IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v38y2024i6p1549-1568.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relational Responsibilisation and Diversity Management in the 21st Century: The Case for Reframing Equality Regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Steve Vincent

    (Newcastle University, UK)

  • Ana Lopes

    (Newcastle University, UK)

  • Elina Meliou

    (Brunel University London, UK)

  • Mustafa Özbilgin

    (Brunel University London, UK)

Abstract

This article critiques equality regulation within neoliberal policy regimes and suggests an alternative. We argue that, globally, neoliberal regimes exacerbate social divisions by individualising responsibilities for addressing inequalities. Consequentially, a new policy direction for equality regulation is required. Using the UK economy as an exemplar, we make the case for relational responsibilisation, which involves raising awareness of workplace inequalities on an international basis; attributing responsibility for inequalities onto specific socioeconomic causes and institutions; and systematically developing policies and practices that extend accountability for and ameliorate the negative consequences of workplace inequalities. Theoretically, Bourdieusian social critique and realist sociological imagination are used to conceive responsibilisation in relational terms and to imagine a policy agenda that might make societies more responsible for tackling the forms of inequality they produce. Our overall argument is for the creation of a new equality, diversity and inclusion-aware form of social democracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Steve Vincent & Ana Lopes & Elina Meliou & Mustafa Özbilgin, 2024. "Relational Responsibilisation and Diversity Management in the 21st Century: The Case for Reframing Equality Regulation," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(6), pages 1549-1568, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:38:y:2024:i:6:p:1549-1568
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170231217660
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170231217660
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170231217660?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:38:y:2024:i:6:p:1549-1568. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.