IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/financ/y2016i3p100-106.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Активизация Рынка Ценных Бумаг И Механизмы Участия Государства // Making More Active The Securities Market And Mechanisms Of State Participation

Author

Listed:
  • S. Cholbaeva D.

    (Kyrgyz Economic University named after M. Ryskulbekov)

  • С. Чолбаева Д.

    (Кыргызский экономический университет имени М. Рыскулбекова)

Abstract

The scope and methods of attracting financial resources in different countries have specific features; however at the current stage of the global financial market development, a significant part of financial resources is attracted by issuing securities. The securities market in the Kyrgyz Republic emerged in the time of the privatization of state enterprises in different economic sectors. The first issuers appeared; they were joint-stock companies, investors and professional players of the securities market. It is known that dynamically developing economy is based on the development of the financial market of the country. The volume of the stock market shows not only its development at the moment, but also it is a good base to draw conclusions about all the economy in general. The stock market is often called a “mirror of the economy.” The analysis shows that unlike Russia, the Kyrgyz Republic has no experience in making transactions using financial derivatives on the domestic and foreign markets as well as in hedging price risks on the currency, oil or stock markets. The main reason for the lag is the lack of legislative framework for markets of derivative financial instruments. Масштабы и способы привлечения финансовых ресурсов в разных странах имеют свою специфику, тем не менее на современном этапе развития мирового финансового рынка значительная часть финансовых ресурсов привлекается посредством эмиссии ценных бумаг. Зарождение рынка ценных бумаг в Кыргызстане было обусловлено проведением приватизации государственных предприятий различных отраслей экономики. Появились эмитенты - акционерные общества, инвесторы и профессиональные участники рынка ценных бумаг. Известно, что динамично развивающаяся экономика базируется на развитом финансовом рынке страны. По объемам фондового рынка можно не только судить о его развитии в текущий момент, но и делать выводы об экономике в целом. Поэтому фондовый рынок часто называют «зеркалом экономики». Проведенный анализ показал, что в Республике Кыргызстан не существует опыта заключения предпринимателями сделок с производными финансовыми инструментами на внутреннем и внешнем рынках, хеджирования ценовых рисков на валютном и нефтяном рынках, на зарубежных биржах (в отличие, например, от России). Главная причина отставания - отсутствие законодательных основ функционирования рынков производных финансовых инструментов.

Suggested Citation

  • S. Cholbaeva D. & С. Чолбаева Д., 2016. "Активизация Рынка Ценных Бумаг И Механизмы Участия Государства // Making More Active The Securities Market And Mechanisms Of State Participation," Финансы: теория и практика/Finance: Theory and Practice // Finance: Theory and Practice, ФГОБУВО Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 20(3), pages 100-106.
  • Handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2016:i:3:p:100-106
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://financetp.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/415/342.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas I. Palley, 1996. "Post Keynesian Economics," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-37412-6, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eckhard Hein, 2006. "Money, interest and capital accumulationin Karl Marx's economics: a monetary interpretation and some similaritiesto post-Keynesian approaches," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 113-140.
    2. Eckhard Hein, 2007. "Interest Rate, Debt, Distribution And Capital Accumulation In A Post‐Kaleckian Model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 310-339, May.
    3. Thomas I. Palley, 2013. "Horizontalists, verticalists, and structuralists: the theory of endogenous money reassessed," Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 1(4), pages 406—424-4, OCT.
    4. Ingo Barens & Volker Caspari, 1999. "Old views and new perspectives: on reading Hick's 'Mr. Keynes and the Classics'," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 216-241.
    5. Gilberto Tadeu Lima & Antonio J. A. Meirelles, 2007. "Macrodynamics of debt regimes, financial instability and growth," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 31(4), pages 563-580, July.
    6. Asensio, Angel & Charles, Sébastien & Lang, Dany & Le Heron, Edwin, 2011. "Les développements récents de la macroéconomie post-keynésienne," Revue de la Régulation - Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoirs, Association Recherche et Régulation, vol. 10.
    7. Heise, Arne, 2018. "Postkeynesianismus: Ein heterodoxer Ansatz auf der Suche nach einer Fundierung," ZÖSS-Discussion Papers 69, University of Hamburg, Centre for Economic and Sociological Studies (CESS/ZÖSS).
    8. Cavalieri, Duccio, 2013. "On the interdependence of money supply and demand," MPRA Paper 44428, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Leonardo Vera, 2017. "The Distribution of Power and the Inflation-Unemployment Relationship in the United States: A Post-Keynesian Approach," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 49(2), pages 265-285, June.
    10. Giuseppe Fontana & Bill Gerrard, 2006. "The future of Post Keynesian economics," BNL Quarterly Review, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 59(236), pages 49-80.
    11. Richard Grabowski & Michael P. Shields, 2000. "A Dynamic, Keynesian Model of Development," Journal of Economic Development, Chung-Ang Unviersity, Department of Economics, vol. 25(1), pages 1-15, June.
    12. Marc Lavoie & Wynne Godley, 2000. "Kaleckian Models of Growth in a Stock-Flow Monetary Framework: A Neo-Kaldorian Model," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_302, Levy Economics Institute.
    13. Silvano Cincotti & Wolfram Elsner & Nathalie Lazaric & Anastasia Nesvetailova & Engelbert Stockhammer, 2020. "Towards an evolutionary political economy. Editorial to the inaugural issue of the Review of Evolutionary Political Economy REPE," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-12, May.
    14. Antonio Meirelles & Gilberto Lima, 2006. "Debt, financial fragility, and economic growth: a Post Keynesian macromodel," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 93-115.
    15. Stavroula DIMKOU & George MAKRIS, 2017. "Financial Sector And Growth Process In South-Eastern Europe'S Former Socialist Countries: Could A Kaldorian Cumulative Causation Approach Help To Better Understand The Links Between Them?," Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, vol. 16(1), pages 60-73.
    16. Hein, Eckhard, 2010. "The rate of interest as a macroeconomic distribution parameter: Horizontalism and Post-Keynesian models of distribution of growth," MPRA Paper 23372, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Sebastien Charles, 2008. "A Post-Keynesian Model of Accumulation with a Minskyan Financial Structure," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(3), pages 319-331.
    18. Orlando Gomes, 2010. "Endogenous Growth, Price Stability And Market Disequilibria," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 3-34, February.
    19. Holtemöller, Oliver, 2002. "Money and banks: Some theory and empirical evidence for Germany," SFB 373 Discussion Papers 2002,17, Humboldt University of Berlin, Interdisciplinary Research Project 373: Quantification and Simulation of Economic Processes.
    20. Engelbert Stockhammer, 2008. "Is The Nairu Theory A Monetarist, New Keynesian, Post Keynesian Or A Marxist Theory?," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 479-510, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:financ:y:2016:i:3:p:100-106. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://financetp.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.