IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v38y2024i6p1528-1548.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market Dependence as a Boundary Construction for Work Solidarity with the Solo Self-employed

Author

Listed:
  • Isabell Kathrin Stamm

    (Max-Planck-Institute for the Study of Societies, Germany)

  • Lena Schürmann

    (Humboldt – Universität zu Berlin, Germany)

  • Katharina Scheidgen

    (Universität Göttingen, Germany)

Abstract

As more people work outside standard employment, the foundations of work solidarity are contested. How does work solidarity arise in atypical forms of work that are characterised by flexible, autonomous and self-dependent organisation, such as in solo self-employment? Drawing on a discursive approach to work solidarity, this article emphasises how market dependence can serve as a boundary construction to create work solidarity. Empirically, this study engages in a discourse analysis on Soforthilfe , a policy measure introduced by the German government to financially assist solo self-employed people during the Covid-19 lockdown. In this discourse, market dependence serves to identify this social group’s need (social boundary) and to set out the corresponding policies for financial assistance (substantive boundary). Four solidarity norms – relief, equality, preservation and quasi-equivalence – support this boundary construction. The article contributes to the current discourse on work solidarity by identifying an additional boundary construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Isabell Kathrin Stamm & Lena Schürmann & Katharina Scheidgen, 2024. "Market Dependence as a Boundary Construction for Work Solidarity with the Solo Self-employed," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 38(6), pages 1528-1548, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:38:y:2024:i:6:p:1528-1548
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170231206083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170231206083
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170231206083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:38:y:2024:i:6:p:1528-1548. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.