IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgm/pzwzuw/v9i34ay2011p226-246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The problems of personnel policy in Polish state owned companies' supervisory boards (Problemy polityki personalnej w radach nadzorczych spolek Skarbu Panstwa)

Author

Listed:
  • Igor Postula

    (Wydzial Zarzadzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego)

Abstract

The paper discusses the personnel policy in supervisory boards of Polish state owned companies' (SOCs). The aim of the research conducted by the author was to decide if the personnel policy guarantees that supervisory boards secure SOCs' interests. The accomplishment of this general aim demanded to solve three particular problems. Firstly, whose interests are supported by the personnel policy - only shareholders' or also other SOC' stakeholders', in particular their employees. Secondly, if legal rules guarantee that SOCs' supervisory boards members acquire appropriate skills and knowledge. Thirdly, if personnel policy promotes that SOCs operate according to public interest or stay under the political influence. The research consists of the analysis of regulations as well as large sample analysis conducted among SOCs' management and supervisory boards members.

Suggested Citation

  • Igor Postula, 2011. "The problems of personnel policy in Polish state owned companies' supervisory boards (Problemy polityki personalnej w radach nadzorczych spolek Skarbu Panstwa)," Problemy Zarzadzania, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 9(34a), pages 226-246.
    • Handle: RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:9:i:34a:y:2011:p:226-246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://pz.wz.uw.edu.pl/sites/default/files/artykuly/pz_4_2011-1_postula.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://pz.wz.uw.edu.pl/en
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. Edward Freeman & Andrew C. Wicks & Bidhan Parmar, 2004. "Stakeholder Theory and “The Corporate Objective Revisited”," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 364-369, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Müllner, Jakob & Puck, Jonas, 2018. "Towards a holistic framework of MNE–state bargaining: A formal model and case-based analysis," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 15-26.
    2. Chakraborty, Atreya & Gao, Lucia Silva & Sheikh, Shahbaz, 2019. "Managerial risk taking incentives, corporate social responsibility and firm risk," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 58-72.
    3. AnnMarie Bennett & Breda Murphy, 2017. "The Tax Profession: Tax Avoidance and the Public Interest," Economics Department Working Paper Series n286-17.pdf, Department of Economics, National University of Ireland - Maynooth.
    4. Udeh, Francis Nnoli & Abiahu, Mary-Fidelis Chidoziem & Tambou, Liberty Ejomafuvwe, 2017. "Impact of Corporate Governance on Firms Financial Performance: A Study of Quoted Banks in Nigeria," MPRA Paper 94923, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 07 Jul 2019.
    5. Yanica P. Dimitrova, 2020. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Innovation – the Meaningful Connection," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 89-108.
    6. Christof Miska & Mark E. Mendenhall, 2018. "Responsible Leadership: A Mapping of Extant Research and Future Directions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 148(1), pages 117-134, March.
    7. Bidhan L. Parmar & Adrian Keevil & Andrew C. Wicks, 2019. "People and Profits: The Impact of Corporate Objectives on Employees’ Need Satisfaction at Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 13-33, January.
    8. Huei-Ting Tsai & Hsin-Cheng Chang & Ming-Tien Tsai, 2016. "Predicting repurchase intention for online clothing brands in Taiwan: quality disconfirmation, satisfaction, and corporate social responsibility," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 375-399, September.
    9. Jan Kultys, 2016. "Controversies About Agency Theory As Theoretical Basis For Corporate Governance," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 7(4), pages 613-634, December.
    10. Naeem Tabassum & Satwinder Singh, 2020. "Corporate Governance and Organisational Performance," Springer Books, Springer, number 978-3-030-48527-6, March.
    11. Cooper, Maggie & Nguyen, Quyen T.K., 2019. "Understanding the interaction of motivation and opportunity for tax planning inside US multinationals: A qualitative study," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 1-1.
    12. Yi Tang & Cuili Qian & Guoli Chen & Rui Shen, 2015. "How CEO hubris affects corporate social (ir)responsibility," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(9), pages 1338-1357, September.
    13. Carolina Ortíz Riaga & Yenni Viviana Duque Orozco, 2009. "Prácticas de responsabilidad social en mujeres empresarias profesionales de Bogotá, Medellín y Cali," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, June.
    14. Pepe Lee Chang, 2017. "The Abandoned Stakeholders: Pharmaceutical Companies and Research Participants," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 143(4), pages 721-731, July.
    15. Achard, Paola Olimpia & Di Berardino, Antonina, 2018. "Public Private Partnerships: Strategic Assets and Managerial Models," 29th European Regional ITS Conference, Trento 2018 184925, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    16. Ala'aldin Alrowwad & Bader Yousef Obeidat & Ali Tarhini & Noor Aqqad, 2017. "The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Organizational Performance via the Mediating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 199-221, January.
    17. André Laplume & Kent Walker & Zhou Zhang & Xin Yu, 2021. "Incumbent Stakeholder Management Performance and New Entry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 174(3), pages 629-644, December.
    18. Sheikh, Shahbaz, 2018. "Is corporate social responsibility a value-increasing investment? Evidence from antitakeover provisions," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 1-12.
    19. Ali Dirany & Dima Jamali & Melanie Ashleigh, 2009. "CSR Is Knocking: A Call For HR To Join," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 1(1), pages 8-14, April.
    20. Yafet Yosafet Wilben Rissy, 2021. "The stakeholder model: its relevance, concept, and application in the Indonesian banking sector," Journal of Banking Regulation, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(3), pages 219-231, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgm:pzwzuw:v:9:i:34a:y:2011:p:226-246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/somuwpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.