IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v52y2015i2p338-357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The ‘constant size neighbourhood trap’ in accessibility and health studies

Author

Listed:
  • Julie Vallée

    (CNRS, UMR Géographie-Cités, France; Université de Montréal, CRCHUM-IRSPUM, Canada)

  • Guillaume Le Roux

    (Université de Poitiers, UMR Migrinter, France)

  • Basile Chaix

    (INSERM, IPLESP-ERES, France)

  • Yan Kestens

    (Université de Montréal, CRCHUM, Canada)

  • Pierre Chauvin

    (INSERM, IPLESP-ERES, France)

Abstract

In literature on neighbourhood effects and resources accessibility, the number of neighbourhood resources to which residents may have access are often estimated from spatial units whose constant size fails to account for unique ways residents experience their neighbourhoods. To investigate this ‘constant size neighbourhood trap’, we compared numbers of healthcare resources included in Constant Size Buffers (CSBs) and in Perceived Neighbourhood Polygons (PNPs) from cognitive neighbourhood data collected among 653 residents of the Paris metropolitan area. We observed that residents of deprived and peripheral areas had smaller PNPs than their counterparts. Studying residents assessments of the quantity of neighbourhood practitioners, we then assessed the validity of using PNPs rather than CSBs to estimate number of neighbourhood resources. Lastly, resource inequalities across the Paris metropolitan area were found to be far wider when considering PNPs rather than CSBs. Using constant neighbourhood delineation can lead to inaccurately measured individual accessibility to neighbourhood resources and to downplay the extent of inequalities in urban resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Julie Vallée & Guillaume Le Roux & Basile Chaix & Yan Kestens & Pierre Chauvin, 2015. "The ‘constant size neighbourhood trap’ in accessibility and health studies," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(2), pages 338-357, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:52:y:2015:i:2:p:338-357
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098014528393
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098014528393
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098014528393?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Macintyre, Sally & Macdonald, Laura & Ellaway, Anne, 2008. "Do poorer people have poorer access to local resources and facilities? The distribution of local resources by area deprivation in Glasgow, Scotland," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 900-914, September.
    2. Rainham, Daniel & McDowell, Ian & Krewski, Daniel & Sawada, Mike, 2010. "Conceptualizing the healthscape: Contributions of time geography, location technologies and spatial ecology to place and health research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(5), pages 668-676, March.
    3. Inagami, Sanae & Cohen, Deborah A. & Finch, Brian K., 2007. "Non-residential neighborhood exposures suppress neighborhood effects on self-rated health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(8), pages 1779-1791, October.
    4. Kwan, Mei-Po, 2009. "From place-based to people-based exposure measures," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 1311-1313, November.
    5. Ruth Lupton, 2003. "'Neighbourhood Effects': Can we measure them and does it matter?," CASE Papers 073, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    6. Ruth Lupton, 2003. "Neighbourhood Effects: Can we measure them and does it matter?," CASE Papers case73, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    7. Spielman, Seth E. & Yoo, Eun-hye, 2009. "The spatial dimensions of neighborhood effects," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1098-1105, March.
    8. Flowerdew, Robin & Manley, David J. & Sabel, Clive E., 2008. "Neighbourhood effects on health: Does it matter where you draw the boundaries?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(6), pages 1241-1255, March.
    9. Vallée, Julie & Cadot, Emmanuelle & Roustit, Christelle & Parizot, Isabelle & Chauvin, Pierre, 2011. "The role of daily mobility in mental health inequalities: The interactive influence of activity space and neighbourhood of residence on depression," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(8), pages 1133-1144.
    10. Lupton, Ruth, 2003. "'Neighbourhood effects': can we measure them and does it matter?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 6327, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yongxin Deng, 2016. "Challenges and complications in neighborhood mapping: from neighborhood concept to operationalization," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 229-248, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eleonore M Veldhuizen & Karien Stronks & Anton E Kunst, 2013. "Assessing Associations between Socio-Economic Environment and Self-Reported Health in Amsterdam Using Bespoke Environments," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(7), pages 1-10, July.
