IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/mngsci/y2018i2p30-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Оценка влияния неблагоприятной экономической и геополитической ситуации на стоимость российских нефтегазовых компаний // Assessment of the Impact of the Adverse Economic Geopolitical Environment on the Worth of Russian Oil and Gas Companies

Author

Listed:
  • V. Lipatnikov S.

    (National Research University “Higher School of Economics”, Saint-Petersburg)

  • K. Kirsanova A.

    (Financial University, Moscow)

  • В. Липатников С.

    (Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики», Санкт-Петербург)

  • К. Кирсанова А.

    (Финансовый университет, Москва)

Abstract

The relevance of the chosen topic is connected to the fact that in the conditions of value-based management, market capitalization acts as a key indicator of the company efficiency. At the present time, when the Russian oil and gas industry has become the object of international sectoral sanctions, the identification of the impact of these sanctions on the domestic oil and gas companies’ value is of great practical importance. The article considers the cost of oil and gas companies and the impact of sectoral sanctions and negative dynamics of oil prices. The study was conducted using econometric modeling tools. For analysis 4 of the oil company with the largest market share, namely PJSC “Rosneft Oil Company”, PJSC “LUKOIL”, JSC “Gazprom Neft” and PJSC “Tatneft”, which in the aggregate represent 62% of the entire Russian oil industry, were selected. The features of valuation of Russian oil and gas companies are covered. The sanctions in the oil and gas industry of the Russian Federation are considered, the consequences of their introduction and the fall of the world oil price are analysed. The analysis to determine the impact of the cost of oil and gas companies from international sanctions and oil prices. It was found that in the oil industry market capitalization depends directly on the price of oil, and in the gas industry this impact is absent. It was discovered that due to the low level of oil prices, the sanctions did not have a significant influence on the cost of oil and gas companies. Актуальность выбранной темы связана с тем, что в условиях менеджмента, ориентированного на стоимость, рыночная капитализация выступает в качестве ключевого показателя эффективности деятельности компаний. В настоящее время, когда российская нефтегазовая отрасль стала объектом воздействия международных секторальных санкций, выявление влияния этих санкций на стоимость отечественных компаний нефтегазового сектора имеет большое практическое значение. В работе рассмотрены стоимость нефтегазовых компаний и влияние на нее секторальных санкций и негативной динамики цен на нефть. Исследование проводилось при помощи инструментов эконометрического моделирования. Для анализа были выбраны 4 нефтяные компании с наибольшей долей на рынке, а именно ПАО «НК «Роснефть», ПАО «Лукойл», ПАО «Газпром нефть» и ПАО «Татнефть», которые в совокупности составляют 62% всей российской нефтяной отрасли. Освещены особенности оценки стоимости российских нефтегазовых компаний. Рассмотрены санкции в нефтегазовой отрасли РФ, проанализированы последствия их введения и падения мировой цены на нефть. Проведен анализ влияния международных санкций на конъюнктуру цен на нефть и стоимость нефтяных и газовых компаний. Было установлено, что в нефтяной отрасли рыночная капитализация напрямую зависит от цены на нефть, а в газовой отрасли данное влияние отсутствует. Было выявлено, что из-за низкого уровня цен на нефть санкции не оказали значительного влияния на стоимость нефтегазовых компаний.

