IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v61y2024i13p2585-2602.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inhabiting digital spaces: An informational right to the city for mobility justice

Author

Listed:
  • Dian Nostikasari

    (Drake University, USA)

  • Nicole Foster

    (Northland College, USA)

  • Lauren Krake

    (Drake University, USA)

Abstract

Space is often produced digitally before it is produced physically. This article investigates how the right to the city can be broadened to include the appropriation of digital spaces to produce ‘lived’ transportation spaces. Focussing on mobilisation against highway expansion in Dallas, Texas, we ask the following: (1) what are the mechanisms through which space is conceived, perceived, and lived through the lens of mobility justice; (2) how might claims for technical information challenge dominant transportation policies and projects; and (3) how might participants inhabit digital spaces? We conduct a qualitative analysis of transportation planning narratives, visualisations, and public comments in three documents: the Dallas City Center Master Assessment Process, Coalition for a New Dallas’ I-345/45 Framework Plan, and public survey data regarding proposed highway changes ( n  = 1241). Findings demonstrate how residents challenge transportation ‘needs’ as often determined in conceptual planning spaces. Further, technologies can be appropriated to produce differential spaces, which can alter the trajectory of highway projects. Challenging the legitimacy of institutionalised knowledge through the appropriation and production of digital spaces forms part of a larger claim to the right of the city.

