IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/treure/v23y2017i2p207-223.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards collective protections for crowdworkers

Author

Listed:
  • Annamaria Donini

    (Department of Legal Studies, University of Bologna, Italy)

  • Michele Forlivesi

    (Department of Legal Studies, University of Bologna, Italy)

  • Anna Rota

    (Department of Legal Studies, University of Bologna, Italy)

  • Patrizia Tullini

    (Department of Legal Studies, School of Law, University of Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

The ‘sharing economy’ and the collaborative economy are shaping new forms of employment in which digital platforms enable multilateral work relationships. This article discusses some initiatives aimed at the collective protection of crowdworkers. The first section investigates whether it is possible to extend EU labour protection – in particular, collective rights – to independent digital contractors. The second section looks at whether the national level may offer more effective measures for economically dependent digital workers or for distance workers, by comparing three selected countries: Italy, France and Spain. The article then explores the possibility of extending to crowdworkers the protections offered by collective bargaining and addresses how trade unions could have a role in implementing guarantees for crowdworkers. Comparative analysis is used to show how different constitutional systems recognise freedom of association, especially in relation to ‘subordinated’ workers. A strategy of viewing collective rights as human rights could be applied in order to reduce the contractual weakness of self-employed workers on digital platforms – and might even form the basis of a bill of rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Annamaria Donini & Michele Forlivesi & Anna Rota & Patrizia Tullini, 2017. "Towards collective protections for crowdworkers," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 23(2), pages 207-223, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:23:y:2017:i:2:p:207-223
    DOI: 10.1177/1024258916688863
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1024258916688863
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1024258916688863?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:23:y:2017:i:2:p:207-223. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.