IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v67y2021i1p46-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fear, xenophobia and collectivism as predictors of well-being during Coronavirus disease 2019: An empirical study from India

Author

Listed:
  • Kanika K Ahuja
  • Debanjan Banerjee
  • Kritika Chaudhary
  • Chehak Gidwani

Abstract

Background: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has emerged as a global health threat. Biological disasters like this can generate immense prejudice, xenophobia, stigma and othering, all of which have adverse consequences on health and well-being. In a country as diverse and populous in India, such crisis can trigger communalism and mutual blame. Keeping this in context, this study explored the relationship between well-being and xenophobic attitudes towards Muslims, collectivism and fear of COVID-19 in India. Methods: The study was carried out on 600 non-Islamic Indians (231 males, 366 females and 3 others; mean age: 38.76 years), using convenience sampling. An online survey containing Fear of Coronavirus scale, Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale and Collectivism Scale was used. Xenophobia was assessed using two scales: generalized prejudice towards Muslims and specific xenophobic tendencies towards Muslims during COVID-19. The data were analysed using correlational methods and multiple regression. Results: The findings showed that positively significant relationship exists between well-being and age as well as with collectivism, while an inversely significant relationship between well-being and fear of COVID-19 was found. The results of the multiple regression analysis shows that fear of COVID-19, age, collectivism and generalized xenophobia, in the order of their importance, together contributed to nearly 20% of variance in well-being. Conclusion: The findings are reflective of the importance of collectivism in enhancing well-being in these times of uncertainty. Xenophobia, one of the common offshoots of pandemics, can also harm the overall well-being. Implications are discussed in the light of India’s diverse socio-religious background and global context.

Suggested Citation

  • Kanika K Ahuja & Debanjan Banerjee & Kritika Chaudhary & Chehak Gidwani, 2021. "Fear, xenophobia and collectivism as predictors of well-being during Coronavirus disease 2019: An empirical study from India," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 67(1), pages 46-53, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:67:y:2021:i:1:p:46-53
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764020936323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764020936323
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764020936323?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M. Joseph Sirgy & Min Young Kim & Mohsen Joshanloo & Michael Bosnjak, 2019. "Is Subjective Ill-Being Related to Islamophobia in Germany? In Search for Moderators," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(8), pages 2655-2675, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Satoshi Araki & Francisco Olivos, 2024. "Low Income, Ill-being, and Gender Inequality: Explaining Cross-National Variation in the Gendered Risk of Suffering Among the Poor," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 174(1), pages 157-220, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:67:y:2021:i:1:p:46-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.