IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v28y2014i6p904-925.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unemployment and attitudes to work: asking the ‘right’ question

Author

Listed:
  • Andrew Dunn

    (University of Lincoln, UK)

  • Maria T Grasso

    (University of Sheffield, UK)

  • Clare Saunders

    (University of Exeter, UK)

Abstract

Attitudes research has repeatedly demonstrated that the vast majority of unemployed people want a job and that their employment commitment is generally at least as strong as employed people’s. However, until now it has not asked if they are more likely than employed people to prefer unemployment to an unattractive job. While this oversight reflects a noted widespread reluctance to respond directly to right-wing authors’ assertions, this article argues that it is partly attributable to existing studies using survey questions inappropriate for researching unemployment. Responses to the British Cohort Study/National Child Development Study agree/disagree statement ‘having almost any job is better than being unemployed’ were analysed. Being ‘unemployed and seeking work’ associated strongly with disagreeing with the statement across all recent datasets in both studies, even when a number of relevant variables were controlled for.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrew Dunn & Maria T Grasso & Clare Saunders, 2014. "Unemployment and attitudes to work: asking the ‘right’ question," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 28(6), pages 904-925, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:28:y:2014:i:6:p:904-925
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wes.sagepub.com/content/28/6/904.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Simona Demel & Petr Mariel & Luis Miller, 2018. "Education and the Non-financial Employment Commitment in Times of Economic Recession Among the Youth," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 795-810, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:28:y:2014:i:6:p:904-925. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.