IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/vgmu00/2021i3p200-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"Упреждающее" Государственное Управление И Оценка Рисков Национальной Безопасности

Author

Listed:
  • Зарочинцев С. В.

Abstract

В настоящей статье рассматриваются вопросы формирования новых подходов к государственному управлению в контексте оценки рисков национальной безопасности государства и развития информационных технологий. На анализе международной и российской научной литературы дается обзор эволюции теоретических представлений об использовании расширенных количественных методов применительно к стратегическим оценкам и планированию в сфере национальной безопасности и обороны.Делается вывод о возрастающей роли индикаторов и показателей в государственном управлении и его трансформации в сторону предупреждения ключевых рисков и угроз безопасности государства. "Предвидение" будущего становится новым элементом и фактором качества государственного управления. Процесс принятия решений все больше опирается на большие объемы данных, сформированные по результатам оценок состояния индикаторов и показателей различного уровня.

Suggested Citation

  • Зарочинцев С. В., 2021. ""Упреждающее" Государственное Управление И Оценка Рисков Национальной Безопасности," Вопросы государственного и муниципального управления // Public administration issues, НИУ ВШЭ, issue 3, pages 200-218.
    • Handle: RePEc:scn:vgmu00:2021:i:3:p:200-218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://vgmu.hse.ru/data/2021/09/24/1472651991/PAI_3-2021%289%29.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Bilusich & Steven Lord & Rick Nunes-Vaz, 2015. "The implications of empirical data for risk," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 521-538, April.
    2. Eirik Bjorheim Abrahamsen & Kenneth Pettersen & Terje Aven & Mareile Kaufmann & Tony Rosqvist, 2017. "A framework for selection of strategy for management of security measures," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 404-417, March.
    3. Terje Aven & Louis Anthony Cox, 2016. "National and Global Risk Studies: How Can the Field of Risk Analysis Contribute?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(2), pages 186-190, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Terje Aven, 2018. "An Emerging New Risk Analysis Science: Foundations and Implications," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(5), pages 876-888, May.
    2. Axon, C.J. & Darton, R.C., 2023. "Risk profiles of scenarios for the low-carbon transition," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    3. Zio, E., 2018. "The future of risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 176-190.
    4. Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim & Selvik, Jon Tømmerås & Milazzo, Maria Francesca & Langdalen, Henrik & Dahl, Roy Endre & Bansal, Surbhi & Abrahamsen, Håkon Bjorheim, 2021. "On the use of the ‘Return Of Safety Investments’ (ROSI) measure for decision-making in the chemical processing industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    5. Ivano Bongiovanni & Cameron Newton, 2019. "Toward an Epidemiology of Safety and Security Risks: An Organizational Vulnerability Assessment in International Airports," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(6), pages 1281-1297, June.
    6. Langdalen, Henrik & Abrahamsen, Eirik Bjorheim & Selvik, Jon Tømmerås, 2020. "On the importance of systems thinking when using the ALARP principle for risk management," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    7. Hasan Dinçer & Serhat Yüksel & Seçil Şenel, 2018. "Analyzing the Global Risks for the Financial Crisis after the Great Depression Using Comparative Hybrid Hesitant Fuzzy Decision-Making Models: Policy Recommendations for Sustainable Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-15, September.
    8. Liangdong Lu & Hong Huang & Jiuchang Wei & Jia Xu, 2020. "Safety Regulations and the Uncertainty of Work‐Related Road Accident Loss: The Triple Identity of Chinese Local Governments Under Principal–Agent Framework," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(6), pages 1168-1182, June.
    9. Wei Wang & Francesco Di Maio & Enrico Zio, 2019. "Adversarial Risk Analysis to Allocate Optimal Defense Resources for Protecting Cyber–Physical Systems from Cyber Attacks," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(12), pages 2766-2785, December.
    10. Jason Thistlethwaite, 2017. "The Emergence of Flood Insurance in Canada: Navigating Institutional Uncertainty," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(4), pages 744-755, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:vgmu00:2021:i:3:p:200-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ирина Александровна Зверева (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://vgmu.hse.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.