Suggested Citation

  • Dian Nostikasari & Nicole Foster & Lauren Krake, 2024. "Inhabiting digital spaces: An informational right to the city for mobility justice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(13), pages 2585-2602, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:61:y:2024:i:13:p:2585-2602
    DOI: 10.1177/00420980241244512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00420980241244512
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00420980241244512?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert Goodspeed, 2016. "Digital knowledge technologies in planning practice: from black boxes to media for collaborative inquiry," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(4), pages 577-600, October.
    2. Henrik Gudmundsson, 2011. "Analysing Models as a Knowledge Technology in Transport Planning," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(2), pages 145-159.
    3. Nazari Adli, Saeid & Donovan, Stuart, 2018. "Right to the city: Applying justice tests to public transport investments," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 56-65.
    4. Dian Nostikasari & Colleen Casey, 2020. "Institutional Barriers in the Coproduction of Knowledge for Transportation Planning," Planning Theory & Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(5), pages 671-691, October.
    5. Sanchez, Thomas W., 2008. "Poverty, policy, and public transportation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 833-841, June.
    6. Katharina Manderscheid, 2014. "The Movement Problem, the Car and Future Mobility Regimes: Automobility as Dispositif and Mode of Regulation," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(4), pages 604-626, September.
    7. Paul Timms, 2008. "Transport models, philosophy and language," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(3), pages 395-410, May.
    8. Fahimeh Khalaj & Dorina Pojani & Neil Sipe & Jonathan Corcoran, 2020. "Why are cities removing their freeways? A systematic review of the literature," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 557-580, July.
    9. Alex Karner & Richard Duckworth, 2019. "‘Pray for transit’: Seeking transportation justice in metropolitan Atlanta," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(9), pages 1882-1900, July.
    10. Catalina Ortiz, 2022. "Cultivating Urban Storytellers: A Radical Co-Creation to Enact Cognitive Justice for/in Self-Built Neighbourhoods," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 405-417.
    11. McAndrews, Carolyn & Marcus, Justine, 2015. "The politics of collective public participation in transportation decision-making," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 537-550.
    12. Barajas, Jesus, 2021. "Biking Where Black: Connecting Transportation Planning and Infrastructure to Disproportionate Policing," SocArXiv wszgv, Center for Open Science.
    13. Rogalsky, Jennifer, 2010. "The working poor and what GIS reveals about the possibilities of public transit," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 226-237.
    14. Verlinghieri, Ersilia & Venturini, Federico, 2018. "Exploring the right to mobility through the 2013 mobilizations in Rio de Janeiro," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 126-136.
    15. Blumenberg, Evelyn, 2009. "Moving In and Moving Around: Immigrants, Travel Behavior, and Implications for Transport Policy," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt5b5329tk, University of California Transportation Center.
    16. Jones, Peter & Lucas, Karen, 2012. "The social consequences of transport decision-making: clarifying concepts, synthesising knowledge and assessing implications," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 4-16.
    17. Nancy Cook & David Butz, 2016. "Mobility Justice in the Context of Disaster," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 400-419, July.
    18. Vigar, Geoff, 2017. "The four knowledges of transport planning: Enacting a more communicative, trans-disciplinary policy and decision-making," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 39-45.
    19. David J. Madden, 2014. "Neighborhood as Spatial Project: Making the Urban Order on the Downtown Brooklyn Waterfront," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 471-497, March.
    20. Gwendolyn Y. Purifoye, 2020. "Transit boundaries: race and the paradox of immobility within mobile systems," Mobilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 480-499, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lowe, Kate & Barajas, Jesus & Coren, Chelsie, 2023. "“It's annoying, confusing, and it's irritating”: Lived expertise for epistemic justice and understanding inequitable accessibility," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    2. Verlinghieri, Ersilia, 2020. "Learning from the grassroots: A resourcefulness-based worldview for transport planning," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 364-377.
    3. Smeds, Emilia & Robin, Enora & McArthur, Jenny, 2020. "Night-time mobilities and (in)justice in London: Constructing mobile subjects and the politics of difference in policy-making," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    4. Linovski, Orly & Manaugh, Kevin & Baker, Dwayne Marshall, 2022. "The route not taken: Equity and transparency in unfunded transit proposals," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 77-84.
    5. Tornberg, Patrik & Odhage, John, 2018. "Making transport planning more collaborative? The case of Strategic Choice of Measures in Swedish transport planning," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 416-429.
    6. Aryana Soliz, 2021. "Creating Sustainable Cities through Cycling Infrastructure? Learning from Insurgent Mobilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-21, August.
    7. te Brömmelstroet, Marco & Skou Nicolaisen, Morten & Büttner, Benjamin & Ferreira, Antonio, 2017. "Experiences with transportation models: An international survey of planning practices," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 10-18.
    8. Sgibnev, Wladimir & Rekhviashvili, Lela, 2020. "Marschrutkas: Digitalisation, sustainability and mobility justice in a low-tech mobility sector," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 342-352.
    9. Vigar, Geoff, 2017. "The four knowledges of transport planning: Enacting a more communicative, trans-disciplinary policy and decision-making," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 39-45.
    10. Barber, Lachlan B., 2020. "Governing uneven mobilities: Walking and hierarchized circulation in Hong Kong," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    11. McLaren, Arlene Tigar, 2016. "Families and transportation: Moving towards multimodality and altermobility?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 218-225.
    12. Lovelace, Robin & Parkin, John & Cohen, Tom, 2020. "Open access transport models: A leverage point in sustainable transport planning," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 47-54.
    13. Budnitz, Hannah & Jaskólski, Marek & Knapskog, Marianne & Lis-Plesińska, Aleksandra & Schmidt, Filip & Szymanowski, Rafał & der Craats, Jasmijn van & Schwanen, Tim, 2025. "Multi-level governance and modal thinking: Tensions in electric mobility transitions in European cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 63-72.
    14. Pyrialakou, V. Dimitra & Gkritza, Konstantina & Fricker, Jon D., 2016. "Accessibility, mobility, and realized travel behavior: Assessing transport disadvantage from a policy perspective," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 252-269.
    15. Sykes, Pete & Bell, Margaret & Dissanayake, Dilum, 2018. "Combined use of a backcast scenario and cross-impact matrix analysis to identify causes of uncertainty in a nascent transport infrastructure project," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 124-140.
    16. Abebe, Henok Girma & Belin, Matts-Åke & Björnberg, Karin Edvardsson, 2024. "Equity and Social Justice considerations in road safety work: The case of Vision Zero in New York City," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 11-20.
    17. Soliz, Aryana & Carvalho, Thiago & Sarmiento-Casas, Claudio & Sánchez-Rodríguez, Jorge & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2023. "Scaling up active transportation across North America: A comparative content analysis of policies through a social equity framework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    18. Cunha, Isabel & Silva, Cecília, 2023. "Assessing the equity impact of cycling infrastructure allocation: Implications for planning practice," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 15-26.
    19. Fei Li & Christopher Kajetan Wyczalkowski, 2023. "How buses alleviate unemployment and poverty: Lessons from a natural experiment in Clayton County, GA," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(13), pages 2632-2650, October.
    20. te Brömmelstroet, Marco, 2017. "Towards a pragmatic research agenda for the PSS domain," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 77-83.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:61:y:2024:i:13:p:2585-2602. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.