IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v16y2011i3p202-211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developments in British Sociology as Shown in British Sociology Journals

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Crothers

Abstract

To provide a factual foundation for understanding of the trajectory of the development in British sociology a content analysis of the journal articles in the main generalist British sociology journals is provided. This contributes both an overall picture, and allows an account of contrasts between the journals. Attention is focused on the extent to which the content differs between British and other authors (and more detailed geographical breakdowns and other aspects of authorship) and how content has changed over time. Finally, how the research outcomes are related to some of the characteristics of producers and producing departments are assayed.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Crothers, 2011. "Developments in British Sociology as Shown in British Sociology Journals," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(3), pages 202-211, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:16:y:2011:i:3:p:202-211
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.2445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.2445
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.2445?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Daoud, Adel & Kohl, Sebastian, 2016. "How much do sociologists write about economic topics? Using big data to test some conventional views in economic sociology, 1890 to 2014," MPIfG Discussion Paper 16/7, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    2. Canan Neşe Kınıkoğlu, 2019. "Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Sociology in Post-1990 Turkey," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 24(4), pages 598-616, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:16:y:2011:i:3:p:202-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.