IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v50y2013i6p1260-1276.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community Governance and Pastorship in Shanghai: A Case Study of Luwan District

Author

Listed:
  • Wen-I Lin
  • Chaolee Kuo

Abstract

The current literature on Chinese urban studies and governmentality undertheorises the reform of local governance with regard to the activation and empowerment of community in China. Inspired by Dean’s and Sigley’s discussions of non-liberal or ‘Chinese governmentality’, this paper seeks to understand and conceptualise one of China’s most noted examples of community development, the so-called Shanghai model, using the Foucauldian concept of pastorship. Understood here as distinct from the notion of ‘advanced liberal’ governmentality, it is argued that Shanghai’s community governance depends on the governing concepts and technologies associated with the socio-political construction of the ‘pastoral’ relationship between local Party leaders and citizens. By focusing on the case study of Luwan district and one of its grass-roots community organisations (Wuliqiao Street Office), this paper will demonstrate the characteristics, institutionalisation and limitations of, pastoral governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen-I Lin & Chaolee Kuo, 2013. "Community Governance and Pastorship in Shanghai: A Case Study of Luwan District," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(6), pages 1260-1276, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:50:y:2013:i:6:p:1260-1276
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098012465903
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098012465903
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098012465903?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colin Mcfarlane, 2010. "The Comparative City: Knowledge, Learning, Urbanism," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 725-742, December.
    2. Leslie Shieh & John Friedmann, 2008. "Restructuring urban governance," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 183-195, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu, Ang & Tang, Chengzuo, 2018. "Mobilized to Take a Vanguard Role: Communist Party Members’ Participation in the Community Building Campaign," SocArXiv 6khja, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vanesa Castán Broto & Harriet Bulkeley, 2013. "Maintaining Climate Change Experiments: Urban Political Ecology and the Everyday Reconfiguration of Urban Infrastructure," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 1934-1948, November.
    2. Partha Mukhopadhyay & Marie‐Hélène Zérah & Eric Denis, 2020. "Subaltern Urbanization: Indian Insights for Urban Theory," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 582-598, July.
    3. Shenjing He & George CS Lin, 2015. "Producing and consuming China’s new urban space: State, market and society," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(15), pages 2757-2773, November.
    4. Yong-Sook Lee & Eun-Jung Hwang, 2012. "Global Urban Frontiers through Policy Transfer? Unpacking Seoul’s Creative City Programmes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(13), pages 2817-2837, October.
    5. Zheng Wang & Fangzhu Zhang & Fulong Wu, 2020. "The contribution of intergroup neighbouring to community participation: Evidence from Shanghai," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(6), pages 1224-1242, May.
    6. Alistair Sheldrick & James Evans & Gabriele Schliwa, 2017. "Policy learning and sustainable urban transitions: Mobilising Berlin’s cycling renaissance," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(12), pages 2739-2762, September.
    7. Kristof van Assche & Raoul Beunen & Stefan Verweij, 2020. "Comparative Planning Research, Learning, and Governance: The Benefits and Limitations of Learning Policy by Comparison," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(1), pages 11-21.
    8. Julie-Anne Boudreau & Liette Gilbert & Danielle Labbé, 2016. "Uneven state formalization and periurban housing production in Hanoi and Mexico City: Comparative reflections from the global South," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 48(12), pages 2383-2401, December.
    9. Ryan Burns & Victoria Fast & Anthony Levenda & Byron Miller, 2021. "Smart cities: Between worlding and provincialising," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(3), pages 461-470, February.
    10. Nikhil Anand & Bethany Wiggin & Lalitha Kamath & Pranjal Deekshit, 2022. "ENDURING HARM: Unlikely Comparisons, Slow Violence and the Administration of Urban Injustice," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 651-659, July.
    11. Tom Goodfellow, 2018. "Seeing Political Settlements through the City: A Framework for Comparative Analysis of Urban Transformation," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 49(1), pages 199-222, January.
    12. Christopher Yap, 2019. "Self-Organisation in Urban Community Gardens: Autogestion, Motivations, and the Role of Communication," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, May.
    13. Zheng Wang, 2022. "LIFE AFTER RESETTLEMENT IN URBAN CHINA: State‐led Community Building as a Reterritorialization Strategy," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(3), pages 424-440, May.
    14. Richard Friend & Pakamas Thinphanga, 2018. "Urban Water Crises under Future Uncertainties: The Case of Institutional and Infrastructure Complexity in Khon Kaen, Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Andrew Harris & Susan Moore, 2013. "Planning Histories and Practices of Circulating Urban Knowledge," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(5), pages 1499-1509, September.
    16. Elena Oleinik & Alyona Zakharova, 2019. "City: economic growth and social attractiveness issues," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(1), pages 454-470, September.
    17. Nancy Odendaal, 2021. "Everyday urbanisms and the importance of place: Exploring the elements of the emancipatory smart city," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(3), pages 639-654, February.
    18. Christian Schmid & Ozan Karaman & Naomi C Hanakata & Pascal Kallenberger & Anne Kockelkorn & Lindsay Sawyer & Monika Streule & Kit Ping Wong, 2018. "Towards a new vocabulary of urbanisation processes: A comparative approach," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(1), pages 19-52, January.
    19. Oded Haas, 2022. "De-colonising the right to housing, one new city at a time: Seeing housing development from Palestine/Israel," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(8), pages 1676-1693, June.
    20. Tuitjer, Leonie, 2019. "Forschen im Globalen Süden: Forschungsethik als transformative Kraft?," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Abassiharofteh, Milad & Baier, Jessica & Göb, Angelina & Thimm, Insa & Eberth, Andreas & Knaps, Falc (ed.), Räumliche Transformation: Prozesse, Konzepte, Forschungsdesigns, volume 10, pages 117-129, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:50:y:2013:i:6:p:1260-1276. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.