IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v2y1996i1p8-23.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards a social reproduction model

Author

Listed:
  • Gudrun Biffl

    (Austrian Institute of Economic Research, Vienna)

Abstract

Austria and Sweden are selected as countries of comparison for the impact of social choice models on the division of labour between the household and market sector and the skill structure of the labour force. These countries are chosen because they are of similar population size, they are both small open economies and have a corporate economic policy system with a strong social partnership. In spite of these similarities structural developments of labour supply and demand diverged markedly since the 60's, in particular as far as the incorporation of women into the labour market and the role of the public sector for the employment creation are concerned. In this paper it is argued that social choice models override economic policy orientations such that the outcomes of socio-economic processes end up at opposite ends of a continuum of production possibilities in the household and market sector. The Swedish social consensus is marked by equal opportunities and egalitarian principles while the Austrian popular vote hangs on to traditional patriarchal structures, which perpetuate the gendered division of the labour market and augment segmentation. Transfer of household production to the labour market today is hampered by the character of the remaining production in the household, in the main personal services. They have limited potential for productivity increases through economies of scale or technical advancement of production processes. Due to that prices for the services rendered on the market coincide more or less with wages, offering little room for wage rises in line with wages in the production of goods or production oriented services, which are financed out of productivity increases. As a result personal services tend to remain in the household sector (the case of Austria) unless the public sector takes over due to other than market oriented value and thus pricing systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Gudrun Biffl, 1996. "Towards a social reproduction model," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 2(1), pages 8-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:2:y:1996:i:1:p:8-23
    DOI: 10.1177/102425899600200104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/102425899600200104
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/102425899600200104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alois Guger, 1992. "Weltweit schwaches Einkommenswachstum und zunehmende Lohnunterschiede in den achtziger Jahren," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 65(2), pages 76-82, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:clr:wugarc:y:1993:v:19i:3p:265 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Thomas Delapina, 1992. "Österreichs Lohnquote im internationalen Vergleich," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 18(3), pages 287-310.
    3. Thomas Delapina, 1992. "Österreichs Lohnquote im internationalen Vergleich," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 18(3), pages 287-309.
    4. Michael Mesch, 1993. "Die Löhne und Gehälter nach Wirtschaftsklassen 1980-91," Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft - WuG, Kammer für Arbeiter und Angestellte für Wien, Abteilung Wirtschaftswissenschaft und Statistik, vol. 19(3), pages 265-289.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:2:y:1996:i:1:p:8-23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.