IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v36y2022i4p610-629.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deservingness, Conditionality and Public Perceptions of Work Disability: The Influence of Economic Inequality

Author

Listed:
  • Rossella Ciccia

    (Oxford University, UK)

  • Declan French

    (Queen’s University Belfast, UK)

  • Frank Kee

    (Queen’s University Belfast, UK)

  • Mark O’Doherty

    (Queen’s University Belfast, UK)

Abstract

This article contributes to classical debates about the role of self-interest and social norms in shaping the moral economy of work and welfare by incorporating economic inequalities in the analysis of opinions about welfare deservingness. The relationship between inequality and perceptions of work conditionality has received little attention in previous studies. This article addresses this issue by investigating the association between economic inequalities and perceived work limitations of disabled people experiencing various conditions related to health using vignettes from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. The results show that people living in areas with higher levels of wealth inequality, but not income inequality, were more likely to rate the vignettes as limited in the amount of work that individuals can do due to health problems. This finding casts doubts on the crucial role attributed to self-interest as the central mechanism linking economic inequality and solidaristic, pro-welfare attitudes.

Suggested Citation

  • Rossella Ciccia & Declan French & Frank Kee & Mark O’Doherty, 2022. "Deservingness, Conditionality and Public Perceptions of Work Disability: The Influence of Economic Inequality," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 36(4), pages 610-629, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:36:y:2022:i:4:p:610-629
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017020967229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017020967229
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017020967229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:36:y:2022:i:4:p:610-629. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.