IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/woemps/v23y2009i2p249-266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The actuary as fallen hero: on the reform of a profession

Author

Listed:
  • David Collins

    (University of Essex, dscdlin@essex.ac.uk)

  • Ian Dewing

    (University of East Anglia, i.dewing@uea.ac.uk)

  • Peter Russell

    (University of East Anglia, p.o.russell@ueq.ac.uk)

Abstract

This article investigates reform of the actuarial profession following the establishment of the UK Financial Services Authority and as a result of the problems emerging at the Equitable Life Assurance Society. Perceptions on changes to the role of life actuaries are explored using interviews with senior actuaries and accountants. The study complements the few existing academic analyses of actuaries and yet challenges these analyses inasmuch as it locates actuarial work within a broader sociological frame. Thus, the article views the actuarial profession not as a simple collection of traits but as a dynamic socio-historical project that reflects and projects professional knowledge claims.The article concludes that the imposed reforms have rescued the actuarial profession from its failure to reform itself, at least in the short term. The main price to be paid is that regulation of the actuarial profession is firmly locked into the regulatory structures of the accountancy profession.

Suggested Citation

  • David Collins & Ian Dewing & Peter Russell, 2009. "The actuary as fallen hero: on the reform of a profession," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 23(2), pages 249-266, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:23:y:2009:i:2:p:249-266
    DOI: 10.1177/0950017009102857
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0950017009102857
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0950017009102857?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Morris, Derek, 2005. "Review of The Actuarial Profession," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 11(2), pages 313-313, June.
    2. Bellis, C.S., 2000. "Professions in Society," British Actuarial Journal, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 317-364, August.
    3. Veblen, Thorstein, 1921. "The Engineers and the Price System," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number veblen1921.
    4. Ian P. Dewing & Peter O. Russell, 2006. "Corporate Governance – Regulation and Reform: the actuarial governance of UK life insurers," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(3), pages 172-180, May.
    5. Sikka, Prem & Willmott, Hugh, 1995. "The power of "independence": defending and extending the jurisdiction of accounting in the United Kingdom," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 20(6), pages 547-581, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Divya Anantharaman, 2017. "The role of specialists in financial reporting: Evidence from pension accounting," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1261-1306, September.
    2. Power, Mike, 2015. "Building the behavioural balance sheet: An essay on Solvency 2," economic sociology. perspectives and conversations, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, vol. 17(1), pages 45-53.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cedric Durand & Céline Baud, 2023. "Profit-making, costs, and investments in the digitalization of retailing—The uneven trajectories of Carrefour, Amazon and Walmart (1995–2019)," Post-Print hal-04262663, HAL.
    2. Andrew P. Grieve, 2005. "The professionalization of the ‘shoe clerk’," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 168(4), pages 639-656, November.
    3. Erik S. Reinert, 2006. "European Integration, Innovations and Uneven Economic Growth: Challenges and Problems of EU 2005," The Other Canon Foundation and Tallinn University of Technology Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics 05, TUT Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance.
    4. Johan E. Eklund, 2009. "Corporate Governance and Investments in Scandinavia – Ownership Concentration and Dual-Class Equity Structure," Chapters, in: Per-Olof Bjuggren & Dennis C. Mueller (ed.), The Modern Firm, Corporate Governance and Investment, chapter 7, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. John P. Watkins, 2000. "Corporate Power and the Evolution of Consumer Credit," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 909-932, December.
    6. Zdravka Todorova, 2013. "Connecting social provisioning and functional finance in a post-Keynesian–Institutional analysis of the public sector," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 10(1), pages 61-75.
    7. Davanzati, Guglielmo Forges, 2018. "Structural change driven by institutions: Thorstein veblen revised," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 105-110.
    8. Apostol, Oana & Pop, Alina, 2019. "‘Paying taxes is losing money’: A qualitative study on institutional logics in the tax consultancy field in Romania," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-23.
    9. Velayutham, Sivakumar & Perera, Hector, 1996. "Recent developments in the accounting profession in New Zealand: A case of deprofessionalization?," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 445-462.
    10. Tae-Hee Jo, 2011. "A Heterodox Microfoundation of Business Cycles," Chapters, in: Joëlle Leclaire & Tae-Hee Jo & Jane Knodell (ed.), Heterodox Analysis of Financial Crisis and Reform, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Jane Broadbent & Richard Laughlin, 2005. "Government concerns and tensions in accounting standard-setting: the case of accounting for the Private Finance Initiative in the UK," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 207-228.
    12. John Brehm & Scott Gates, 1994. "When Supervision Fails to Induce Compliance," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 6(3), pages 323-343, July.
    13. Dragos Zelinschi, 2012. "Une loi suffit-elle ? Le mouvement des comptables roumains dans les années 1920," Post-Print hal-00691074, HAL.
    14. Subhasish Chowdhury & Oliver Gürtler, 2015. "Sabotage in contests: a survey," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 135-155, July.
    15. Alexis Stenfors & Lilian Muchimba, 2023. "The Anatomy of Three Scandals: Conspiracies, Beauty Contests, and Sabotage in OTC Markets," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(2), pages 538-545, April.
    16. Ronnie J. Phillips, 2000. "Digital Technology and Institutional Change from the Gilded Age to Modern Times: The Impact of the Telegraph and the Internet," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(2), pages 267-289, June.
    17. Monissen, Hans G., 1974. "Economics and the public purpose: Some discussion points related to chapter three of John K. Galbraith's homonymous book," Discussion Papers, Series I 50, University of Konstanz, Department of Economics.
    18. James V. Cornehls, 2004. "Veblen’s Theory of Finance Capitalism and Contemporary Corporate America," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 29-58, March.
    19. John F. Henry, 2017. "Fred Lee, the Industrial Workers of the World, and Heterodox Economics," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 49(1), pages 148-152, March.
    20. Faruk Ülgen, 2021. "Public good, collective action and financial regulation," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 92(1), pages 147-167, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:woemps:v:23:y:2009:i:2:p:249-266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.