IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v10y2005i3p150-151.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capturing the Livingness and Liveliness of Critique-In-Action

Author

Listed:
  • David Beer

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • David Beer, 2005. "Capturing the Livingness and Liveliness of Critique-In-Action," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(3), pages 150-151, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:10:y:2005:i:3:p:150-151
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.1117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.1117
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.1117?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Scott, 2005. "Sociology and Its Others: Reflections on Disciplinary Specialisation and Fragmentation," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(1), pages 71-78, June.
    2. David Beer & Nicholas Gane, 2004. "Back to the Future of Social Theory: An Interview with Nicholas Gane," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 9(4), pages 81-88, November.
    3. Gayle Letherby, 2005. "Current Issues and Future Trends in Sociology: Extending the Debate in Sociological Research Online," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(1), pages 69-70, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Benet Davetian, 2005. "Towards an Emotionally Conscious Social Theory," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(2), pages 81-95, July.
    2. John Scott, 2005. "Fallacies in the Critique of Disciplinary Sociology," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(3), pages 139-144, November.
    3. Tim Strangleman, 2005. "Sociological Futures and the Sociology of Work," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(4), pages 51-62, December.
    4. John Urry, 2005. "Beyond the Science of ‘Society’," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(2), pages 78-80, July.
    5. Malcolm Williams & Luke Sloan & Charlotte Brookfield, 2017. "A Tale of Two Sociologies: Analyzing Versus Critique in UK Sociology," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(4), pages 132-151, December.
    6. Benet Davetian, 2005. "What is Human Society? It is a Feeling Society: A Response to Gane and Scott," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(4), pages 45-50, December.
    7. Sylvia Walby, 2011. "The Impact of Feminism on Sociology," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(3), pages 158-168, August.
    8. Morgan Meyer & Susan Molyneux-Hodgson, 2010. "Introduction: The Dynamics of Epistemic Communities," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 15(2), pages 109-115, May.
    9. Liz Stanley, 2005. "A Child of Its Time: Hybridic Perspectives on Othering in Sociology," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(3), pages 123-138, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:10:y:2005:i:3:p:150-151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.