IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v33y2019i4p666-681.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Job Satisfaction and Bad Jobs: Why Are Cleaners So Happy at Work?

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandre Léné

Abstract

Our analysis is based on the French DARES Working Conditions survey which contains a very large sample of individuals representative of the French working population. We demonstrate that employees working in the cleaning sector report significantly higher levels of satisfaction than the other employees. This statistical result is robust; it persists when we introduce a large number of control variables. This result is puzzling insofar as it is generally agreed that these workers hold ‘poor quality’ jobs: low pay, an abnormal pattern of work, arduous working conditions. We suggest that cleaners’ expectations and standards are influenced by an adaptation process. Their job satisfaction needs to be considered in the light of their past experience. Their employment history shapes their wants and needs and thus affects the way they evaluate their work.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandre Léné, 2019. "Job Satisfaction and Bad Jobs: Why Are Cleaners So Happy at Work?," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 33(4), pages 666-681, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:33:y:2019:i:4:p:666-681
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017019828904
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017019828904
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017019828904?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:33:y:2019:i:4:p:666-681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.