IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sph/rjedep/v9y2020i3p75-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Management and the Governmental Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • Rahil Asadi

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Larisa Mihoreanu

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies)

  • Vasilica Georgiana Radu

    (POLITECHNICA Univ. Bucharest)

Abstract

Nowadays, the concept of Knowledge Management (KM) is gradually being recognized in governmental establishments which are seeking to deploy their own KM system and make the most of their existing knowledge in policymaking by creating and maintaining a competitive advantage in the domestic and international environment. Knowledge is a primary resource featured to provide a competitive advantage to any organization that recognizes and incorporates it efficiently in its processes. This article aims to review the knowledge management value and pillars by describing its cycle and highlighting its importance for governmental organizations. Knowledge management will begin and proceed from within organizations. In this article, a computational model is proposed where the organizations will accomplish this aim by developing this model and analyzing the components that influence it. The obstacles and difficulties of implementing and deploying knowledge management in governmental organizations as well as suggested solutions are also discussed.As a result, the importance of knowledge management and the governmental organization's need for knowledge management to achieve the profitability has been demonstrated, along with recommendations for decision-makers to enhance the efficiency of the knowledge management implementation and scale up the gain of a lasting competitive advantage within national and international environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Rahil Asadi & Larisa Mihoreanu & Vasilica Georgiana Radu, 2020. "Knowledge Management and the Governmental Organizations," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 9(3), pages 75-82, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sph:rjedep:v:9:y:2020:i:3:p:75-82
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jedep.spiruharet.ro/RePEc/sph/rjedep/JEDEP9_3_2020_663-1720-1-PB.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John R. Turner & Rose Baker, 2017. "Team Emergence Leadership Development and Evaluation: A Theoretical Model Using Complexity Theory," Journal of Information & Knowledge Management (JIKM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(02), pages 1-17, June.
    2. Rose Dieng-Kuntz & Nada Matta, 2002. "Knowledge Management and Organizational Memories," Post-Print hal-02920184, HAL.
    3. Adam Grzegorczyk & Eugen Ghiorghiţă, 2017. "Knowledge management as a strategic business resource," Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, Alliance of Central-Eastern European Universities, vol. 6(2), pages 63-72, June.
    4. repec:sph:rjedep:v:2:y:2017:i:6:p:63-72 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohammadjavad Shabankareh & Ali Sarhadi, 2023. "The analysis of the electronic customer relationship management system based on marketing performance and knowledge management of the company using the Fuzzy cognitive map approach," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 1-23, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      Knowledge; Knowledge Management; Governmental organizations;
      All these keywords.

      JEL classification:

      • D74 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Conflict; Conflict Resolution; Alliances; Revolutions
      • D83 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Search; Learning; Information and Knowledge; Communication; Belief; Unawareness
      • M00 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General - - - General
      • O20 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - General

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sph:rjedep:v:9:y:2020:i:3:p:75-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Rocsana Bucea-Manea-Tonis (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://jedep.spiruharet.ro/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.