IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sgh/annals/i31y2013p117-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Odporność składki kwantylowej na ε-zaburzenie rozkładu liczby szkód

Author

Listed:
  • Agata Boratyńska

    (Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie)

  • Krzysztof Kondraszuk

    (Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie)

Abstract

W pracy rozważana jest odporność składki kwantylowej w modelu ryzyka łącznego ze względu na zaburzenia rozkładu liczby szkód. Przy obliczaniu składki kwantylowej zostały wykorzystane popularne metody aproksymacji- rozkładem normalnym, przesuniętym rozkładem gamma, przybliżonymi formułami Wilsona-Hilferty’ego oraz Fishera-Cornisha (znanymi w literaturze także jako aproksymacje NP2 oraz NP3), przesuniętym rozkładem odwrotnym gaussowskim oraz aproksymacja mieszana. Jako miarę odporności zastosowano prawdopodobieństwo przekroczenia składki przez łączną szkodę. W artykule przedstawione są wyniki przeprowadzonej analizy dokładności składki kwantylowej przy zaburzaniu rozkładu liczby szkód dla portfela ubezpieczyciela opisanego rozkładami złożonymi- Poissona oraz ujemnym dwumianowym. Odstępstwo od założonego w modelu rozkładu liczby szkód definiuje się w formie ε-zaburzenia. W przeprowadzonym badaniu, które zostało wykonane z wykorzystaniem metod symulacyjnych, uwzględniono analizę wrażliwości składki w zależności od przyjętego rozkładu zaburzającego oraz jego wariancji, siły zaburzenia ε, rozkładu wielkości pojedynczej szkody, jego charakterystyk, a także wielkości portfela.

Suggested Citation

  • Agata Boratyńska & Krzysztof Kondraszuk, 2013. "Odporność składki kwantylowej na ε-zaburzenie rozkładu liczby szkód," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 31, pages 117-136.
    • Handle: RePEc:sgh:annals:i:31:y:2013:p:117-136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rocznikikae.sgh.waw.pl/p/roczniki_kae_z31_07.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chaubey, Yogendra P. & Garrido, Jose & Trudeau, Sonia, 1998. "On the computation of aggregate claims distributions: some new approximations," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 215-230, December.
    2. Krzysztof Burnecki & Marek Teuerle, 2010. "Ruin Probability in Finite Time," HSC Research Reports HSC/10/04, Hugo Steinhaus Center, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reijnen, Rajko & Albers, Willem & Kallenberg, Wilbert C.M., 2005. "Approximations for stop-loss reinsurance premiums," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 237-250, June.
    2. Riza Andrian Ibrahim & Sukono & Herlina Napitupulu & Rose Irnawaty Ibrahim, 2024. "Earthquake Bond Pricing Model Involving the Inconstant Event Intensity and Maximum Strength," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Krzysztof Burnecki & Marek A. Teuerle & Aleksandra Wilkowska, 2021. "Ruin Probability for the Insurer–Reinsurer Model for Exponential Claims: A Probabilistic Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-10, May.
    4. Riza Andrian Ibrahim & Sukono & Herlina Napitupulu & Rose Irnawaty Ibrahim, 2023. "How to Price Catastrophe Bonds for Sustainable Earthquake Funding? A Systematic Review of the Pricing Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-19, May.
    5. Krzysztof Burnecki & Rafal Weron, 2006. "Visualization tools for insurance risk processes," HSC Research Reports HSC/06/06, Hugo Steinhaus Center, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.
    6. Yacine Koucha & Alfredo D. Egidio dos Reis, 2021. "Approximations to ultimate ruin probabilities with a Wienner process perturbation," Papers 2107.02537, arXiv.org.
    7. Scalas, Enrico, 2006. "The application of continuous-time random walks in finance and economics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 362(2), pages 225-239.
    8. Franck Adékambi & Kokou Essiomle, 2020. "Ruin Probability for Stochastic Flows of Financial Contract under Phase-Type Distribution," Risks, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Sukono & Herlina Napitupulu & Riaman & Riza Andrian Ibrahim & Muhamad Deni Johansyah & Rizki Apriva Hidayana, 2023. "A Regional Catastrophe Bond Pricing Model and Its Application in Indonesia’s Provinces," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Krzysztof Burnecki & Mario Nicoló Giuricich, 2017. "Stable Weak Approximation at Work in Index-Linked Catastrophe Bond Pricing," Risks, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Syuhada, Khreshna & Tjahjono, Venansius & Hakim, Arief, 2024. "Compound Poisson–Lindley process with Sarmanov dependence structure and its application for premium-based spectral risk forecasting," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 467(C).
    12. Ma, Zong-Gang & Ma, Chao-Qun, 2013. "Pricing catastrophe risk bonds: A mixed approximation method," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 243-254.
    13. Başak Bulut Karageyik & Şule Şahin, 2017. "Determination of the Optimal Retention Level Based on Different Measures," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    14. Griffin, Philip S. & Maller, Ross A. & Roberts, Dale, 2013. "Finite time ruin probabilities for tempered stable insurance risk processes," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 478-489.
    15. David J. Santana & Juan González-Hernández & Luis Rincón, 2017. "Approximation of the Ultimate Ruin Probability in the Classical Risk Model Using Erlang Mixtures," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 775-798, September.
    16. Rafał Wójcik & Charlie Wusuo Liu & Jayanta Guin, 2019. "Direct and Hierarchical Models for Aggregating Spatially Dependent Catastrophe Risks," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-22, May.
    17. Arkadiusz Filip & Marcin Wienke, 2013. "Odporność składki kwantylowej ze względu na zaburzenia rozkładu wielkości pojedynczej szkody w modelu ryzyka łącznego," Collegium of Economic Analysis Annals, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of Economic Analysis, issue 31, pages 137-155.
    18. Pawel Mista, 2006. "Analytical and numerical approach to corporate operational risk modelling," HSC Research Reports HSC/06/03, Hugo Steinhaus Center, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.
    19. Mariana Arozo B. de Melo & Cristiano A. C. Fernandes & Eduardo F. L. de Melo, 2018. "Forecasting aggregate claims using score‐driven time series models," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 72(3), pages 354-374, August.
    20. Riza Andrian Ibrahim & Sukono & Herlina Napitupulu, 2022. "Multiple-Trigger Catastrophe Bond Pricing Model and Its Simulation Using Numerical Methods," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-17, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sgh:annals:i:31:y:2013:p:117-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michał Bernardelli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sgwawpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.