    2. Shareck, Martine & Kestens, Yan & Frohlich, Katherine L., 2014. "Moving beyond the residential neighborhood to explore social inequalities in exposure to area-level disadvantage: Results from the Interdisciplinary Study on Inequalities in Smoking," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 106-114.
    3. Petteway, Ryan J. & Mujahid, Mahasin & Allen, Amani & Morello-Frosch, Rachel, 2019. "The body language of place: A new method for mapping intergenerational “geographies of embodiment” in place-health research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 223(C), pages 51-63.
    4. Martin Gächter & Engelbert Theurl, 2010. "Convergence of the Health Status at the Local Level: Empirical Evidence from Austria," NRN working papers 2010-09, The Austrian Center for Labor Economics and the Analysis of the Welfare State, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    5. Caitlin Robinson & Stefan Bouzarovski & Sarah Lindley, 2018. "Underrepresenting neighbourhood vulnerabilities? The measurement of fuel poverty in England," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 50(5), pages 1109-1127, August.
    6. Shearer, Cindy & Rainham, Daniel & Blanchard, Chris & Dummer, Trevor & Lyons, Renee & Kirk, Sara, 2015. "Measuring food availability and accessibility among adolescents: Moving beyond the neighbourhood boundary," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 322-330.
    7. Anthony Buttaro & Ludovica Gambaro & Heather Joshi & Mary Clare Lennon, 2021. "Neighborhood and Child Development at Age Five: A UK–US Comparison," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-16, October.
    8. Erin York Cornwell & Kathleen A Cagney, 2017. "Aging in Activity Space: Results From Smartphone-Based GPS-Tracking of Urban Seniors," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 72(5), pages 864-875.
    9. Rebecca Tunstall & Anne Green & Ruth Lupton & Simon Watmough & Katie Bates, 2014. "Does Poor Neighbourhood Reputation Create a Neighbourhood Effect on Employment? The Results of a Field Experiment in the UK," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 51(4), pages 763-780, March.
    10. Lars Brannstrom, 2004. "Poor Places, Poor Prospects? Counterfactual Models of Neighbourhood Effects on Social Exclusion in Stockholm, Sweden," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(13), pages 2515-2537, December.
    11. Thomas Maloutas & Yannis Frangopoulos & Alexandra Makridou & Eirini Kostaki & Dimitris Kourkouridis & Stavros Nikiforos Spyrellis, 2024. "Exploring Spatial Proximity and Social Exclusion through Two Case Studies of Roma Settlements in Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, February.
    12. Jamie O'Brien & Miguel Serra & Andrew Hudson-Smith & Sophia Psarra & Anthony Hunter & Martin Zaltz-Austwick, 2016. "Ensuring VGI Credibility in Urban-Community Data Generation: A Methodological Research Design," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 88-100.
    13. Petrović, Ana & Manley, David & van Ham, Maarten, 2018. "Freedom from the Tyranny of Neighbourhood: Rethinking Socio-Spatial Context Effects," IZA Discussion Papers 11416, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Anne Power & Nicola Serle & Helen Willmot, 2011. "Obstacles and Opportunities: Today’s children, tomorrow’s families," CASE Reports casereport66, Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE.
    15. Christian A.B. Nygaard, 2016. "Geology and the Emergence of Modern Neighbourhoods and Social Structures," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2016-08, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
    16. Tim Cassiers & Christian Kesteloot, 2012. "Socio-spatial Inequalities and Social Cohesion in European Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(9), pages 1909-1924, July.
    17. Marinus C. Deurloo & Sjoerd De Vos, 2008. "Measuring Segregation At The Micro Level: An Application Of The M Measure To Multi‐Ethnic Residential Neighbourhoods In Amsterdam," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 99(3), pages 329-347, July.
    18. Ive Marx & Brian Nolan & Javier Olivera, 2014. "The Welfare State and Anti-Poverty Policy in Rich Countries," Working Papers 1403, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    19. Joanne Bretherton & Nicholas Pleace, 2011. "A Difficult Mix," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(16), pages 3433-3447, December.
    20. Power, Anne & Serle, Nicola & Willmot, Helen, 2011. "Obstacles and opportunities: today’s children, tomorrow’s families," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 43806, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:52:y:2015:i:2:p:338-357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.