results on state prices are also provided. The results of this paper can provide at least some theoretical insight to the problem. Copyright Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaotie Deng & Zhong Li & Shouyang Wang & Hailiang Yang, 2005. "Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Weak No-Arbitrage in Securities Markets with Frictions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 133(1), pages 265-276, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:133:y:2005:i:1:p:265-276:10.1007/s10479-004-5037-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10479-004-5037-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10479-004-5037-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10479-004-5037-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jouini Elyes & Kallal Hedi, 1995. "Martingales and Arbitrage in Securities Markets with Transaction Costs," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 178-197, June.
    2. Ardalan, Kavous, 1999. "The no-arbitrage condition and financial markets with transaction costs and heterogeneous information: The bid-ask spread," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 83-91.
    3. Dermody, Jaime Cuevas & Prisman, Eliezer Z., 1993. "No Arbitrage and Valuation in Markets with Realistic Transaction Costs," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 28(1), pages 65-80, March.
    4. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5630 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Ross, Stephen A, 1978. "A Simple Approach to the Valuation of Risky Streams," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 51(3), pages 453-475, July.
    6. Elyégs Jouini & Hédi Kallal, 1995. "Arbitrage In Securities Markets With Short‐Sales Constraints," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(3), pages 197-232, July.
    7. Gur Huberman, 2005. "A Simple Approach to Arbitrage Pricing Theory," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Sudipto Bhattacharya & George M Constantinides (ed.), Theory Of Valuation, chapter 9, pages 289-308, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    8. Prisman, Eliezer Z, 1986. "Valuation of Risky Assets in Arbitrage Free Economies with Frictions," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 41(3), pages 545-557, July.
    9. Shunming Zhang & Chunlei Xu & Xiaotie Deng, 2002. "Dynamic Arbitrage‐Free Asset Pricing with Proportional Transaction Costs," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 89-97, January.
    10. Ross, Stephen A, 1987. "Arbitrage and Martingales with Taxation," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 95(2), pages 371-393, April.
    11. J. Jacod & A.N. Shiryaev, 1998. "Local martingales and the fundamental asset pricing theorems in the discrete-time case," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 259-273.
    12. Pham, Huyen & Touzi, Nizar, 1999. "The fundamental theorem of asset pricing with cone constraints," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 265-279, March.
    13. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5647 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wanxiao Tang & Jun Zhao & Peibiao Zhao, 2019. "Geometric No-Arbitrage Analysis in the Dynamic Financial Market with Transaction Costs," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-17, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. X. Chao & K. Lai & Shou-Yang Wang & Mei Yu, 2005. "Optimal Consumption Portfolio and No-Arbitrage with Nonproportional Transaction Costs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 211-221, March.
    2. Kallio, Markku & Ziemba, William T., 2007. "Using Tucker's theorem of the alternative to simplify, review and expand discrete arbitrage theory," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(8), pages 2281-2302, August.
    3. Alain Chateauneuf & Bernard Cornet, 2022. "Submodular financial markets with frictions," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 73(2), pages 721-744, April.
    4. Cerreia-Vioglio, S. & Maccheroni, F. & Marinacci, M., 2015. "Put–Call Parity and market frictions," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 730-762.
    5. Jouini, Elyes & Kallal, Hedi & Napp, Clotilde, 2001. "Arbitrage and viability in securities markets with fixed trading costs," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 197-221, April.
    6. Alet Roux, 2007. "The fundamental theorem of asset pricing under proportional transaction costs," Papers 0710.2758, arXiv.org.
    7. Chambers, Robert G. & Quiggin, John, 2008. "Narrowing the no-arbitrage bounds," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 1-14, January.
    8. Elyès Jouini & Hédi Kallal, 1999. "Viability and Equilibrium in Securities Markets with Frictions," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 275-292, July.
    9. Fontana, Claudio & Runggaldier, Wolfgang J., 2021. "Arbitrage concepts under trading restrictions in discrete-time financial markets," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 66-80.
    10. Jochen Wilhelm & Josef Schosser, 2007. "A note on arbitrage-free asset prices with and without personal income taxes," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 133-149, August.
    11. Chambers, Robert G. & Quiggin, John C., 2002. "Resource Allocation And Asset Pricing," Working Papers 28594, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    12. Lorenzo Bastianello & Alain Chateauneuf & Bernard Cornet, 2022. "Put-Call Parities, absence of arbitrage opportunities and non-linear pricing rules," Papers 2203.16292, arXiv.org.
    13. Aloisio Araujo & Alain Chateauneuf & José Heleno Faro & Bruno Holanda, 2019. "Updating pricing rules," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 68(2), pages 335-361, September.
    14. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5374 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. M. Dempster & I. Evstigneev & M. Taksar, 2006. "Asset Pricing and Hedging in Financial Markets with Transaction Costs: An Approach Based on the Von Neumann–Gale Model," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 327-355, October.
    16. Jouini, Elyes & Kallal, Hedi, 2001. "Efficient Trading Strategies in the Presence of Market Frictions," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 14(2), pages 343-369.
    17. Robert Jarrow & Philip Protter & Sergio Pulido, 2015. "The Effect Of Trading Futures On Short Sale Constraints," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 311-338, April.
    18. repec:dau:papers:123456789/5593 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Claudio Fontana & Wolfgang J. Runggaldier, 2020. "Arbitrage concepts under trading restrictions in discrete-time financial markets," Papers 2006.15563, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2020.
    20. Delia Coculescu & Monique Jeanblanc, 2017. "Some No-Arbitrage Rules For Converging Asset Prices under Short-Sales Constraints," Papers 1709.09252, arXiv.org.
    21. Napp, C., 2003. "The Dalang-Morton-Willinger theorem under cone constraints," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1-2), pages 111-126, February.
    22. Delia Coculescu & Monique Jeanblanc, 2019. "Some no-arbitrage rules under short-sales constraints, and applications to converging asset prices," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 397-421, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:annopr:v:133:y:2005:i:1:p:265-276:10.1007/s10479-004-5037-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.