IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v35y1998i9p1457-1480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining Size Differentiation of Business Service Centres

Author

Listed:
  • Robert J. Bennett

    (Department of Geography, University of Cambridge, Downing Place, Cambridge CB2 3EN, England, UK, rjb7@cus.cam.ac.uk)

  • Daniel J. Graham

    (Department of Computing, Imperial College London, 180 Queensgate, London SW7 2BZ, England, UK, d.j.graham@ic.ac.uk)

Abstract

This paper assesses the differentiation between business centres in Britain using data on business location from the Census of Employment analysed at postcode district level. The paper uses a combination of micro-analytical, central place theory and interregional trade theory to argue that centres can be expected to be differentiated from each other in the form of a hierarchy. The paper uses a spatial interaction model to test various possible forms of hierarchy. A five-level hierarchy is demonstrated for national/international, regional, sub-regional and local centres, as well as sub-regional centres that are 'shadowed' by nearby regional centres. Whilst the paper is exploratory, so that we would not argue that any one centre is rigidly at any single position in the hierarchy, the paper strongly demonstrates the continued importance of urban hierarchy in business location.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert J. Bennett & Daniel J. Graham, 1998. "Explaining Size Differentiation of Business Service Centres," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 35(9), pages 1457-1480, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:35:y:1998:i:9:p:1457-1480
    DOI: 10.1080/0042098984231
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098984231
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0042098984231?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William B. Beyers & David P. Lindahl, 1996. "Explaining The Demand For Producer Services: Is Cost‐Driven Externalization The Major Factor?," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(3), pages 351-374, July.
    2. Barry Lentnek & Alan MacPherson & David Phillips, 1995. "A Market Coverage Model For Producer Services," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(4), pages 389-399, October.
    3. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    4. William J. Coffey & Réjean Drolet & Mario Polèse, 1996. "The Intrametropolitan Location Of High Order Services: Patterns, Factors And Mobility In Montreal," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(3), pages 293-323, July.
    5. Krugman, Paul, 1993. "On the number and location of cities," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(2-3), pages 293-298, April.
    6. Krugman, Paul & Venables, Anthony J., 1996. "Integration, specialization, and adjustment," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(3-5), pages 959-967, April.
    7. Adrian Esparza & Andrew J. Krmenec, 1996. "The Spatial Extent of Producer Service Markets: Hierarchical Models of Interaction Revisited," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(3), pages 375-395, July.
    8. T J Fik & G F Mulligan, 1990. "Spatial Flows and Competing Central Places: Towards a General Theory of Hierarchical Interaction," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 22(4), pages 527-549, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Robert Bennett & William Bratton & Paul Robson, 2000. "Business Advice: The Influence of Distance," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(9), pages 813-828.
    2. Adrian X. Esparza & Andrew J. Krmenec, 2000. "Large City Interaction in the US Urban System," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(4), pages 691-709, April.
    3. Makoto Okumura & Makoto Tsukai, 2014. "Business service location with spatially stochastic demands: agglomeration economies generated by interaction costs and localized uncertain demand – an optimal stock location model approach," Chapters, in: Charlie Karlsson & Börje Johansson & Kiyoshi Kobayashi & Roger R. Stough (ed.), Knowledge, Innovation and Space, chapter 7, pages 160-179, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. James M. Lutz, 2001. "Determinants of Population Growth in Urban Centres in the Republic of Ireland," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(8), pages 1329-1340, July.
    5. Tom Hashimoto & Vladimír Pažitka & Dariusz Wójcik, 2022. "The spatial reach of financial centres: An empirical investigation of interurban trade in capital market services," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 59(6), pages 1255-1274, May.
    6. John B. Parr & Leslie Budd, 2000. "Financial Services and the Urban System: An Exploration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(3), pages 593-610, March.
    7. Robert J. Bennett & Paul J. A. Robson & William J. A. Bratton, 2001. "The Influence of Location on the Use by SMEs of External Advice and Collaboration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(9), pages 1531-1557, August.
    8. Anderson Cavalcante & Renan P. Almeida & Nathaniel Baker, 2016. "The urban dynamics of financial services: centralities in the metropolis [A dinâmica urbana dos serviços financeiros: centralidades na metrópole]," Nova Economia, Economics Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (Brazil), vol. 26(spe), pages 1245-1285, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lenaerts, Bert & Allroggen, Florian & Malina, Robert, 2021. "The economic impact of aviation: A review on the role of market access," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    2. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Tselios, Vassilis, 2007. "Analysis of Educational Distribution in Europe: Educational Attainment and Inequality Within Regions," Papers DYNREG08, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    3. Paul Cheshire, 1999. "Cities in Competition: Articulating the Gains from Integration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(5-6), pages 843-864, May.
    4. C. Michael Wernerheim & Christopher A. Sharpe, 2001. "The Potential Bias in Producer Service Employment Estimates: The Case of the Canadian Space Economy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(3), pages 563-591, March.
    5. Ademir Rocha & Fernando Perobelli, 2020. "Spatial distribution of logistics services in Brazil: A potential market analysis," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(1), pages 185-217, February.
    6. Boiscuvier, Éléonore, 2001. "Innovation, intégration et développement régional," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 77(2), pages 255-280, juin.
    7. Gilles Duranton, 1997. "La nouvelle économie géographique : agglomération et dispersion," Économie et Prévision, Programme National Persée, vol. 131(5), pages 1-24.
    8. Sandy Dall’erba, 2005. "Distribution of regional income and regional funds in Europe 1989–1999: An exploratory spatial data analysis," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 39(1), pages 121-148, March.
    9. Lapo, Valentina, 2010. "Spatial concentration of production and investor expectations: the analysis of branch attraction of investments into regions," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 18(2), pages 3-19.
    10. Paul Krugman, 1999. "The Role of Geography in Development," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 22(2), pages 142-161, August.
    11. Kim, Ho Yeon, 2012. "Shrinking population and the urban hierarchy," IDE Discussion Papers 360, Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization(JETRO).
    12. Pontus Braunerhjelm & Per Thulin, 2009. "Agglomeration, Relative Wage Costs and Foreign Direct Investment—Evidence from Swedish MNCs 1974–1998," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 197-217, September.
    13. Takanori Ago & Ikumo Isono & Takatoshi Tabuchi, 2003. "Locational Disadvantage and Losses from Trade: Three Regions in Economic Geography," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-224, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    14. Boucekkine, Raouf & Camacho, Carmen & Zou, Benteng, 2009. "Bridging The Gap Between Growth Theory And The New Economic Geography: The Spatial Ramsey Model," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 20-45, February.
    15. F Medda & P Nijkamp & P Rietveld, 1999. "Urban Industrial Relocation: The Theory of Edge Cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 26(5), pages 751-761, October.
    16. Epifani, Paolo, 2005. "Heckscher-Ohlin and agglomeration," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 645-657, November.
    17. Marcus Berliant & Yves Zenou, 2014. "Labor Differentiation and Agglomeration in General Equilibrium," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 37(1), pages 36-65, January.
    18. Berliant, Marcus & ten Raa, Thijs, 2003. "Increasing returns and perfect competition: the role of land," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2), pages 339-367, September.
    19. Fabrice Darrigues & Jean-Marc Montaud, 2001. "Intégration économique et agglomération des activités industrielles dans le Mercosur, les enseignements d'un modèle d'économie géographique," Documents de travail 54, Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.
    20. Brakman, Steven & Garretsen, Harry & Schramm, Marc, 2001. "New economic geography in Germany: testing the Helpman-Hanson model," Research Report 01D46, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:35:y:1998:i:9:p:1457-1480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.