IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v38y2024i6p1658-1679.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Welfare Conditionality on Experiences of Job Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Katy Jones

    (Manchester Metropolitan University, UK)

  • Sharon Wright

    (University of Glasgow, UK)

  • Lisa Scullion

    (University of Salford, UK)

Abstract

This article contributes to emerging debates about how behavioural conditionality within welfare systems influences job quality. Drawing upon analysis of unique data from three waves of qualitative longitudinal interviews with 46 UK social security recipients (133 interviews), we establish that the impact of welfare conditionality is so substantial that it is no longer adequate to discuss job quality without reference to its interconnections to the welfare system. More specifically, we identify how conditionality drives welfare recipients’ experience of four core dimensions of job quality: disempowering and propelling claimants towards inadequate pay, insecurity and poor employment terms, undermining multiple intrinsic characteristics of work and creating what we term a new ‘Work–Life–Welfare balance’. Instead of acting as a neutral arbitrator between jobseekers and employers, the welfare system is exposed as complicit in reinforcing one-sided flexibility through one-sided conditionality, by emphasising intensive job-seeking, while leaving poor-quality work provided by employers unchecked.

Suggested Citation

  • Katy Jones & Sharon Wright & Lisa Scullion, 2024. "The Impact of Welfare Conditionality on Experiences of Job Quality," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(6), pages 1658-1679, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:38:y:2024:i:6:p:1658-1679
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170231219677
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170231219677
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170231219677?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:38:y:2024:i:6:p:1658-1679. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.