IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sen/journl/v13i4y2012p362-389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

NARUC as Network: A Perspective on the U.S. Regulatory Policy Community

Author

Listed:
  • J.A. Beecher

Abstract

While much has been written about network industries, somewhat less attention has been paid to the policy networks among regulators themselves. Networks serve the collective and individual interests of members through professional socialization, capacity development, and institutionalization. Regulatory networks are particularly valuable if they help address information asymmetry, an inherent strategic advantage of regulated firms. Given potential tradeoff s associated with networking, regulatory networks must be vigilant about protecting institutional integrity. The history and culture of U.S. regulation are inextricably tied to the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC). This paper presents an historical and cultural account of ‘NARUC as network’ and offers a perspective for thinking about regulatory policy networks generally.

Suggested Citation

  • J.A. Beecher, 2012. "NARUC as Network: A Perspective on the U.S. Regulatory Policy Community," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, Intersentia, vol. 13(4), pages 362-389, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:13:i:4:y:2012:p:362-389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Janice A. Beecher, 2019. "Does regulation fail or do we fail regulation?," Competition and Regulation in Network Industries, , vol. 20(3), pages 258-269, September.
    2. Lodge, Martin & Stern, Jon, 2014. "British utility regulation: Consolidation, existential angst, or fiasco?," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 146-151.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sen:journl:v:13:i:4:y:2012:p:362-389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Petra Van den Bempt (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.crninet.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.