IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/scn/accntn/y2019i4p61-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Плюсы и минусы государственных заимствований и государственного долга для бюджетной системы России // Pros and Cons of Public Borrowing and Public Debt for the Russian Budget System

Author

Listed:
  • N. Parasotskaya N.

    (LLC “MMTI”)

  • N. Yakovlev D.

    (Financial University)

  • Н. Парасоцкая Н.

    (ООО «ММТИ»)

  • Н. Яковлев Д.

    (Финансовый университет)

Abstract

The article is devoted to the advantages and disadvantages of debt instruments to finance government needs. This topic is relevant because the current economic situation in conjunction with the tasks of breakthrough development requires a sufficient level of sustainability of public finance. To substantiate in detail the possibility of using public debt the article describes the basic peculiarities of budgeting mechanism: what a budget is, its revenue and expenditure, effective budget balancing in case of budget deficit. Within the given framework, the author focuses on the essence of public debt and borrowing, determines their place in the budgeting mechanism, reviews foreign experience and identifies advantages and disadvantages of this tool which makes it possible to assess the necessity of applying this mechanism. The conclusion is made that using public borrowing is appropriate because it provides an opportunity for budget maneuvering and helps to mitigate negative consequences of economic shocks but it is necessary to take into account the current economic situation along with the risks of financial stability, thus to conduct a balanced debt policy. В статье рассматриваются особенности применения долговых инструментов финансирования задач государства с позиции анализа положительных и отрицательных аспектов, поскольку современная экономическая конъюнктура в совокупности с поставленными задачами прорывного развития требует достаточного уровня устойчивости государственных финансов. Для подробного обоснования возможности применения государственных заимствований в статье описаны базовые особенности функционирования бюджетного механизма: раскрыты сущность бюджета, его доходов и расходов, поставлен вопрос об эффективном обеспечении сбалансированности в случае образования дефицита. Далее в рамках решаемых задач раскрыты сущность госдолга и заимствований, определено их место в бюджетировании, проанализирован зарубежный опыт и выявлены плюсы и минусы данного инструмента. Формулировка плюсов и минусов позволила дать оценку необходимости применения данного инструмента. Таким образом, сделан вывод, что применение государственных заимствований целесообразно, поскольку дает возможность для проведения бюджетных маневров и позволяет сдерживать негативное воздействие шоков на экономику страны, однако необходимо соотносить это с текущей экономической конъюнктурой и рисками финансовой устойчивости, проводя взвешенную долговую политику.

Suggested Citation

  • N. Parasotskaya N. & N. Yakovlev D. & Н. Парасоцкая Н. & Н. Яковлев Д., 2019. "Плюсы и минусы государственных заимствований и государственного долга для бюджетной системы России // Pros and Cons of Public Borrowing and Public Debt for the Russian Budget System," Учет. Анализ. Аудит // Accounting. Analysis. Auditing, ФГОБУВО "Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации" // Financial University under The Government of Russian Federation, vol. 6(4), pages 61-69.
    • Handle: RePEc:scn:accntn:y:2019:i:4:p:61-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://accounting.fa.ru/jour/article/viewFile/273/266.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Croce, M.M. & Nguyen, Thien T. & Raymond, S. & Schmid, L., 2019. "Government debt and the returns to innovation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(3), pages 205-225.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan, Jianyong & Liu, Yu & Zhang, Qi & Zhao, Peng, 2022. "Does government debt impede firm innovation? Evidence from the rise of LGFVs in China," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Zhengyang Jiang & Hanno Lustig & Stijn Van Nieuwerburgh & Mindy Z. Xiaolan, 2024. "The U.S. Public Debt Valuation Puzzle," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 92(4), pages 1309-1347, July.
    3. Bretscher, Lorenzo & Hsu, Alex & Tamoni, Andrea, 2020. "Fiscal policy driven bond risk premia," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 53-73.
    4. Gross, Till & Klein, Paul, 2022. "Optimal tax policy and endogenous growth through innovation," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    5. Parastoo Mousavi, 2021. "Debt-by-Price Ratio, End-of-Year Economic Growth, and Long-Term Prediction of Stock Returns," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(13), pages 1-18, July.
    6. Zhu, Jun & Xu, Haokun & Zhang, Yue, 2022. "Local government debt and firm productivity: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    7. Chen, Wen & Zhu, Yufeng & He, Zehui & Yang, Yang, 2022. "The effect of local government debt on green innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed companies," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    8. Yang Liu & Amir Yaron & Lukas Schmid, 2019. "The Risks of Safe Assets," 2019 Meeting Papers 1418, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    9. Van Nieuwerburgh, Stijn & Elenev, Vadim & Landvoigt, Tim & Shultz, Patrick, 2021. "Can Monetary Policy Create Fiscal Capacity?," CEPR Discussion Papers 16414, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. Liu, Yang & Shaliastovich, Ivan, 2022. "Government policy approval and exchange rates," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 303-331.
    11. Wang, Jiaxin & Huang, Xiang & Gu, Qiankun & Song, Zilong & Sun, Ruiyi, 2023. "How does fintech affect bank risk? A perspective based on financialized transfer of government implicit debt risk," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    12. Liu, Yang, 2023. "Government debt and risk premia," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 18-34.
    13. Qiong Zhou & Qian Tan & Huixiang Zeng & Yu-En Lin & Peng Zhu, 2023. "Does Soil Pollution Prevention and Control Promote Corporate Sustainable Development? A Quasi-Natural Experiment of “10-Point Soil Plan” in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, March.
    14. Chi, Meiqing & Muhammad, Sulaman & Khan, Zeeshan & Ali, Shahid & Li, Rita Yi Man, 2021. "Is centralization killing innovation? The success story of technological innovation in fiscally decentralized countries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    15. Shen, Zhihan & Zhang, Ruipeng & Li, Peigong, 2024. "Local government debt and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 985-1000.
    16. Chi, Jianxin Daniel & Su, Xunhua & Tang, Yun & Xu, Bin, 2020. "Is language an economic institution? Evidence from R&D investment," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    17. Paweł Radwański, 2024. "Impact of tax changes on the risk premium of the WIG index," Bank i Kredyt, Narodowy Bank Polski, vol. 55(3), pages 333-356.
    18. Chen, Suyun & Li, Zongze & Xie, Feixue & Xu, Xiaofang, 2024. "The signaling effect of local government debt: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PA).
    19. Umeair Shahzad & Fukai Luo & Jing Liu, 2023. "Debt financing and technology investment Kuznets curve: Evidence from China," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(1), pages 751-765, January.
    20. Amin, Md Ruhul & Wang, Xinyu & Aktas, Elvan, 2023. "Does oil price uncertainty affect corporate innovation?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:scn:accntn:y:2019:i:4:p:61-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Алексей Скалабан (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://accounting.fa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.