IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgh/gosnar/y2019i4p5-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teorie ładu akademickiego

Author

Listed:
  • Piotr Urbanek

Abstract

Ważną cechą badań naukowych poświęconych problematyce ładu akademickiego jest ich wielowymiarowość. Żadna z tradycyjnych dyscyplin pojedynczo nie jest w stanie pokazać istoty zjawisk zachodzących w tak złożonej instytucji społecznej, jaką jest uniwersytet. Oznacza to, że takie badania powinny być prowadzone przy wykorzystaniu różnych interdyscyplinarnych perspektyw teoretycznych. Celem artykułu jest prezentacja teorii, które mogą być użyte do wyjaśnienia procesów składających się na ład akademicki. Użytą metodą badawczą jest krytyczna analiza piśmiennictwa. Przedstawione zostały najczęściej przywoływane w literaturze teorie: agencji, służebności, interesariuszy, zasobowa, neoinstytucjonalna, uwarunkowań kulturowych. Teorie te w wielu elementach nawiązują do twierdzeń formułowanych w ramach teorii ładu korporacyjnego opisujących mechanizmy władzy i kontroli w korporacjach. Zarazem teorie ładu akademickiego akcentują to, na czym polega specyfika instytucji akademickich oraz instytucjonalnych struktur odpowiedzialnych za zarządzanie tymi instytucjami. Zaprezentowana w artykule typologia charakteryzuje się podejściem pozytywnym, w którym nacisk jest położony na zrozumienie, wyjaśnianie i przewidywanie złożonych procesów zachodzących w akademickim środowisku instytucjonalnym. Zarazem może to być punkt wyjścia przy próbach normatywnego określenia warunków, które powinny spełniać efektywne struktury instytucjonalne odpowiedzialne za kierowanie i nadzór nad uniwersytetami.

Suggested Citation

  • Piotr Urbanek, 2019. "Teorie ładu akademickiego," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 4, pages 5-30.
    • Handle: RePEc:sgh:gosnar:y:2019:i:4:p:5-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.journalssystem.com/gna/pdf-113062-45271
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Raghuram G. Rajan & Luigi Zingales, 1998. "Power in a Theory of the Firm," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 113(2), pages 387-432.
    2. Melinda Muth & Lex Donaldson, 1998. "Stewardship Theory and Board Structure: a contingency approach," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(1), pages 5-28, January.
    3. Humphry Hung, 1998. "A typology of the theories of the roles of governing boards," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(2), pages 101-111, April.
    4. Jean Hartley & Michael J. R. Butler & John Benington, 2002. "Local Government Modernization: UK and Comparative Analysis from an Organizational Perspective," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 387-404, January.
    5. Mathies, Charles & Slaughter, Sheila, 2013. "University trustees as channels between academe and industry: Toward an understanding of the executive science network," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 1286-1300.
    6. Bruno S. Frey & Fabian Homberg & Margit Osterloh, 2013. "Organizational Control Systems and Pay-for-Performance in the Public Service," CREMA Working Paper Series 2013-11, Center for Research in Economics, Management and the Arts (CREMA).
    7. Johan P. Olsen, 2005. "The institutional dynamics of the (European) University," ARENA Working Papers 15, ARENA.
    8. Douglass C. North, 1991. "Institutions," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 5(1), pages 97-112, Winter.
    9. Jason E. Lane, 2007. "The Spider Web of Oversight: An Analysis of External Oversight of Higher Education," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 78(6), pages 615-644, November.
    10. Gianluca Andresani & Ewan Ferlie, 2006. "Studying governance within the British public sector and without," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 415-431, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kim, Incheol & Pantzalis, Christos & Zhang, Zhengyi, 2021. "Multinationality and the value of green innovation," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Chris Cornforth, 2004. "The Governance of cooperatives and mutual associations: a paradox perspective," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(1), pages 11-32, March.
    3. Dilger, Alexander & Frick, Bernd & Speckbacher, Gerhard, 1999. "Mitbestimmung als zentrale Frage der Corporate Governance," Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Diskussionspapiere 02/1999, University of Greifswald, Faculty of Law and Economics.
    4. Patrick Velte, 2010. "Stewardship-Theorie," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 285-293, April.
    5. Patrick Velte & Stefan Weber, 2010. "Koalitionsbildungen im Rahmen der Corporate Governance als Anlass für weitere Reformen des unternehmerischen Überwachungssystems," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 393-417, March.
    6. Morten Huse & Robert Hoskisson & Alessandro Zattoni & Riccardo Viganò, 2011. "New perspectives on board research: changing the research agenda," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 15(1), pages 5-28, February.
    7. Nomelif Kemei & Oyaro Jackson Ong’eta & Biru Sara & Omondi Richard Mc’Otieno, 2020. "Performance of Procurement Methods and Practices in Faith – Based Organizations in Kenya," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 7(8), pages 116-128, August.
    8. Laura Padilla-Angulo, 2020. "The impact of board diversity on strategic change: a stakeholder perspective," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 24(4), pages 927-952, December.
    9. BORDEAN Ovidiu-Niculae & CRIȘAN Emil Lucian & POP Zenovia Cristiana, 2012. "A Multi-Theory Approach Of The Strategic Role Of Boards," Studies in Business and Economics, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 7(2), pages 43-51, August.
    10. Imanol Basterretxea & Chris Cornforth & Iñaki Heras-Saizarbitoria, 2022. "Corporate governance as a key aspect in the failure of worker cooperatives," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(1), pages 362-387, February.
    11. Stijn Van Puyvelde & Ralf Caers & Cind Du Bois & Marc Jegers, 2016. "Managerial Objectives and the Governance of Public and Non-Profit Organizations," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 221-237, February.
    12. Simon Learmount, 2002. "Theorizing Corporate Governance: New Organizational Alternatives," Working Papers wp237, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    13. Rafael Chaves & Robert Schediwy, 2004. "Introducción al monográfico "Gobierno, democracia y directivos en las empresas cooperativas"," CIRIEC-España, revista de economía pública, social y cooperativa, CIRIEC-España, issue 48, pages 5-10, April.
    14. Paolo Roffia & Virginia Simón-Moya & Javier Sendra García, 2022. "Board of director attributes: effects on financial performance in SMEs," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 1141-1172, September.
    15. Carmen Guzmán & Francisco J. Santos & María de la O. Barroso, 2020. "Analysing the links between cooperative principles, entrepreneurial orientation and performance," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1075-1089, December.
    16. Chilosi, Alberto & Damiani, Mirella, 2007. "Stakeholders vs. shareholders in corporate governance," MPRA Paper 2334, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Filomena Pietrovito & Alberto Franco Pozzolo, 2021. "Credit constraints and exports of SMEs in emerging and developing countries," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(1), pages 311-332, January.
    18. Lu, Yun & Ntim, Collins G. & Zhang, Qingjing & Li, Pingli, 2022. "Board of directors’ attributes and corporate outcomes: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    19. Harjoto, Maretno Agus & Rossi, Fabrizio & Lee, Robert & Sergi, Bruno S., 2021. "How do equity markets react to COVID-19? Evidence from emerging and developed countries," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    20. Becker, Sascha & Hvide, Hans V, 2013. "Do entrepreneurs matter?," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 109, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ład akademicki; uniwersytet; akademickie środowisko instytucjonalne;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D02 - Microeconomics - - General - - - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • I20 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - General
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgh:gosnar:y:2019:i:4:p:5-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Grzegorz Konat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.