IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v37y2000i8p1379-1402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

New Labour, New Planning? The Trajectory of Planning in Blair's Britain

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Allmendinger

    (European Urban and Regional Research Centre, Department of Land Economy, University of Aberdeen, St Mary's, King's College, Old Aberdeen, AB243UF, UK, p.allmendinger@abdn.ac.uk)

  • Mark Tewdwr-Jones

    (European Urban and Regional Research Centre, Department of Land Economy, University of Aberdeen, St Mary's, King's College, Old Aberdeen, AB243UF, UK, m.tewdwrjones@abdn.ac.uk)

Abstract

The election of the 'New Labour' government in the UK in May 1997 heralded the start of a new opportunity and era for politics. A determination to modernise the institutions of Britain, associated with a commitment to foster social justice and community with concern for the market, has created a new ethos within government. Led by a Prime Minister viewed as embodying vision and change, the government has started to amend 18 years of Conservative policies structurally, constitutionally and sector ally. The British planning system has changed very little in format and style since its statutory inception in the 1940s, and one would think that this institutional process is an obvious candidate for modernisation. But New Labour possessed very few ideas to amend planning while in opposition, and the proposals announced over the past 24 months that impact on planning suggest continuation rather than radical overhaul. This paper charts the legacy for New Labour in the fields of planning and environmental policy left by the outgoing New Right Major government, and additionally attempts to identify the political ideological ethos and history of policy development behind possible changes to planning. It outlines the major policy amendments announced to date and offers a perspective on the trajectory of planning under a New Labour administration in the years ahead.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Allmendinger & Mark Tewdwr-Jones, 2000. "New Labour, New Planning? The Trajectory of Planning in Blair's Britain," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(8), pages 1379-1402, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:37:y:2000:i:8:p:1379-1402
    DOI: 10.1080/00420980020080171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980020080171
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420980020080171?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. N A Phelps & M Tewdwr-Jones, 1998. "Institutional Capacity Building in a Strategic Policy Vacuum: The Case of the Korean Company LG in South Wales," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 16(6), pages 735-755, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Brooksbank & David Pickernell, 2001. "Changing the Name of the Game? RSA, Indigenous and Inward Investors and the National Assembly for Wales," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 271-277.
    2. Paul Benneworth & Tiago Ratinho, 2014. "Reframing the Role of Knowledge Parks and Science Cities in Knowledge-Based Urban Development," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 32(5), pages 784-808, October.
    3. Aidan While & Andrew E G Jonas & David C Gibbs, 2004. "Unblocking the City? Growth Pressures, Collective Provision, and the Search for New Spaces of Governance in Greater Cambridge, England," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(2), pages 279-304, February.
    4. Joseph Leibovitz, 2003. "Institutional Barriers to Associative City-region Governance: The Politics of Institution-building and Economic Governance in 'Canada's Technology Triangle'," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(13), pages 2613-2642, December.
    5. Mark Tewdwr-Jones & Nicholas Phelps, 2000. "Levelling the Uneven Playing Field: Inward Investment, Interregional Rivalry and the Planning System," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(5), pages 429-440.
    6. Nicholas A Phelps & Mark Tewdwr-Jones, 2000. "Scratching the Surface of Collaborative and Associative Governance: Identifying the Diversity of Social Action in Institutional Capacity Building," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(1), pages 111-130, January.
    7. Crispian Fuller & Robert J Bennett & Mark Ramsden, 2003. "Organised for Inward Investment? Development Agencies, Local Government, and Firms in the Inward Investment Process," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 35(11), pages 2025-2051, November.
    8. Crispian Fuller & Robert J Bennett & Mark Ramsden, 2004. "Local Government and the Changing Institutional Landscape of Economic Development in England and Wales," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 22(3), pages 317-347, June.
    9. N A Phelps & M Tewdwr-Jones, 1999. "Competing through Planning," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 26(2), pages 159-162, April.
    10. Nicholas A. Phelps & Mark Tewdwr-Jones, 2001. "Globalisation, Regions and the State: Exploring the Limitations of Economic Modernisation through Inward Investment," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(8), pages 1253-1272, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:37:y:2000:i:8:p:1379-1402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.