IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v25y2011i3p487-505.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining career motivation among female doctors in the Netherlands: the effects of children, views on motherhood and work-home cultures

Author

Listed:
  • Berber Pas
  • Pascale Peters
  • Rob Eisinga
  • Hans Doorewaard
  • Toine Lagro-Janssen

Abstract

The gender imbalance in senior medical positions is often attributed to an alleged lack of motivation on the part of female doctors, especially those with young children. Some researchers argue that an unsupportive work-home culture in the medical workplace also plays a role. This study investigates whether having children (and the age of the youngest child) affects female doctors’ career motivation and whether this relationship is mediated by views on motherhood and the supportiveness of the work-home culture. Cross-sectional data collected on 1070 Dutch female doctors in 2008 indicates that neither having children nor the age of the youngest child significantly affects the career motivation of female doctors. However, views on motherhood and a supportive work-home culture do affect female doctors’ career motivation. Governmental and organizational policies aimed at maternal employment and improving the work-life balance are discussed in terms of their effectiveness in supporting highly educated working women.

Suggested Citation

  • Berber Pas & Pascale Peters & Rob Eisinga & Hans Doorewaard & Toine Lagro-Janssen, 2011. "Explaining career motivation among female doctors in the Netherlands: the effects of children, views on motherhood and work-home cultures," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 25(3), pages 487-505, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:25:y:2011:i:3:p:487-505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://wes.sagepub.com/content/25/3/487.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:25:y:2011:i:3:p:487-505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.