IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v37y2023i3p757-775.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualising ‘Within-Group Stigmatisation’ among High-Status Workers

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew Bamber

    (York University, UK)

  • John McCormack

    (Cardiff Metropolitan University, UK)

  • Brent J Lyons

    (York University, UK)

Abstract

This article explores the identity challenges facing teaching-only faculty (TOF), whose occupational self-perceptions are fundamentally contradicted by the way institutional others perceive them. We show how this manifests into a set of stigmatising practices and processes across two dimensions: contact (informal messaging) and contract (formal messaging). The sense of being unjustly stigmatised is amplified because the teaching-only role is generally seen as high-status by outsiders, and the work itself is relatively free from real or metaphorical dirt. Hence, we propose the concept of within-group stigmatisation. Next, we shine light on the implications of this form of occupational stigmatisation through the lens of organisational (dis)identification. In contrast to theoretical expectations, the analysis of our extensive survey and interview data shows that TOF identify with their role but disidentify with the organisation. Finally, we reflect on the importance and broader applicability of our concept of within-group occupational stigmatisation.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew Bamber & John McCormack & Brent J Lyons, 2023. "Conceptualising ‘Within-Group Stigmatisation’ among High-Status Workers," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 37(3), pages 757-775, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:37:y:2023:i:3:p:757-775
    DOI: 10.1177/09500170211041287
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09500170211041287
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09500170211041287?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:37:y:2023:i:3:p:757-775. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.