IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sos/sosjrn/240221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Türkiye’s Green Economy Performance in Compliance with the European Green Deal: Assessment and Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Gülay KÜÇÜK
  • Betül YÜCE-DURAL

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate Türkiye’s performance in the green economy within the framework of the European Green Deal. Türkiye’s green economy performance was assessed using a Green Economy Progress (GEP) index developed through the Green Economy Measurement Framework. The study examines the progress in the green economy's environmental, social, and economic dimensions to determine Türkiye’s readiness to transition to a sustainable economy. The dataset utilised in this study comprises 13 green economy indicators spanning from 2011 to 2020. The findings demonstrate that Türkiye is indeed progressing towards a greener economy. However, the rate of progress falls short in terms of meeting the criteria set by the European Green Deal. Notably, the high greenhouse gas emissions present substantial challenges for Türkiye.

Suggested Citation

  • Gülay KÜÇÜK & Betül YÜCE-DURAL, 2024. "Türkiye’s Green Economy Performance in Compliance with the European Green Deal: Assessment and Perspectives," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 32(60).
    • Handle: RePEc:sos:sosjrn:240221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3439385
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 2023. "Status and protection of persons," Chapters, in: International Conflict and Security Law, chapter 9, pages 190-210, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Anton Nahman & Brian K. Mahumani & Willem J. de Lange, 2016. "Beyond GDP: Towards a Green Economy Index," Development Southern Africa, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 215-233, March.
    3. Olga Lavrinenko & Svetlana Ignatjeva & Alina Ohotina & Oleg Rybalkin & Dainis Lazdans, 2019. "The Role of Green Economy in Sustainable Development (Case Study: The EU States)," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 6(3), pages 1113-1126, March.
    4. Sohag, Kazi & Taşkın, F. Dilvin & Malik, Muhammad Nasir, 2019. "Green economic growth, cleaner energy and militarization: Evidence from Turkey," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    5. ., 2023. "Prevention and provisional measures of protection," Chapters, in: Litigating the Environment, chapter 5, pages 148-179, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Sims, Katharine R.E., 2023. "Towards equity in land protection," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(2), pages 201-230, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehmet Balcilar & Ojonugwa Usman & George N. Ike, 2023. "Investing green for sustainable development without ditching economic growth," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 728-743, April.
    2. Asif Raihan & Almagul Tuspekova, 2022. "Dynamic impacts of economic growth, energy use, urbanization, tourism, agricultural value-added, and forested area on carbon dioxide emissions in Brazil," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(4), pages 794-814, December.
    3. Viktor Pirmana & Armida Salsiah Alisjahbana & Rutger Hoekstra & Arnold Tukker, 2019. "Implementation Barriers for a System of Environmental-Economic Accounting in Developing Countries and Its Implications for Monitoring Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-35, November.
    4. Marcin Rabe & Yuriy Bilan & Katarzyna Widera & László Vasa, 2022. "Application of the Linear Programming Method in the Construction of a Mathematical Model of Optimization Distributed Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Javier Cifuentes-Faura & Ursula Faura-Martínez & Matilde Lafuente-Lechuga, 2020. "Assessment of Sustainable Development in Secondary School Economics Students According to Gender," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Alejandro Padilla-Rivera & Sara Russo-Garrido & Nicolas Merveille, 2020. "Addressing the Social Aspects of a Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Mihaela Simionescu & Yuriy Bilan & Emília Krajňáková & Dalia Streimikiene & Stanisław Gędek, 2019. "Renewable Energy in the Electricity Sector and GDP per Capita in the European Union," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, June.
    8. Alekna Rokas & Kazlauskienė Eglė, 2020. "Evaluation Indicators of Green Economic Development: The Case of the Baltic Countries," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 17(1), pages 150-163, June.
    9. Marcin Kopiczko & Jaroslaw Jaworski, 2021. "Characteristics of the Parameters of Lithium Iron Phosphate Energy Storage in the Context of their Usefulness in the Management of Distribution Grid," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3B), pages 817-826.
    10. Oleg RYBALKIN, 2022. "Sustainable development goals progress in the European Union: correlation with EEPSE green economy index," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 3(2), pages 121-135, April.
    11. Maria Cristina Arcuri & Raoul Pisani, 2021. "Is Trade Credit a Sustainable Resource for Medium-Sized Italian Green Companies?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Bo Chen & Feng Jin & Guangchen Li & Yurong Zhao, 2023. "Can the New Energy Demonstration City Policy Promote Green and Low-Carbon Development? Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, May.
    13. Muhammad Ramzan & Ummara Razi & Muhammad Umer Quddoos & Tomiwa Sunday Adebayo, 2023. "Do green innovation and financial globalization contribute to the ecological sustainability and energy transition in the United Kingdom? Policy insights from a bootstrap rolling window approach," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 393-414, February.
    14. Ahmet Koseoglu & Ali Gokhan Yucel & Recep Ulucak, 2022. "Green innovation and ecological footprint relationship for a sustainable development: Evidence from top 20 green innovator countries," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(5), pages 976-988, October.
    15. Natalia Vukovic & Vladimir Pobedinsky & Sergey Mityagin & Andrei Drozhzhin & Zhanna Mingaleva, 2019. "A Study on Green Economy Indicators and Modeling: Russian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-13, August.
    16. Miao, Nana & Sharif, Arshian & Ozturk, Ilhan & Razzaq, Asif, 2023. "How do the exploitation of natural resources and fiscal policy affect green growth? Moderating role of ecological governance in G7 countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    17. Md. Khaled Bin Amir, 2021. "Banker Attitudes and Perception towards Green Banking: An Empirical Study on Conventional Banks in Bangladesh," International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(2), pages 47-56, April.
    18. Aleksandra Jezierska-Thöle & Marta Gwiaździńska-Goraj & Małgorzata Dudzińska, 2022. "Environmental, Social, and Economic Aspects of the Green Economy in Polish Rural Areas—A Spatial Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, May.
    19. Pang, Dezhi & Jin, Xin & Zheng, Kengcheng & Tien, Nguyen Hoang, 2024. "A road toward green growth: Optimizing the role of mineral resources, fintech innovation and effective governance in G-20 economies," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    20. Luo, Cheng & Li, Yonggang, 2024. "Asymmetric influence of fintech, oil prices, and precious metals on green growth of emerging seven countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sos:sosjrn:240221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aysen Sivrikaya (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sosyoekonomijournal.org/home.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.