IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v34y1997i4p627-646.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effectiveness of Public Intervention in the Property Market

Author

Listed:
  • Jieming Zhu

    (School of Building and Estate Management, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260, bemzhujm@nus.sg)

Abstract

By examining the property market and its contextual socio-economic development in 1980s Singapore, this paper tackles the issue of effectiveness of government intervention in an inefficient property market within the framework of a free market economy. Induced by seemingly perpetual economic growth and by the drive for structural upgrading of the economy, development of property across all sectors responded by an upsurge in volume at the beginning of the 1980s. However, oversupply of property loomed consequently as supply overtook demand. Vacant floor areas were accumulated until the market hit the sudden unexpected recession of 1986 when property values were dampened down in the doldrums. The government decided to intervene with comprehensive measures, intending to prevent the market from further deterioration. Based on a conceptual framework, the effectiveness of the intervention in the property market is evaluated. It is found that the Central Provident Fund and property tax rebate are helpful to some extent in encouraging demand for investment and occupation. Nevertheless, market fundamentals should be taken into consideration in interpreting why the private housing market is more responsive than non-residential property markets to the interventions. Government interventionist instruments only serve as catalysts which work together with other right ingredients. On the whole, the total recovery of the property market is due to the reviving of the economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Jieming Zhu, 1997. "The Effectiveness of Public Intervention in the Property Market," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(4), pages 627-646, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:34:y:1997:i:4:p:627-646
    DOI: 10.1080/0042098975952
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098975952
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0042098975952?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P Healey, 1994. "Urban Policy and Property Development: The Institutional Relations of Real-Estate Development in an Old Industrial Region," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 26(2), pages 177-198, February.
    2. Graham Hallett, 1979. "Urban Land Economics," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-1-349-04537-2, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tsu Lung Chou & Yu Chun Lin, 2007. "Industrial Park Development across the Taiwan Strait," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(8), pages 1405-1425, July.
    2. Simon Guy & John Henneberry, 2000. "Understanding Urban Development Processes: Integrating the Economic and the Social in Property Research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(13), pages 2399-2416, December.
    3. Peter Wissoker & Desiree Fields & Rachel Weber & Elvin Wyly, 2014. "Rethinking Real Estate Finance in the Wake of a Boom: A Celebration of the Twentieth Anniversary of the Publication of the Double Issue on Property and Finance in Environment and Planning A," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(12), pages 2787-2794, December.
    4. É D'Arcy & G Keogh, 1997. "Towards a Property Market Paradigm of Urban Change," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 29(4), pages 685-706, April.
    5. Qingshu Xie & A.R. Ghanbari Parsa & Barry Redding, 2002. "The Emergence of the Urban Land Market in China: Evolution, Structure, Constraints and Perspectives," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(8), pages 1375-1398, July.
    6. Siân Butcher, 2020. "Appropriating rent from greenfield affordable housing: developer practices in Johannesburg," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(2), pages 337-361, March.
    7. Sun Sheng Han & Yong Wang, 2003. "The Institutional Structure of a Property Market in Inland China: Chongqing," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(1), pages 91-112, January.
    8. Ramin Keivani & Ali Parsa & Stanley McGreal, 2001. "Globalisation, Institutional Structures and Real Estate Markets in Central European Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(13), pages 2457-2476, December.
    9. Anelli, Debora & Tajani, Francesco, 2023. "Spatial decision support systems for effective ex-ante risk evaluation: An innovative model for improving the real estate redevelopment processes," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    10. J Zhu, 1999. "The Formation of a Market-Oriented Local Property Development Industry in Transitional China: A Shenzhen Case Study," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 31(10), pages 1839-1856, October.
    11. A R Ghanbari-Parsa & R Moatazed-Keivani, 1999. "Development of Real Estate Markets in Central Europe: The Case of Prague, Warsaw, and Budapest," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 31(8), pages 1383-1399, August.
    12. Joe Doak & Nikos Karadimitriou, 2007. "(Re)development, Complexity and Networks: A Framework for Research," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 44(2), pages 209-229, February.
    13. Eamonn D'Arcy & Geoffrey Keogh, 1999. "The Property Market and Urban Competitiveness: A Review," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(5-6), pages 917-928, May.
    14. Richard Prentice, 1984. "Comparability and Incomparability in Housing Programmes in Wales; A Spatial Analysis for 1981," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 21(4), pages 427-438, November.
    15. Richard Ballard & Siân Butcher, 2020. "Comparing the relational work of developers," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 52(2), pages 266-276, March.
    16. Andreas Cebulla, 1995. "Property-Led Regeneration and Job Creation: The Belfast Case," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 10(1), pages 21-32, May.
    17. John Henneberry, 1995. "Developers, property cycles and local economic development: The case of Sheffield," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 10(2), pages 163-185, August.
    18. Antoine Guironnet & Katia Attuyer & Ludovic Halbert, 2016. "Building cities on financial assets: The financialisation of property markets and its implications for city governments in the Paris city-region," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(7), pages 1442-1464, May.
    19. John Henneberry, 1999. "Convergence and Difference in Regional Office Development Cycles," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(9), pages 1439-1465, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:34:y:1997:i:4:p:627-646. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.