IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sja/journl/v9y2020ispecialp4-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Constitution Of United States Of America And Its Path To Democracy Through Its Amendments

Author

Listed:
  • Etleva Paplekaj

    (Faculty of Law, University of Prishtina, Kosovo)

Abstract

The United States of America defined the national purpose in the first two words of its Constitution. The United States of America is the state where the rulers have gained the authority to speak, to act on behalf of 'We the People'. 'We the People' was the philosophy of the 'founding fathers' of the Constitution of the United States of America. 'We the People' was the theory, the attitude that would serve as a guiding principle of governance. For the 'Founding Fathers', the two-word phrase 'We the People' was a creed, a doctrine, an ideology in action and not in words. The history of the Constitution of the United States of America taught us that ‘We the People’ which was converted to myth deserve this conversion. Through this research, keeping in mind the content and the historical background of the U.S Constitution we will elaborate and answer the below questions. How is it possible for the Constitution that began with 'We the People' it did not list the fundamental rights and freedoms but also denied the fundamental rights and freedoms of the individuals (people)? How are explained the slavery, the denial of citizenship, the restrictions of the right to vote for different groups of American society of that time? Was there any purpose for the deprivation of the fundamental rights and freedoms of the individual in the Constitution of the United States of America? Did the Constitution of the United States of America at the drafting time recognize the right of women to vote? Through this article we will try to shed light on this seemingly contradicts between the myth of the Constitution of United States of America and the ‘denied’ or ‘unforeseen’ fundamental rights and the role of the amendments of U.S. Constitution in this process.

Suggested Citation

  • Etleva Paplekaj, 2020. "The Constitution Of United States Of America And Its Path To Democracy Through Its Amendments," Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 9(Special I), pages 4-15, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:9:y:2020:i:special:p:4-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.adjuris.ro/revista/articole/an9nrs/1.%20ETLEVA%20PAPLEKAJ.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger D. Congleton & Birgitta Swedenborg (ed.), 2006. "Democratic Constitutional Design and Public Policy: Analysis and Evidence," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262033496, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stutzer Alois & Frey Bruno S., 2006. "Making International Organizations More Democratic," Review of Law & Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 1(3), pages 305-330, January.
    2. Roger D. Congleton, 2020. "Governance by true believers: supreme duties with and without totalitarianism," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 31(1), pages 111-141, March.
    3. Glaeser, Edward L. & Ponzetto, Giacomo A.M., 2018. "The political economy of transportation investment," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 13(C), pages 4-26.
    4. Stefan Voigt, 2011. "Positive constitutional economics II—a survey of recent developments," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 205-256, January.
    5. Roger Congleton, 2011. "Why local governments do not maximize profits: on the value added by the representative institutions of town and city governance," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 149(1), pages 187-207, October.
    6. Toke Aidt & Felix Grey & Alexandru Savu, 2021. "The Meaningful Votes: Voting on Brexit in the British House of Commons," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 186(3), pages 587-617, March.
    7. Kauder Björn & Potrafke Niklas, 2019. "Conservative Politicians and Voting on Same-sex Marriage," German Economic Review, De Gruyter, vol. 20(4), pages 600-617, December.
    8. Mause, Karsten, 2019. "Governing Public-Private Partnerships: The Problem of Low-Cost Decisions," EconStor Preprints 209582, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    9. Per Fredriksson & Daniel Millimet, 2007. "Legislative Organization and Pollution Taxation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 217-242, April.
    10. Roger Congleton, 2007. "Nicolaus Tideman: Collective decisions and voting: The potential for public choice," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 133(3), pages 499-501, December.
    11. Hayo, Bernd & Voigt, Stefan, 2007. "Explaining de facto judicial independence," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 269-290, September.
    12. Björn Kauder & Niklas Potrafke & Marina Riem, 2017. "Do Parties Punish MPs for Voting Against the Party Line?," CESifo Economic Studies, CESifo Group, vol. 63(3), pages 317-332.
    13. Bernd Hayo & Stefan Voigt, 2008. "The Relevance of Judicial Procedure for Economic Growth," MAGKS Papers on Economics 200828, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    14. Hayo, Bernd & Voigt, Stefan, 2016. "Explaining constitutional change: The case of judicial independence," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-13.
    15. Stefan Voigt & Lorenz Blume, "undated". "The Economic Effects of Direct Democracy - A Cross-Country Assessment," German Working Papers in Law and Economics 2006-1-1144, Berkeley Electronic Press.
    16. Roger Congleton, 2013. "On the inevitability of divided government and improbability of a complete separation of powers," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 177-198, September.
    17. Liam O’Farrell & Katrín Oddsdóttir, 2023. "‘Where is the new constitution?’ Activist art and the politics of space in Iceland," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 41(7), pages 1333-1350, November.
    18. Viktor Vanberg, 2011. "Liberal constitutionalism, constitutional liberalism and democracy," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Pijus Krūminas, 2019. "Public R&D under different electoral rules: evidence from OECD countries," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 300-329, September.
    20. Voßwinkel, Jan, 2007. "Die (Un-)Ordnung des deutschen Föderalismus: Überlegungen zu einer konstitutionenökonomischen Analyse," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 07/1, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Constitution; historic development; review of constitution; amendment methods; amending subjects.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K10 - Law and Economics - - Basic Areas of Law - - - General (Constitutional Law)
    • K38 - Law and Economics - - Other Substantive Areas of Law - - - Human Rights Law; Gender Law; Animal Rights Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sja:journl:v:9:y:2020:i:special:p:4-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catalin-Silviu Sararu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssjarea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.