IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socres/v10y2005i3p123-138.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Child of Its Time: Hybridic Perspectives on Othering in Sociology

Author

Listed:
  • Liz Stanley

Abstract

Responding to John Scott's (2005) ‘Sociology and its others’, the idea of hybridic sociologies is developed, Mills’ ideas about ‘the sociological imagination’ are discussed, Scott's proposal for a core curriculum countered with some suggestions for extended in-depth disciplinary debate about an intellectually expansionist programme for UK sociology, and responses to these suggestions as well as to the broad argument are welcomed.

Suggested Citation

  • Liz Stanley, 2005. "A Child of Its Time: Hybridic Perspectives on Othering in Sociology," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(3), pages 123-138, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:10:y:2005:i:3:p:123-138
    DOI: 10.5153/sro.1125
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.1125
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5153/sro.1125?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stevi Jackson, 1999. "Feminist Sociology and Sociological Feminism: Recovering the Social in Feminist Thought," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 4(3), pages 43-56, September.
    2. John Scott, 2005. "Sociology and Its Others: Reflections on Disciplinary Specialisation and Fragmentation," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(1), pages 71-78, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kirsty Sherlock, 2002. "Community Matters: Reflections from the Field," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 7(2), pages 40-55, May.
    2. Benet Davetian, 2005. "Towards an Emotionally Conscious Social Theory," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(2), pages 81-95, July.
    3. Malcolm Williams & Luke Sloan & Charlotte Brookfield, 2017. "A Tale of Two Sociologies: Analyzing Versus Critique in UK Sociology," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 22(4), pages 132-151, December.
    4. Mohammed Abdel Karim Al Hourani, 2024. "Gendered Interaction and Practices of Intimacy Among Emirati Young Spouses: Exploring the Experiences of Wives," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 29(1), pages 41-61, March.
    5. Liz Stanley & Sue Wise, 2006. "Putting it into Practice[1]: Using Feminist Fractured Foundationalism in Researching Children in the Concentration Camps of the South African War[2]," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 11(1), pages 14-50, April.
    6. Morgan Meyer & Susan Molyneux-Hodgson, 2010. "Introduction: The Dynamics of Epistemic Communities," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 15(2), pages 109-115, May.
    7. John Urry, 2005. "Beyond the Science of ‘Society’," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(2), pages 78-80, July.
    8. John Scott, 2005. "Fallacies in the Critique of Disciplinary Sociology," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(3), pages 139-144, November.
    9. Sylvia Walby, 2011. "The Impact of Feminism on Sociology," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 16(3), pages 158-168, August.
    10. Tim Strangleman, 2005. "Sociological Futures and the Sociology of Work," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(4), pages 51-62, December.
    11. David Beer, 2005. "Capturing the Livingness and Liveliness of Critique-In-Action," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 10(3), pages 150-151, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:10:y:2005:i:3:p:123-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.