IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v61y2015i3p241-250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving social functioning and reducing social isolation and loneliness among people with enduring mental illness: Report of a randomised controlled trial of supported socialisation

Author

Listed:
  • Ann J Sheridan
  • Jonathan Drennan
  • Barbara Coughlan
  • Donal O’Keeffe
  • Kate Frazer
  • Mary Kemple
  • Denise Alexander
  • Frances Howlin
  • Anne Fahy
  • Veronica Kow
  • Eadbhard O’Callaghan

Abstract

Background: This randomised controlled trial examined if for people with enduring mental illness, being supported to socialise leads to improved social functioning, increased self-esteem and extended social networks; a reduction in social isolation, social, emotional and family loneliness and a reduction in illness symptoms, namely depression. Methods: A prospective randomised controlled trial was undertaken from November 2007 to September 2011. Service users with a diagnosis of enduring mental illness (>18 years) were invited to participate. Participants were randomly allocated to intervention or control group conditions in a 1:1 ratio. Intervention group participants were matched with a volunteer partner, asked to engage in social/leisure activities for 2 hours weekly over a 9-month period, and received a €20 stipend monthly. Control group participants received a €20 monthly stipend and were asked to engage in a weekly social/leisure activity. Social functioning, the primary outcome, was measured using the Social Functioning Scale (SFS) at three time points (baseline, midpoint and endpoint). Findings: In all, 107 people completed this study. There were no significant differences between control and intervention groups at the commencement of the intervention on demographic characteristics or the main outcome measures of interest. Overall social functioning positively changed throughout the three time points from a mean of 99·7 (standard deviation ( SD ) = 15.1) at baseline, to a mean of 106.0 ( SD = 27.0) at the endpoint for the control group, and from a mean of 100·4 ( SD = 15.0) at Time 1 for the intervention group, to a mean of 104.1 ( SD = 23.4) at the endpoint for the intervention group. Conclusions: The intervention showed no statistical differences between the control and intervention groups on primary or secondary outcome measures. The stipend and the stipend plus volunteer partner led to an increase in recreational social functioning; a decrease in levels of social loneliness, in depression and in the proportion living within a vulnerable social network.

Suggested Citation

  • Ann J Sheridan & Jonathan Drennan & Barbara Coughlan & Donal O’Keeffe & Kate Frazer & Mary Kemple & Denise Alexander & Frances Howlin & Anne Fahy & Veronica Kow & Eadbhard O’Callaghan, 2015. "Improving social functioning and reducing social isolation and loneliness among people with enduring mental illness: Report of a randomised controlled trial of supported socialisation," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 61(3), pages 241-250, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:61:y:2015:i:3:p:241-250
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764014540150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764014540150
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764014540150?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ulla-Karin Schön & Anne Denhov & Alain Topor, 2009. "Social Relationships as a Decisive Factor in Recovering From Severe Mental Illness," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 55(4), pages 336-347, July.
    2. Brian H. Mccorkle & Erin C. Dunn & Yu Mui Wan & Cheryl Gagne, 2009. "Compeer Friends: a Qualitative Study of a Volunteer Friendship Programme for People with Serious Mental Illness," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 55(4), pages 291-305, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariana Pinto da Costa & Agnes Chevalier & Aida Farreny & Megan Cassidy & Monica Leverton & Sarah Toner & Stefan Priebe, 2019. "How would patients with psychosis like to be in contact with a volunteer: Face-to-face or digitally?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-13, May.
    2. Lotte Groth Jensen & Stina Lou & Jørgen Aagaard & Ulla Væggemose, 2017. "Community families: A qualitative study of families who volunteer to support persons with severe mental illness," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 63(1), pages 33-39, February.
    3. Yvonne Stolk & Katherine Sevar & Nga Tran & Serafino G Mancuso & Prem Chopra & David Castle, 2015. "A comparative study of the economic and social functioning of Vietnamese-Australians with low English proficiency living with psychotic illness," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 61(4), pages 319-329, June.
    4. Deborah Windell & Ross MG Norman, 2013. "A qualitative analysis of influences on recovery following a first episode of psychosis," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 59(5), pages 493-500, August.
    5. Sara Fernández-Aguayo & Margarita Pino-Juste, 2023. "Sustainable Health and Wellness: Effectiveness of a Drama Therapy Program to Improve the Wellbeing of People Affected by Mental Health Decline," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Ann Sheridan & Donal O’Keeffe & Barbara Coughlan & Kate Frazer & Johnathan Drennan & Mary Kemple, 2018. "Friendship and money: A qualitative study of service users’ experiences of participating in a supported socialisation programme," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 64(4), pages 326-334, June.
    7. Yulia Kartalova-O’Doherty & Donna Tedstone Doherty, 2011. "Recovering from mental health problems: Perceived positive and negative effects of medication on reconnecting with life," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 57(6), pages 610-618, November.
    8. J. A. W. M. van Gestel-Timmermans & E. P. M. Brouwers & I. L. Bongers & M. A. L. M. van Assen & Ch. van Nieuwenhuizen, 2012. "Profiles of individually defined recovery of people with major psychiatric problems," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 58(5), pages 521-531, September.
    9. Anne Denhov & Alain Topor, 2012. "The components of helping relationships with professionals in psychiatry: Users’ perspective," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 58(4), pages 417-424, July.
    10. Bernadette AM Cullen & Ramin Mojtabai & Elahe Bordbar & Anita Everett & Katie L Nugent & William W Eaton, 2017. "Social network, recovery attitudes and internal stigma among those with serious mental illness," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 63(5), pages 448-458, August.
    11. Greet Wilrycx & Marcel Croon & Anneloes Van den Broek & Chijs van Nieuwenhuizen, 2015. "Evaluation of a recovery-oriented care training program for mental healthcare professionals: Effects on mental health consumer outcomes," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 61(2), pages 164-173, March.
    12. Ulla Væggemose & Stina Lou & Michal Frumer & Nanna Limskov Stærk Christiansen & Jørgen Aagaard & Lisbeth Ørtenblad, 2017. "Community Families: Bridging the gap between mental health services and civil society – A qualitative study from users’ perspective," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 63(2), pages 132-138, March.
    13. Chijs van Nieuwenhuizen & Greet Wilrycx & Mozhgan Moradi & Evelien Brouwers, 2014. "Psychometric evaluation of the Dutch version of the Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM)," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 60(2), pages 162-168, March.
    14. Linda Denise Oakley & Jonathan W. Kanter & Janette Y. Taylor & Marilyn Duguid, 2012. "The self-stigma of depression for women," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 58(5), pages 512-520, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:61:y:2015:i:3:p:241-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.