IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/somere/v45y2016i1p109-133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developing Multidimensional Likert Scales Using Item Factor Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Rodrigo A. Asún
  • Karina Rdz-Navarro
  • Jesús M. Alvarado

Abstract

This study compares the performance of two approaches in analysing four-point Likert rating scales with a factorial model: the classical factor analysis (FA) and the item factor analysis (IFA). For FA, maximum likelihood and weighted least squares estimations using Pearson correlation matrices among items are compared. For IFA, diagonally weighted least squares and unweighted least squares estimations using items polychoric correlation matrices are compared. Two hundred and ten conditions were simulated in a Monte Carlo study considering: one to three factor structures (either, independent and correlated in two levels), medium or low quality of items, three different levels of item asymmetry and five sample sizes. Results showed that IFA procedures achieve equivalent and accurate parameter estimates; in contrast, FA procedures yielded biased parameter estimates. Therefore, we do not recommend classical FA under the conditions considered. Minimum requirements for achieving accurate results using IFA procedures are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodrigo A. Asún & Karina Rdz-Navarro & Jesús M. Alvarado, 2016. "Developing Multidimensional Likert Scales Using Item Factor Analysis," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 45(1), pages 109-133, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:45:y:2016:i:1:p:109-133
    DOI: 10.1177/0049124114566716
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124114566716
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0049124114566716?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anders Christoffersson, 1977. "Two-step weighted least squares factor analysis of dichotomized variables," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 42(3), pages 433-438, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexander Robitzsch, 2024. "A Comparison of Limited Information Estimation Methods for the Two-Parameter Normal-Ogive Model with Locally Dependent Items," Stats, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-16, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:45:y:2016:i:1:p:109-133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.