IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/soueco/v4y2003i1p19-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agreement on Agriculture: Issues of Market Access for South Asian Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Posh Raj Pandey

    (Nepal's Accession to WTO, GPO Box 107, Kathmandu, Nepal)

Abstract

The Uruguay Round achieved a historic turning point in the reform of agricultural trade system through adoption of the Agreement on Agriculture (AoA). The AoA lays firm foundation for strengthening multilateral discipline on agriculture trade by bringing the agriculture sector under GATT disciplines. It prohibits the use of non-tariff barriers and obliges members to reduce tariff barriers in the agriculture sector, and also establishes rules to restrain the use of domestic policy measures in the form of domestic support and export subsidies that have trade-distorting effects. Against these backgrounds, the paper delves into critical assessment of opportunities emanating from the AoA for the export of agriculture products by South Asian countries. The paper shows that member countries, in particular developed ones altogether, have not respected the agreement fully and faithfully, and tend to exploit the grey areas of the text to deny market access. As a result, new threats have been emerged. Since the agricultural export structure of South Asian countries are highly concentrated in a few products and markets, market access conditions even for few products would play a decisive role in terms of their export development potentials. The paper suggests that the ongoing negotiation on agriculture is an opportune venue for South Asia to correct the unbalanced provisions and modalities of implementation, and tilt the international agriculture market in their favour. For this, South Asian countries need to devise a common minimum position and put forward such position collectively along with forging issue-based alliances with other countries/groups. Given the limited usage of domestic supports and export subsidies coupled with fiscal constraints to introduce new ones, the level ofdispar ities in bound and applied tariffs of South Asian countries, the depth of market access barriers in other WTO members and the extent of price fluctuation ofagri cultural products in international market, the paper argue that South Asian coun tries should focus aggressively on expanding market access opportunities for their exportable products in the negotiations rather than protecting domestic market except for rural development and food security concern.

Suggested Citation

  • Posh Raj Pandey, 2003. "Agreement on Agriculture: Issues of Market Access for South Asian Countries," South Asia Economic Journal, Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka, vol. 4(1), pages 19-40, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:soueco:v:4:y:2003:i:1:p:19-40
    DOI: 10.1177/139156140300400103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/139156140300400103
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/139156140300400103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lindland, Jostein, 1997. "The impact of the Uruguay Round on tariff escalation in agricultural products," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 487-500, December.
    2. Gibson, Paul R. & Wainio, John & Whitley, Daniel B. & Bohman, Mary, 2001. "Profiles Of Tariffs In Global Agricultural Markets," Agricultural Economic Reports 34055, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Bhagwati, Jagdish, 1993. "India in Transition: Freeing the Economy," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198288473.
    4. Dixit, Praveen M. & Josling, Timothy E. & Blandford, David, 2001. "The Current Wto Agricultural Negotiations: Options For Progress; Synthesis," Commissioned Papers 14623, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    5. World Bank, 2002. "World Development Indicators 2002," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 13921.
    6. Burfisher, Mary E., 2001. "The Road Ahead: Agricultural Policy Reform In The Wto -- Summary Report," Agricultural Economic Reports 34067, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Arvind PANAGARIYA, 2000. "The Millennium Round And Developing Countries: Negotiating Strategies And Areas Of Benefits," G-24 Discussion Papers 1, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tu, Anh Thuy & Beghin, John & Gozlan, Estelle, 2008. "Tariff escalation and invasive species damages," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 619-629, November.
    2. Anh Tu & John C. Beghin & Estelle Gozlan, 2005. "Tariff Escalation and Invasive Species Risk," Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (FAPRI) Publications (archive only) 05-wp407, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    3. Francois, Joseph & Wooton, Ian, 2004. "Market Structure in Services and Market Access in Goods," Conference papers 331244, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    4. Chaddad, Fabio R. & Aguilar, Patricia & Jank, Marcos S., 2005. "Agrifood Market Integration: Perspectives from Developing Countries," 2005 NAAMIC Workshop II: Agrifood Regulatory and Policy Integration under Stress 163860, North American Agrifood Market Integration Consortium (NAAMIC).
    5. Regmi, Anita & Gehlhar, Mark J. & Wainio, John & Vollrath, Thomas L. & Johnston, Paul V. & Kathuria, Nitin, 2005. "Market Access For High-Value Foods," Agricultural Economic Reports 33999, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Maria Cipollina & Luca Salvatici, 2008. "Measuring Protection: Mission Impossible?," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(3), pages 577-616, July.
    7. Poonyth, Daneswar & Sharma, Ramesh & Konandreas, Panos A., 2004. "The impact of the WTO agricultural negotiating modalities on Southern African Development Community countries," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 43(3), pages 1-21, September.
    8. repec:ilo:ilowps:366690 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Hanson, Kenneth & Somwaru, Agapi, 2003. "Distributional Effects of U.S. Farm Commodity Programs: Accounting for Farm and Non-Farm Households," Conference papers 331120, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    10. Dixit, Praveen M. & Josling, Timothy E. & Blandford, David, 2001. "The Current Wto Agricultural Negotiations: Options For Progress; Synthesis," Commissioned Papers 14623, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    11. Ludger Wößmann, 2005. "Educational Production in East Asia: The Impact of Family Background and Schooling Policies on Student Performance," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 6(3), pages 331-353, August.
    12. Nancy Birdsall, 2002. "A Stormy Day on an Open Field: Asymmetry and Convergence in the Global Economy," RBA Annual Conference Volume (Discontinued), in: David Gruen & Terry O'Brien & Jeremy Lawson (ed.),Globalisation, Living Standards and Inequality: Recent Progress and Continuing Challenges, Reserve Bank of Australia.
    13. Mohamed Hedi Bchir & Sébastien Jean & David Laborde, 2006. "Binding Overhang and Tariff-Cutting Formulas," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 142(2), pages 207-232, July.
    14. Marijke Verpoorten & Lode Berlage, 2004. "Genocide and land scarcity: Can Rwandan rural households manage?," CSAE Working Paper Series 2004-15, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
    15. Patibandla, Murali, 2006. "Equity pattern, corporate governance and performance: A study of India's corporate sector," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 29-44, January.
    16. Jamison, Eliot A. & Jamison, Dean T. & Hanushek, Eric A., 2007. "The effects of education quality on income growth and mortality decline," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(6), pages 771-788, December.
    17. Axel Dreher, 2002. "Does Globalization Affect Growth?," Development and Comp Systems 0210004, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 16 Jun 2003.
    18. Busse, Matthias, 2004. "On the determinants of core labour standards: the case of developing countries," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 83(2), pages 211-217, May.
    19. Malte LÜBKER, 2004. "Globalization and perceptions of social inequality," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 143(1-2), pages 91-128, March.
    20. Dodzin, Sergei & Vamvakidis, Athanasios, 2004. "Trade and industrialization in developing economies," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 319-328, October.
    21. Robert Kirk & Matthew Stern, 2005. "The New Southern African Customs Union Agreement," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 169-190, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    (JEL: F13; F14) Keywords: Agreement on Agriculture; Aggregate Measure of Support (AMS); South Asian Countries; Trade Distortions.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:soueco:v:4:y:2003:i:1:p:19-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ips.lk/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.