IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v31y1994i7p1033-1042.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a Copenhagen Interpretation of Gentrification

Author

Listed:
  • Eric Clark

    (Institute of Geography, University of Copenhagen, øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen K, Denmark)

Abstract

In the social sciences, and particularly in gentrification research, there seems to be a persistent fascination with, and an urge to pursue a course towards synthesising, integrating or uniting very different approaches into a single comprehensive explanation. One concept often raised in this context is complementarity (associated with Bohr's 'Copenhagen interpretation' of quantum mechanics), though usually in an unreflective and uncritical manner. The purposes of this paper are to outline the concept of complementarity; to clarify what we should be careful not to ascribe to the concept; and to provide a rough sketch of what a Copenhagen interpretation of gentrification would involve. It is argued that while it is a worthy task to strive for integration and synthesis in comprehensive thick descriptions, we will have to accept that the theoretical bases for our understanding of various aspects included in these studies may not be so easy to unite into one unambiguous and internally consistent theoretical construct.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric Clark, 1994. "Towards a Copenhagen Interpretation of Gentrification," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 31(7), pages 1033-1042, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:31:y:1994:i:7:p:1033-1042
    DOI: 10.1080/00420989420080931
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420989420080931
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00420989420080931?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steven C. Bourassa, 1993. "The Rent Gap Debunked," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 30(10), pages 1731-1744, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ismael Yrigoy, 2019. "Rent gap reloaded: Airbnb and the shift from residential to touristic rental housing in the Palma Old Quarter in Mallorca, Spain," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(13), pages 2709-2726, October.
    2. Daniel J. Hammel, 1999. "Re-establishing the Rent Gap: An Alternative View of Capitalised Land Rent," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 36(8), pages 1283-1293, July.
    3. Yan, Haiming & Yang, Huicai & Guo, Xiaonan & Zhao, Shuqin & Jiang, Qun'ou, 2022. "Payments for ecosystem services as an essential approach to improving ecosystem services: A review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    4. Lai, Yani & Tang, Bosin & Chen, Xiangsheng & Zheng, Xian, 2021. "Spatial determinants of land redevelopment in the urban renewal processes in Shenzhen, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    5. Adam Millard-Ball, 2000. "Moving Beyond the Gentrification Gaps: Social Change, Tenure Change and Gap Theories in Stockholm," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 37(9), pages 1673-1693, August.
    6. Eric Clark, 1995. "The Rent Gap Re-examined," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 32(9), pages 1489-1503, November.
    7. Allen J. Scott, 2019. "City-regions reconsidered," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(3), pages 554-580, May.
    8. Hamil Pearsall, 2013. "Superfund Me: A Study of Resistance to Gentrification in New York City," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 50(11), pages 2293-2310, August.
    9. Callum Ward & Manuel B Aalbers, 2016. "Virtual special issue editorial essay: ‘The shitty rent business’: What’s the point of land rent theory?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(9), pages 1760-1783, July.
    10. Tom Kauko, 2004. "Towards Infusing Institutions and Agency into House Price Analysis," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(8), pages 1507-1519, July.
    11. Daniel You-Ren Yang & Jung-Che Chang, 2018. "Financialising space through transferable development rights: Urban renewal, Taipei style," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(9), pages 1943-1966, July.
    12. Ernesto López-Morales & Claudia Sanhueza & Sebastián Espinoza & Felipe Ordenes & Hernán Orozco, 2019. "Rent gap formation due to public infrastructure and planning policies: An analysis of Greater Santiago, Chile, 2008–2011," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 51(7), pages 1536-1557, October.
    13. Neil Smith, 1996. "Of Rent Gaps and Radical Idealism: A Reply to Steven Bourassa," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(7), pages 1199-1203, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:31:y:1994:i:7:p:1033-1042. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.