IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgh/annals/i32y2013p23-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Rules for the Jury of the Fryderyk Chopin Piano Competition as a Non Standard Voting Rule

Author

Listed:
  • Honorata Sosnowska

    (Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie)

Abstract

Game theoreticians usually deal with some standard voting methods such as plurality voting or approval voting. In reality however, some non standard more complex voting methods are used. In this paper we shall present the voting method used by the jury of the International Fryderyk Chopin Piano Competition. The voting method is very complicated and unclear. We present some unexpected effects of such a complicated voting rule.

Suggested Citation

  • Honorata Sosnowska, 2013. "The Rules for the Jury of the Fryderyk Chopin Piano Competition as a Non Standard Voting Rule," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 32, pages 23-31.
    • Handle: RePEc:sgh:annals:i:32:y:2013:p:23-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rocznikikae.sgh.waw.pl/p/roczniki_kae_z32_02.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marcin Malawski & Krzysztof Przybyszewski & Honorata Sosnowska, 2010. "Cognitive effort of voters under three different voting methods - an experimental study," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 20(3-4), pages 69-79.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:wut:journl:v:3-4:y:2011:id:1014 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Krzysztof Przybyszewski & Monika Rzeska & Honorata Sosnowska, 2011. "Cognitive properties of approval voting. An experimental approach," Operations Research and Decisions, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 21(3-4), pages 21-34.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    voting; classical music competition;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgh:annals:i:32:y:2013:p:23-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michał Bernardelli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.