IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sek/jijobm/v9y2021i1p1-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Institutional Sustainability of St. Paul University Philippines Using the Four Perspectives of the Balanced Scorecard

Author

Listed:
  • Shirley Enriquez

    (St. Paul University Philippines)

Abstract

The study aimed to assess the institutional sustainability of St. Paul University Philippines (SPUP) using the four perspectives of the balanced scorecard, namely: internal processes; learning and innovation, customer and financial perspectives. Furthermore, it considered the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of SPUP in the balanced scorecard inorder to come up with proposed strategies. This study employed the quantitative descriptive method to assess the University?s performance along the four perspectives of the balanced scorecard. The primary data were obtained using a survey questionnaire. The secondary data includes the financial statements, enrollment summary, faculty profile, faculty performance evaluation, number of employees, and number of resigned full-time faculty for academic year, 2015-2016 to 2017-2018. One hundred ninety-three (193) participants were obtained through stratified sampling to include office staff and maintenance personnel, faculty, lay administrators, students and parents. Data were treated using frequency counts, mean, and ratios. Results show that the scorecard of SPUP has positive performance in the internal processes, learning and growth, and customers? perspectives. It adopted aggressive working capital management in its financial perspective of the balanced scorecard brought by low liquidity and short-term solvency. It has less performance in the financial perspective of the Balanced Scorecard.

Suggested Citation

  • Shirley Enriquez, 2021. "Institutional Sustainability of St. Paul University Philippines Using the Four Perspectives of the Balanced Scorecard," International Journal of Business and Management, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 9(1), pages 1-33, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sek:jijobm:v:9:y:2021:i:1:p:1-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iises.net/international-journal-of-business-management/publication-detail-116941
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://iises.net/international-journal-of-business-management/publication-detail-116941?download=1
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rozhan Othman, 2008. "Enhancing the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard with scenario planning," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 57(3), pages 259-266, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Juan Du & Wenxin Wang & Xinghua Gao & Min Hu & Haili Jiang, 2023. "Sustainable Operations: A Systematic Operational Performance Evaluation Framework for Public–Private Partnership Transportation Infrastructure Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Ivo Hristov & Andrea Appolloni & Antonio Chirico, 2022. "The adoption of the key performance indicators to integrate sustainability in the business strategy: A novel five‐dimensional framework," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3216-3230, November.
    3. Nyirenda, Tanang & J. Dzonzi Undi, 2017. "State and outlook of land use and agriculture sector in Machinga district, Malawi," African Journal of Rural Development (AFJRD), AFrican Journal of Rural Development (AFJRD), vol. 1(3), March.
    4. Tobias Hahn & Frank Figge, 2018. "Why Architecture Does Not Matter: On the Fallacy of Sustainability Balanced Scorecards," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 919-935, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Keywords: institutional sustainability; balanced scorecard; internal processes; learning and innovation; customer; financial perspective;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
    • D22 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Empirical Analysis
    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sek:jijobm:v:9:y:2021:i:1:p:1-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Klara Cermakova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ijobm.iises.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.