IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v33y1996i6p991-1019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Going for Growth: Prestige Projects in Three British Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Loftman

    (Built Environment Development Centre, University of Central England in Birmingham, Perry Barr, Birmingham, B42 2SU, UK)

  • Brendan Nevin

    (Built Environment Development Centre, University of Central England in Birmingham, Perry Barr, Birmingham, B42 2SU, UK)

Abstract

In response to the global restructuring of industry in the 1970s and 1980s, the elected governments of economically depressed cities have increasingly adopted growth-orientated local economic development policies. A key component of pro-growth local economic development strategies, adopted by UK city governments and central government agencies has been investment in, and promotion of, high-profile prestige property developments and civic boosterism activities. This paper provides a review of the local economic development responses of three UK local authorities (Birmingham, Sheffield and Manchester) to economic restructuring and the intensification of inter-city competition. Through an examination of the three case studies, the paper highlights: the debate concerning the validity of pro-growth, local economic development policies; the rationales behind the adoption of such policies; the financing and implementation of pro-growth strategies; economic impacts; and the distributional consequences of pro-growth strategies focused on prestige developments.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Loftman & Brendan Nevin, 1996. "Going for Growth: Prestige Projects in Three British Cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(6), pages 991-1019, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:33:y:1996:i:6:p:991-1019
    DOI: 10.1080/00420989650011708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420989650011708
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420989650011708?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. I Turok, 1992. "Property-Led Urban Regeneration: Panacea or Placebo?," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 24(3), pages 361-379, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ding, Chengri & Niu, Yi & Lichtenberg, Erik, 2014. "Spending preferences of local officials with off-budget land revenues of Chinese cities," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 265-276.
    2. Ståle Holgersen & Guy Baeten, 2016. "Beyond a Liberal Critique of ‘Trickle Down': Urban Planning in the City of Malmö," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(6), pages 1170-1185, November.
    3. Brian Doucet, 2013. "Variations of the Entrepreneurial City: Goals, roles and visions in Rotterdam's Kop van Zuid and the Glasgow Harbour Megaprojects," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 2035-2051, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Valler & David Betteley, 2001. "The Politics of 'Integrated' Local Policy in England," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 38(13), pages 2393-2413, December.
    2. Rob Atkinson, 2000. "Combating Social Exclusion in Europe: The New Urban Policy Challenge," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(5-6), pages 1037-1055, May.
    3. Hermanus Geyer Jr, 2011. "The Retail City in Greater Birmingham – The changing face of urban retail districts as a result of retail-led regeneration and containment policy," ERSA conference papers ersa11p1358, European Regional Science Association.
    4. N A Phelps, 1997. "A Hazard of New Fortunes: The Built Environment and Economic Development in Croydon," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 24(5), pages 643-645, October.
    5. Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko, 2016. "City-as-a-Platform: The Rise of Participatory Innovation Platforms in Finnish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-31, September.
    6. Winifred Curran, 2004. "Gentrification and the Nature of Work: Exploring the Links in Williamsburg, Brooklyn," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 36(7), pages 1243-1258, July.
    7. Manuel Fernández-García & Clemente J. Navarro & Irene Gómez-Ramirez, 2021. "Evaluating Territorial Targets of European Integrated Urban Policy. The URBAN and URBANA Initiatives in Spain (1994–2013)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    8. R Imrie & H Thomas, 1993. "The Limits of Property-Led Regeneration," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 11(1), pages 87-102, March.
    9. Levy, Deborah & Hills, Raewyn & Perkins, Harvey C. & Mackay, Michael & Campbell, Malcolm & Johnston, Karen, 2021. "Local benevolent property development entrepreneurs in small town regeneration," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    10. John Henneberry & Claire Roberts, 2008. "Calculated Inequality? Portfolio Benchmarking and Regional Office Property Investment in the UK," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(5-6), pages 1217-1241, May.
    11. Rob Atkinson, 1999. "Discourses of Partnership and Empowerment in Contemporary British Urban Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(1), pages 59-72, January.
    12. Alastair Adair & Jim Berry & Stanley McGreal, 2003. "Financing Property's Contribution to Regeneration," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(5-6), pages 1065-1080, May.
    13. M Pryke & P Knox, 1994. "Commentaries," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 26(2), pages 167-176, February.
    14. John Edwards, 1995. "Social Policy and the City: A Review of Recent Policy Developments and Literature," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 32(4-5), pages 695-712, May.
    15. Laura Francis & Huw Thomas, 2006. "Evaluating Property-led Initiatives in Urban Regeneration: Tracing Vacancy Chains in Cardiff Bay," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 21(1), pages 49-64, February.
    16. S S Fainstein, 1994. "Government Programs for Commercial Redevelopment in Poor Neighborhoods: The Cases of Spitalfields in East London and Downtown Brooklyn, NY," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 26(2), pages 215-234, February.
    17. Amparo Tarazona Vento, 2017. "Mega-project meltdown: Post-politics, neoliberal urban regeneration and Valencia’s fiscal crisis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 54(1), pages 68-84, January.
    18. Edrissi, Ali & Poorzahedy, Hossain & Nassiri, Habibollah & Nourinejad, Mehdi, 2013. "A multi-agent optimization formulation of earthquake disaster prevention and management," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(1), pages 261-275.
    19. Peter Hall, 1997. "Regeneration Policies for Peripheral Housing Estates: Inward- and Outward-looking Approaches," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 34(5-6), pages 873-890, May.
    20. Tsang, Churn & Hsu, Lin-Fang, 2022. "Beneath the appearance of state-led gentrification: The case of the Kwun Tong Town Centre redevelopment in Hong Kong," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:33:y:1996:i:6:p:991-1019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.