IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v58y2021i15p3157-3175.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding policing demand and deployment through the lens of the city and with the application of big data

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Ellison

    (Manchester Metropolitan University, UK)

  • Jon Bannister

    (Manchester Metropolitan University, UK)

  • Won Do Lee

    (Oxford University, UK)

  • Muhammad Salman Haleem

    (University of Warwick, UK)

Abstract

The effective, efficient and equitable policing of urban areas rests on an appreciation of the qualities and scale of, as well as the factors shaping, demand. It also requires an appreciation of the factors shaping the resources deployed in their address. To this end, this article probes the extent to which policing demand (crime, anti-social behaviour, public safety and welfare) and deployment (front-line resource) are similarly conditioned by the social and physical urban environment, and by incident complexity. The prospect of exploring policing demand, deployment and their interplay is opened through the utilisation of big data and artificial intelligence and their integration with administrative and open data sources in a generalised method of moments (GMM) multilevel model. The research finds that policing demand and deployment hold varying and time-sensitive association with features of the urban environment. Moreover, we find that the complexities embedded in policing demands serve to shape both the cumulative and marginal resources expended in their address. Beyond their substantive policy relevance, these findings serve to open new avenues for urban criminological research centred on the consideration of the interplay between policing demand and deployment.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Ellison & Jon Bannister & Won Do Lee & Muhammad Salman Haleem, 2021. "Understanding policing demand and deployment through the lens of the city and with the application of big data," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(15), pages 3157-3175, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:58:y:2021:i:15:p:3157-3175
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098020981007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098020981007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098020981007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oecd, 2018. "What does innovation in pedagogy look like?," Teaching in Focus 21, OECD Publishing.
    2. Jee-Seon Kim & Edward Frees, 2007. "Multilevel Modeling with Correlated Effects," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 72(4), pages 505-533, December.
    3. Zoltán J. Ács & László Szerb & Esteban Lafuente & Ainsley Lloyd, 2018. "What Can We Do to Improve the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem?," SpringerBriefs in Economics, in: Global Entrepreneurship and Development Index 2018, chapter 0, pages 55-63, Springer.
    4. Oecd, 2018. "What does teaching look like?: A new video study," Teaching in Focus 20, OECD Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jon Bannister & Anthony O’Sullivan, 2021. "Big Data in the city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(15), pages 3061-3070, November.
    2. Fernando Fernandez-Monge & Sarah Barns & Rainer Kattel & Francesca Bria, 2024. "Reclaiming data for improved city governance: Barcelona’s New Data Deal," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(7), pages 1291-1307, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fernando Rojas & Peter Wanke & Víctor Leiva & Mauricio Huerta & Carlos Martin-Barreiro, 2022. "Modeling Inventory Cost Savings and Supply Chain Success Factors: A Hybrid Robust Compromise Multi-Criteria Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-18, August.
    2. Chau Minh Nguyen & Marcelo Vinhal Nepomuceno & Yany Grégoire & Renaud Legoux, 2024. "Striking the Right Notes: Long- and Short-Term Financial Impacts of Musicians’ Charity Advocacy Versus Other Signaling Types," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 217-233, August.
    3. Manzi, Jorge & San Martin, Ernesto & Van Bellegem, Sébastien, 2010. "School System Evaluation By Value-Added Analysis under Endogeneity," IDEI Working Papers 631, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
    4. Yann Kossi, 2024. "Productivity and selection effects in French economics departments," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 44(3), pages 918-931.
    5. Yang, Juan & SICULAR, Terry & LAI, Desheng, 2014. "The changing determinants of high school attainment in rural China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 551-566.
    6. Leonardo Grilli & Carla Rampichini, 2015. "Specification of random effects in multilevel models: a review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 967-976, May.
    7. Yi Xiang & David Soberman & Hubert Gatignon, 2022. "The Effect of Marketing Breadth and Competitive Spread on Category Growth," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(2), pages 622-644, February.
    8. Katherine E. Castellano & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh & Anders Skrondal, 2014. "Composition, Context, and Endogeneity in School and Teacher Comparisons," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 39(5), pages 333-367, October.
    9. Cristina Bernini & Alessandro Tampieri, 2023. "Much Ado about Salary: A Comparison of Monetary and Non-Monetary Components of Job Satisfaction," Working Papers - Economics wp2023_06.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    10. Pieroni, L. & d'Agostino, G., 2013. "Corruption and the effects of economic freedom," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 54-72.
    11. Jorge Manzi & Ernesto San Martín & Sébastien Van Bellegem, 2014. "School System Evaluation by Value Added Analysis Under Endogeneity," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 79(1), pages 130-153, January.
    12. Viviana Amati & Felix Schönenberger & Tom A. B. Snijders, 2019. "Contemporaneous Statistics for Estimation in Stochastic Actor-Oriented Co-evolution Models," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 84(4), pages 1068-1096, December.
    13. Chen, Chien-Ming & Chuang, Howard Hao-Chun, 2023. "Time to shift the shift: Performance effects of within-day cumulative service encounters in retail stores," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    14. Youmi Suk & Hyunseung Kang, 2022. "Robust Machine Learning for Treatment Effects in Multilevel Observational Studies Under Cluster-level Unmeasured Confounding," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 87(1), pages 310-343, March.
    15. Aleksey Oshchepkov & Anna Shirokanova, 2020. "Multilevel Modeling For Economists: Why, When And How," HSE Working papers WP BRP 233/EC/2020, National Research University Higher School of Economics.
    16. Michael David Bates & Katherine E. Castellano & Sophia Rabe-Hesketh & Anders Skrondal, 2014. "Handling Correlations Between Covariates and Random Slopes in Multilevel Models," Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, , vol. 39(6), pages 524-549, December.
    17. Acheampong, Albert & Elshandidy, Tamer, 2021. "Does soft information determine credit risk? Text-based evidence from European banks," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    18. Vasilis Sarafidis & Tom Wansbeek, 2020. "Celebrating 40 Years of Panel Data Analysis: Past, Present and Future," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 6/20, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    19. Nina Schumacher, 2022. "CAN BUSINESS MODEL COMPONENTS EXPLAIN DIGITAL START-UP SUCCESS? A Qualitative Analysis of the Business Models of Start-ups from the Perspective of German Venture Investors," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 31(1), pages 81-98, june.
    20. M. D. R. Evans & Jonathan Kelley & S. M. C. Kelley & C. G. E. Kelley, 2019. "Rising Income Inequality During the Great Recession Had No Impact on Subjective Wellbeing in Europe, 2003–2012," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 203-228, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:58:y:2021:i:15:p:3157-3175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.