IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sot/journl/y2005i31p15-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fairness, efficiency and the simultaneity of pricing and infrastructure capacity choice

Author

Listed:
  • Kopp, Andreas

Abstract

The primary objective of infrastructure pricing in normative economics and policy discussions is economic efficiency. This focus has led to the proposal that charges for infrastructure use should be based on all internal and external marginal costs associated with the use of infrastructure services. Distributional considerations of the ‘fairness’ of infrastructure pricing often played a supplementary role to help the acceptance of infrastructure charging. This paper sets out a simple framework for a quasi-market for infrastructure services with the perspective of simultaneously determining efficient prices and levels of infrastructure investment. It is shown that, depending on the intensity of infrastructure use, revenues generated by efficient prices do not in all cases cover the full costs of the services. Efficient cost recovery requires an additional fixed charge. Such a combination of a fixed charge and an efficient price per unit of service implies a distributional conflict if users differ substantially in their demand for infrastructure services. It is shown that methods to allocate fixed costs resolve this conflict applying standard norms of distributional justice and being compatible with a bargaining equilibrium among heterogeneous infrastructure users.

Suggested Citation

  • Kopp, Andreas, 2005. "Fairness, efficiency and the simultaneity of pricing and infrastructure capacity choice," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 31, pages 15-27.
    • Handle: RePEc:sot:journl:y:2005:i:31:p:15-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10077/5881
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R.J. Aumann & S. Hart (ed.), 2002. "Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 3, number 3.
    2. Martin Shubik, 1962. "Incentives, Decentralized Control, the Assignment of Joint Costs and Internal Pricing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(3), pages 325-343, April.
    3. Leonard J. Mirman & Yair Tauman, 1982. "Demand Compatible Equitable Cost Sharing Prices," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 40-56, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. de Palma, Andre & Marcucci, Edoardo & Niskanen, Esko & Wieland, Bernhard, 2005. "Introduction," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 31, pages 1-5.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yves Sprumont, 2010. "An Axiomatization of the Serial Cost-Sharing Method," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 78(5), pages 1711-1748, September.
    2. Friedman, Eric & Moulin, Herve, 1999. "Three Methods to Share Joint Costs or Surplus," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 275-312, August.
    3. Hervé Moulin & Yves Sprumont, 2007. "Fair allocation of production externalities : recent results," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 117(1), pages 7-36.
    4. Friedman, Eric J., 2012. "Asymmetric Cost Sharing mechanisms," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 139-151.
    5. Albizuri, M.J. & Díez, H. & Sarachu, A., 2014. "Monotonicity and the Aumann–Shapley cost-sharing method in the discrete case," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(2), pages 560-565.
    6. Moulin, Herve, 2002. "Axiomatic cost and surplus sharing," Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, in: K. J. Arrow & A. K. Sen & K. Suzumura (ed.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 6, pages 289-357, Elsevier.
    7. Moulin, Herve & Sprumont, Yves, 2006. "Responsibility and cross-subsidization in cost sharing," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 152-188, April.
    8. Eric Friedman, 1997. "Weak and Strong Consistency in Additive Cost Sharing," Departmental Working Papers 199707, Rutgers University, Department of Economics.
    9. Eric Friedman, 1997. "Paths in Additive Cost Sharing," Departmental Working Papers 199706, Rutgers University, Department of Economics.
    10. Zaremba Leszek & Zaremba Cezary S. & Suchenek Marek, 2017. "Modification of Shapley Value and its Implementation in Decision Making," Foundations of Management, Sciendo, vol. 9(1), pages 257-272, October.
    11. Calvo, E. & Santos, J. C., 2001. "Prices in Mixed Cost Allocation Problems," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 243-258, November.
    12. Yves Sprumont, 2008. "Nearly serial sharing methods," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 37(2), pages 155-184, June.
    13. Welter, Dominik & Napel, Stefan, 2016. "Responsibility-based allocation of cartel damages," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145886, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    14. Peyton Young, H., 1998. "Cost allocation, demand revelation, and core implementation," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 213-228, December.
    15. Larrea, C. & Santos, J.C., 2007. "A characterization of the pseudo-average cost method," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 140-149, March.
    16. Larrea, Concepcion & Santos, J.C., 2006. "Cost allocation schemes: An asymptotic approach," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 63-72, October.
    17. Calvo, Emilio & Santos, Juan Carlos, 2000. "A value for multichoice games," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 341-354, November.
    18. Bergantiños, Gustavo & Valencia-Toledo, Alfredo & Vidal-Puga, Juan, 2016. "Consistency in PERT problems," MPRA Paper 68973, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Avraham Beja & Israel Zang, 1986. "Internal Pricing and Cost Allocation for Efficient Decentralized Control," Discussion Papers 703, Northwestern University, Center for Mathematical Studies in Economics and Management Science.
    20. Moulin, Herve & Sprumont, Yves, 2005. "On demand responsiveness in additive cost sharing," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 125(1), pages 1-35, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sot:journl:y:2005:i:31:p:15-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Romeo Danielis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/xxxxxxx.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.