IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v4y1990i1p31-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Road to Recovery? Some Evidence from Vacancies in One Labour Market

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Marsh

    (Department of Sociology University of Manchester MANCHESTER M28 4QJ)

  • Roisin McAuley

    (Department of Sociology University of Manchester MANCHESTER M28 4QJ)

  • Siân Penlington

    (Department of Sociology University of Manchester MANCHESTER M28 4QJ)

Abstract

Even during times of high unemployment, one often hears people express the view that there are plenty of jobs available for those who want to work. Indeed, recent government policy rests on the truth of this assumption. After criticising some of the survey evidence purportedly documenting a flourishing vacancy situation nationally, the paper presents a test of the assumption in Chesterfield in the summer of 1988. The assumption is shown to be wanting. The sheer number of vacancies was not large and certainly not sufficient for the number of unemployed in the locality. The jobs that were on offer were not attractive in terms of pay and conditions. A minority of the jobs were for full-time, permanent positions. Casualised working conditions, non-standard hours, self-employment and low pay featured predominantly. There was little evidence of a skills gap. Nonetheless, virtually all the jobs were being taken, the majority by people already in work. Falling unemployment figures alone must not be taken as heralding an economic recovery, since it seems that many are simply leaving the register.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Marsh & Roisin McAuley & Siân Penlington, 1990. "The Road to Recovery? Some Evidence from Vacancies in One Labour Market," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 4(1), pages 31-58, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:4:y:1990:i:1:p:31-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wes.sagepub.com/content/4/1/31.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:4:y:1990:i:1:p:31-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.