Suggested Citation

  • V. Lipatnikov S. & K. Kirsanova A. & В. Липатников С. & К. Кирсанова А., 2018. "Оценка влияния неблагоприятной экономической и геополитической ситуации на стоимость российских нефтегазовых компаний // Assessment of the Impact of the Adverse Economic Geopolitical Environment on th," Управленческие науки // Management Science, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 8(2), pages 30-43.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:mngsci:y:2018:i:2:p:30-43
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://managementscience.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/147/151.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Misund, Bård & Asche, Frank & Osmundsen, Petter, 2008. "Industry upheaval and valuation: Empirical evidence from the international oil and gas industry," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 398-424, December.
    2. Ewing, Bradley T. & Thompson, Mark A., 2016. "The role of reserves and production in the market capitalization of oil and gas companies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 576-581.
    3. Apergis, Nicholas & Ewing, Bradley T. & Payne, James E., 2016. "A time series analysis of oil production, rig count and crude oil price: Evidence from six U.S. oil producing regions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 339-349.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Apergis, Nicholas & Ewing, Bradley T. & Payne, James E., 2021. "The asymmetric relationship of oil prices and production on drilling rig trajectory," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    2. Tega Anighoro, 2020. "Value relevance of the components of oil and gas reserve quantity change disclosures of upstream oil and gas companies in the london stock exchange," Papers 2005.14659, arXiv.org.
    3. Pastor, Daniel J. & Ewing, Bradley T., 2022. "Exploding DUCs? Identifying periods of mild explosivity in the time series behavior of drilled but uncompleted wells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PB).
    4. Bård Misund, 2017. "Accounting method choice and market valuation in the extractive industries," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1408944-140, January.
    5. Jin, Lu & Hawthorne, Steven & Sorensen, James & Pekot, Lawrence & Kurz, Bethany & Smith, Steven & Heebink, Loreal & Herdegen, Volker & Bosshart, Nicholas & Torres, José & Dalkhaa, Chantsalmaa & Peters, 2017. "Advancing CO2 enhanced oil recovery and storage in unconventional oil play—Experimental studies on Bakken shales," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 171-183.
    6. Nenubari John Ikue & Lucky Ifeanyi Amabuike & Joseph Osaro Denwi & Aminu Usman Mohammed & Ahmadu Uba Musa, 2021. "Economic growth and crude oil revenue in Nigeria: A control for industrial shocks," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(8), pages 218-227, December.
    7. Equiza-Goñi, Juan & de Gracia, Fernando Perez, 2020. "Impact of proved reserves on stock returns of U.S. oil and gas corporations using firm-level data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    8. Syeda Tayyaba Ijaz & Sumayya Chughtai, 2022. "The Impact of Financial, Economic and Environmental Factors on Energy Efficiency, Intensity, and Dependence: The Moderating Role of Governance and Institutional Quality," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(4), pages 15-31, July.
    9. Bård Misund & Petter Osmundsen, 2017. "Valuation of proved vs. probable oil and gas reserves," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 1385443-138, January.
    10. Frank Asche & Bård Misund, 2016. "Who’s a major? A novel approach to peer group selection: Empirical evidence from oil and gas companies," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1264538-126, December.
    11. Saud Althaqeb, 2017. "Survey of Energy Finance on the Corporate World," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 7(6), pages 153-158.
    12. Magne Emhjellen & Petter Osmundsen, 2013. "CCS - Failing to Pass Decision Gates," CESifo Working Paper Series 4525, CESifo.
    13. Misund, Bård & Osmundsen, Petter, 2015. "Probable Oil and Gas Reserves and Shareholder Returns: The Impact of Shale Gas," UiS Working Papers in Economics and Finance 2015/17, University of Stavanger.
    14. Nguyen, Phong Thanh & Nguyen, Linh Thi My, 2022. "Understanding platform market value through decentralization governance — An integrative model from signaling and mechanism design theory," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    15. Visani, Franco & Di Lascio, F. Marta L. & Gardini, Silvia, 2020. "The impact of institutional and cultural factors on the use of non-GAAP financial measures. International evidence from the oil and gas industry," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    16. Comincioli, Nicola & Hagspiel, Verena & Kort, Peter M. & Menoncin, Francesco & Miniaci, Raffaele & Vergalli, Sergio, 2021. "Mothballing in a Duopoly: Evidence from a (Shale) Oil Market," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    17. repec:ces:ceswps:_4944 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Jamil, Faisal, 2024. "Empirical analysis of investment in Pakistan’s upstream sector," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    19. Karanfil, Fatih & Omgba, Luc Désiré, 2017. "Reconsidering the scarcity factor in the dynamics of oil markets: An empirical investigation of the (mis)measurement of oil reserves," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 209-218.
    20. Radu-Alexandru Șerban & Diana Marieta Mihaiu & Mihai Țichindelean, 2022. "Environment, Social, and Governance Score and Value Added Impacts on Market Capitalization: A Sectoral-Based Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-25, February.
    21. Douglas Mugabe & Levan Elbakidze & Tim Carr, 2021. "All the DUCs in a Row: Natural Gas Production in U.S," The Energy Journal, , vol. 42(3), pages 113-132, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:mngsci:y:2018:i:2:p:30-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://managementscience.elpub.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.