IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v4y1975i1p54-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some Observations On Design Issues in Large-Scale Social Experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Katharine C. Lyall

    (Johns Hopkins University)

Abstract

A number of important methodological issues have emerged from recent large-scale social experiments which have an important bearing on the ultimate usefulness of such research for policy determination This paper discusses a number of these design issues in the context of the New Jersey Income Maintenance Experiment, focusing on the importance of the shift from .conventional to optimal designs for experiments with inherently costly treatments. Risks of optimal designs lie in the possible misspecification of the response surface and the exclusion of important secondary objectives which may be politically important to policy use. The conclusion is that experimentation is a costly research method which compels optimal designs in order to identify generally small treatment effects at the usual significance levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Katharine C. Lyall, 1975. "Some Observations On Design Issues in Large-Scale Social Experiments," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 4(1), pages 54-76, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:4:y:1975:i:1:p:54-76
    DOI: 10.1177/004912417500400104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/004912417500400104
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/004912417500400104?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Conlisk, John, 1973. "Choice of Response Functional Form in Designing Subsidy Experiments," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 41(4), pages 643-656, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James J. Heckman, 1991. "Randomization and Social Policy Evaluation Revisited," NBER Technical Working Papers 0107, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. James J. Heckman, 1991. "Randomization and Social Policy Evaluation Revisited," NBER Technical Working Papers 0107, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Larry L. Orr & Daniel Gubits, 2023. "Some Lessons From 50 Years of Multiarm Public Policy Experiments," Evaluation Review, , vol. 47(1), pages 43-70, February.
    4. Madden, Gary & Bloch, Harry & Hensher, David, 1993. "Australian telephone network subscription and calling demands: evidence from a stated-preference experiment," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 5(3), pages 207-230, October.
    5. Connelly, Luke B., 2003. "Balancing the Number and Size of Sites: An Economic Approach to the Optimal Design of Cluster Samples," MPRA Paper 14676, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Krupka, Erin L. & Stephens, Melvin, 2013. "The stability of measured time preferences," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 11-19.
    7. Jerry A. Hausman & David A. Wise, 1985. "Technical Problems in Social Experimentation: Cost versus Ease of Analysis," NBER Chapters, in: Social Experimentation, pages 187-220, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    8. Deaton, Angus & Cartwright, Nancy, 2018. "Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 2-21.
    9. Philipson, Tomas, 1997. "The evaluation of new health care technology: The labor economics of statistics," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 76(1-2), pages 375-395.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:4:y:1975:i:1:p:54-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.