IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v55y2018i5p1093-1110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Temporary use of space: Urban processes between flexibility, opportunity and precarity

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Madanipour

Abstract

The temporary use of privately-owned, empty space has been advocated by some as economically sensible and socially progressive, making use of unproductive and empty spaces by providing access to space for those who are otherwise unable to obtain it. The article critically examines this concept, arguing that the temporary use of space should be analysed as part of the urban development process with its temporal and spatial fluctuations and its multivalent outcomes. It investigates the production of empty space and the temporary use of space as a space of opportunity and a flexible method of production. By drawing on the case of Chesterfield House in London, in the context of the British response to the global financial crisis, the temporary use of space is shown to be a moment in a complex process, offering some opportunities, but also revealing the brevity of this moment and the precarity of its users. Beyond the realm of necessity, it may be transformed into a cultural choice, a lubricant of urban development and a medium of social change, signifying a space of opportunity for some and vulnerability for others.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Madanipour, 2018. "Temporary use of space: Urban processes between flexibility, opportunity and precarity," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(5), pages 1093-1110, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:5:p:1093-1110
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098017705546
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098017705546
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098017705546?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Louise Fabian & Kristine Samson, 2016. "Claiming participation -- a comparative analysis of DIY urbanism in Denmark," Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 166-184, June.
    2. Steele, Jess, 2013. "How ‘Meanwhile’ came to the High Street," Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 6(2), pages 172-175, January.
    3. Fran Tonkiss, 2013. "Austerity urbanism and the makeshift city," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 312-324, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joanna Williams, 2019. "The Circular Regeneration of a Seaport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-27, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aimee Felstead & Kevin Thwaites & James Simpson, 2019. "A Conceptual Framework for Urban Commoning in Shared Residential Landscapes in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-24, November.
    2. Hanna Hilbrandt, 2019. "Everyday urbanism and the everyday state: Negotiating habitat in allotment gardens in Berlin," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(2), pages 352-367, February.
    3. Alexander Nurse & Matthew Fulton, 2017. "Delivering strategic economic development in a time of urban austerity: European Union structural funds and the English city regions," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 32(3), pages 164-182, May.
    4. Robert Shaw, 2014. "Streetlighting in England and Wales: New Technologies and Uncertainty in the Assemblage of Streetlighting Infrastructure," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(9), pages 2228-2242, September.
    5. Jakub Galuszka, 2024. "BOATS AS HOUSING IN OXFORD, UK: Trajectories of Informality in a High‐Income Context," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 126-144, January.
    6. Jan Lilliendahl Larsen & Martin Severin Frandsen, 2022. "Urban Drama: Power Mediation in Antagonistic Copenhagen," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 7(3), pages 326-339.
    7. Grimaldi, Didier & Fernandez, Vicenc & Carrasco, Carlos, 2019. "Heuristic for the localization of new shops based on business and social criteria," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 249-257.
    8. Mel Nowicki, 2021. "Is anyone home? Appropriating and re-narrativisating the post-criminalisation squatting scene in England and Wales," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(4), pages 838-855, June.
    9. Herlin Chien & Keiko Hori & Osamu Saito, 2022. "Urban commons in the techno-economic paradigm shift: An information and communication technology-enabled climate-resilient solutions review," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(5), pages 1389-1405, June.
    10. Andrea Pollio, 2019. "Forefronts of the Sharing Economy: Uber in Cape Town," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(4), pages 760-775, July.
    11. Janet Merkel, 2019. "‘Freelance isn’t free.’ Co-working as a critical urban practice to cope with informality in creative labour markets," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(3), pages 526-547, February.
    12. Amirzadeh, Melika & Sharifi, Ayyoob, 2024. "The evolutionary path of place making: From late twentieth century to post-pandemic cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    13. Clara Medina-García & Rosa de la Fuente & Pieter Van den Broeck, 2021. "Exploring the Emergence of Innovative Multi-Actor Collaborations toward a Progressive Urban Regime in Madrid (2015–2019)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, January.
    14. Ross Beveridge & Philippe Koch, 2021. "Contesting austerity, de-centring the state: Anti-politics and the political horizon of the urban," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(3), pages 451-468, May.
    15. Viviana Asara, 2018. "Untangling the radical imaginaries of the Indignados' movement: Commons, autonomy and ecologism," SRE-Disc sre-disc-2018_04, Institute for Multilevel Governance and Development, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    16. Slade, Jason & Inch, Andy & Crookes, Lee, 2021. "Building infrastructures for inclusive regeneration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    17. Michael Janoschka & Fabiola Mota, 2021. "New municipalism in action or urban neoliberalisation reloaded? An analysis of governance change, stability and path dependence in Madrid (2015–2019)," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(13), pages 2814-2830, October.
    18. Aleksandra Nowysz & Łukasz Mazur & Magdalena Daria Vaverková & Eugeniusz Koda & Jan Winkler, 2022. "Urban Agriculture as an Alternative Source of Food and Water Security in Today’s Sustainable Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-21, November.
    19. Iulian Barba Lata & Martijn Duineveld, 2019. "A harbour on land: De Ceuvel’s topologies of creative reuse," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(8), pages 1758-1774, November.
    20. Sophia Maalsen, 2022. "The hack: What it is and why it matters to urban studies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(2), pages 453-465, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:55:y:2018:i:5:p:1093-1110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.