IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sos/sosjrn/180309.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bölgesel Kalkınmada Kamunun Rolü: Türkiye Üzerine Ampirik Bir AnalizAbstract: The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of public investments and investment incentives on regional development in Turkey by using panel data method with the period of 2004-2010. For that purpose, the NUTS (Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics) Level 2 which divides Turkey into 26 separate regions is used for division of regions. According to the results of the Fixed Effects Model regression, there are two main findings. The first one states that the public investments effect regional development positively. If it is considered in details, the positive effects of public investments on transportation and education is greater than the effects of other public investments. Secondly, the domestic investment incentives do not contribute to the regional development of Turkey while the foreign incentives have positive impact on regional development

Author

Listed:
  • Gökhan DEMİRTAŞ
  • Ebuzer AKSEL

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Gökhan DEMİRTAŞ & Ebuzer AKSEL, 2018. "Bölgesel Kalkınmada Kamunun Rolü: Türkiye Üzerine Ampirik Bir AnalizAbstract: The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of public investments and investment incentives on regional development in ," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society.
    • Handle: RePEc:sos:sosjrn:180309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dergipark.gov.tr/download/article-file/510373
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shi, Yingying, 2012. "The Role of Infrastructure Capital in China’s Regional Economic Growth," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126547, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Alfredo Del Monte & Antonio Acconcia, 2000. "Regional Development and Public Spending: The Case of Italy," STUDI ECONOMICI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2000(72).
    3. Yushkov, Andrey, 2015. "Fiscal decentralization and regional economic growth: Theory, empirics, and the Russian experience," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(4), pages 404-418.
    4. Alfredo Pereira & Jorge Andraz, 2006. "Public investment in transportation infrastructures and regional asymmetries in Portugal," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 40(4), pages 803-817, December.
    5. Hüseyin AĞIR & Muhsin KAR, 2010. "Türkiye’de Elektrik Tüketimi ve Ekonomik Gelişmişlik Düzeyi İlişkisi: Yatay Kesit Analizi," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 2010-EN.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Septimiu-Rares SZABO, 2017. "The Empirical Relationship Between Fiscal Decentralization And Economic Growth: A Review Of Variables, Models And Results," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(2), pages 47-66, June.
    2. Andrés Rodríguez-Pose & Yannis Psycharis & Vassilis Tselios, 2012. "Public investment and regional growth and convergence: Evidence from Greece," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(3), pages 543-568, August.
    3. Alfredo Pereira & Jorge Andraz, 2012. "On the economic and budgetary effects of investments in SCUTS: the Portuguese toll-free highways," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 48(1), pages 321-338, February.
    4. Carlos Enrique González Taranco, 2023. "Análisis del impacto macroeconómico de la Descentralización Fiscal en el Crecimiento Económico del Perú, período 2004-2023," Revista de Análisis Económico y Financiero, Universidad de San Martín de Porres, vol. 6(02), pages 26-36.
    5. Evgeny N. Timushev, 2019. "Federal Intergovernmental Transfers and the Level of Intraregional Fiscal Decentralization in Russia," Finansovyj žhurnal — Financial Journal, Financial Research Institute, Moscow 125375, Russia, issue 6, pages 27-42, December.
    6. Miguel Gómez-Antonio & Ana Angulo Garijo, 2012. "Evaluating the Effect of Public investment on Productivity Growth Using an Urban Economics Approach for the Spanish Provinces," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 35(4), pages 389-423, October.
    7. Silvia Bertarelli, 2006. "Public capital and growth," Politica economica, Società editrice il Mulino, issue 3, pages 361-398.
    8. Najkar, N. & Kohansal, M. R. & Ghorbani, M., 2018. "Estimating Spatial Effects of Transport Infrastructure on Agricultural Output of Iran," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 10(2).
    9. Elburz, Zeynep & Nijkamp, Peter & Pels, Eric, 2017. "Public infrastructure and regional growth: Lessons from meta-analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-8.
    10. Jorge M. Andraz & Nélia M. Norte & Hugo S. Gonçalves, 2016. "Do tourism spillovers matter in regional economic analysis? An application to Portugal," Tourism Economics, , vol. 22(5), pages 939-963, October.
    11. E. N. Timushev, 2021. "Intraregional (Local) Fiscal Decentralization and Investment in Fixed Assets in Russia," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 87-97, January.
    12. Juan David Barón & Gerson Javier pérez & Peter Rowland, 2004. "A Regional Economic Policy for Colombia," Revista de Economía del Rosario, Universidad del Rosario, December.
    13. Sergio Destefanis & Vania Sena, 2005. "Public capital and total factor productivity: New evidence from the Italian regions, 1970-98," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(5), pages 603-617.
    14. Riccardo Crescenzi & Andrés Rodríguez-Pose, 2012. "Infrastructure and regional growth in the European Union," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(3), pages 487-513, August.
    15. Tran Thi Kim Oanh, 2024. "Impact of fiscal decentralisation on economic growth in Vietnam—A spatial regression approach," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 258-282, June.
    16. Bui, Duy Tung & Nguyen , Canh Phuc & Dinh , Thanh Su, 2021. "Fiscal Decentralisation and Externalities on Economic Growth: Spatial-provincial evidence from Vietnam," Journal of Economic Development, The Economic Research Institute, Chung-Ang University, vol. 46(4), pages 31-64, December.
    17. Miguel Gómez-Antonio & Bernard Fingleton, 2012. "Regional productivity variation and the impact of public capital stock: an analysis with spatial interaction, with reference to Spain," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(28), pages 3665-3677, October.
    18. Federico Bonaglia & Eliana La Ferrara & Massimiliano Marcellino, 2000. "Public Capital and Economic Performance: Evidence from Italy," Giornale degli Economisti, GDE (Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economia), Bocconi University, vol. 59(2), pages 221-244, September.
    19. M. Yu. Malkina & R. V. Balakin, 2020. "Decomposition of Tax Revenue Growth in Russian Regions," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 117-126, April.
    20. Presbitero, Andrea F., 2016. "Too much and too fast? Public investment scaling-up and absorptive capacity," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 17-31.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R58 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - Regional Development Planning and Policy
    • H00 - Public Economics - - General - - - General
    • C33 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sos:sosjrn:180309. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Aysen Sivrikaya (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sosyoekonomijournal.org/home.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.