IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v33y2019i4p560-579.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Bad’ Jobs in a ‘Good’ Sector: Examining the Employment Outcomes of Temporary Work in the Canadian Public Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Natasha Stecy-Hildebrandt

    (University of British Columbia, Canada)

  • Sylvia Fuller

    (University of British Columbia, Canada)

  • Alisyn Burns

    (University of British Columbia, Canada)

Abstract

Canada’s public sector has historically provided good jobs, but its increasing reliance on temporary workers has important implications for job quality. We compare temporary and permanent workers in the public sector on three dimensions of job quality (employment security, access to benefits and income trajectories) to assess whether favourable conditions in the public sector are extended to temporary employees, or whether polarization between temporary and permanent workers is the norm. We find provisions related to employment security and access to leave benefits in public sector collective bargains are clearly two-tiered. Drawing on nationally representative panel data, we also find a persistent earnings gap between matched permanent and temporary employees. Further, although temporary public sector workers out-earn their private sector counterparts, the earnings disadvantage relative to matched permanent workers is more pronounced and longer lasting in the public sector. Underlying this difference is greater persistence in temporary employment within the public sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Natasha Stecy-Hildebrandt & Sylvia Fuller & Alisyn Burns, 2019. "‘Bad’ Jobs in a ‘Good’ Sector: Examining the Employment Outcomes of Temporary Work in the Canadian Public Sector," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 33(4), pages 560-579, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:33:y:2019:i:4:p:560-579
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017018758217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017018758217
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017018758217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:33:y:2019:i:4:p:560-579. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.