IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v52y2015i3p486-500.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safe nightlife collaborations: Multiple actors, conflicting interests and different power distributions

Author

Listed:
  • Ilse van Liempt

Abstract

Given the expectation that people will consume more when safety is guaranteed, most cities have, along with the stimulation of nightlife districts, implemented special policies to promote safety. Safe nightlife policies fit in neatly in the larger context of ‘integral’ safety policies where many different actors are expected to collaborate and take responsibility. Very little is known, however, about the interactions between various actors within these new partnerships. This research acknowledges an emerging surveillant ‘assemblage’ in urban nightlife districts where different systems are brought together and practices and technologies are combined and integrated into a larger whole. Interviews with different actors involved in safe nightlife collaborations in Utrecht and Rotterdam (The Netherlands), show how differences in the emergence and set-up of these assemblages, conflicting interests and different power distributions between actors shape collaborations on the ground considerably and result in various local outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilse van Liempt, 2015. "Safe nightlife collaborations: Multiple actors, conflicting interests and different power distributions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(3), pages 486-500, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:52:y:2015:i:3:p:486-500
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098013504010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098013504010
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098013504010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tim Schwanen & Irina van Aalst & Jelle Brands & Tjerk Timan, 2012. "Rhythms of the Night: Spatiotemporal Inequalities in the Nighttime Economy," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 44(9), pages 2064-2085, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kapitza, Jonas, 2022. "How people get to work at night. A discrete choice model approach towards the influence of nighttime on the choice of transport mode for commuting to work," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    2. Meadows, Robert & Nettleton, Sarah & Neale, Joanne, 2017. "Sleep waves and recovery from drug and alcohol dependence: Towards a rhythm analysis of sleep in residential treatment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 124-133.
    3. Anqi Zhang & Weifeng Li & Jiayu Wu & Jian Lin & Jianqun Chu & Chang Xia, 2021. "How can the urban landscape affect urban vitality at the street block level? A case study of 15 metropolises in China," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(5), pages 1245-1262, June.
    4. Jelle Brands & Tim Schwanen & Irina van Aalst, 2015. "Fear of crime and affective ambiguities in the night-time economy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(3), pages 439-455, February.
    5. Marie Gibert-Flutre, 2022. "Rhythmanalysis: Rethinking the politics of everyday negotiations in ordinary public spaces," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 40(1), pages 279-297, February.
    6. Alex Farrington, 2021. "Reorienting The Production of Space: Rhythmanalysis, desire, and “The Siege of the Third Precinctâ€," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 39(5), pages 938-954, August.
    7. Plyushteva, Anna & Boussauw, Kobe, 2020. "Does night-time public transport contribute to inclusive night mobility? Exploring Sofia's night bus network from a gender perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 41-50.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:52:y:2015:i:3:p:486-500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.